Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/923,944

Method for Controlling Position of Sample in Charged Particle Beam Device, Program, Storage Medium, Control Device, and Charged Particle Beam Device

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 08, 2022
Examiner
VANORE, DAVID A
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1099 granted / 1239 resolved
+20.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1272
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§103
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1239 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed January 14th, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding the amendment to claim 19 and the rejection under 35 USC § 101, the remarks and amendment do correct the claim under these grounds and the 35 USC § 101 rejection of claim 19 is overcome. Regarding the rejection of claims 12-13, 18, and 20-22 under 35 USC § 103, the Applicants remarks are not persuasive. Applicant argues that claim 12 is directed to the movement of a sample holder. Indeed, this is case and such teaching for sample holder movement was the impetus for relying on ‘646 to demonstrate such sample movement supplementing the piezoelectric stage in ‘171. ‘646 is relied upon to merely show what the conventional stage may accomplish in terms of movement. One of ordinary skill with the art relied upon in hand could concoct any set of discrete movement steps because the nature of a piezoelectric stage is to allow one of ordinary skill to scan a sample as desired. PNG media_image1.png 380 484 media_image1.png Greyscale Note in the Fig. above from ‘646. Let the right side of the sample show be the target position. The indicated scan pattern begins towards the target, then away, then back towards. So, the allegation that the prior art does not show that which is claimed is not persuasive. As a result, claims 12, 13, 18, and 20-22 stand rejected under 35 USC § 103 for the reasons previously made of record. Additionally, applicants amendment to claim 19 necessitates the inclusion of claim 19 in the above rejection such that claim 19 is now also rejected for the same rationale applied to claim 12. The reasons for indicating allowable subject matter of claims 14-17 similar stand. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID A VANORE whose telephone number is (571)272-2483. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7AM to 6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DAVID A. VANORE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2881 /DAVID A VANORE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 18, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592357
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-BEAM ELECTRON MICROSCOPY USING A DETECTOR ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592465
A BROADBAND MICROWAVE WINDOW ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586751
Transfer Device and Analysis System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586755
APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING AND/OR PROCESSING A SAMPLE WITH A PARTICLE BEAM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571780
DATA PROCESSING DEVICE FOR CHROMATOGRAPH, DATA PROCESSING METHOD, AND CHROMATOGRAPH
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.5%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1239 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month