Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 17/923,966

POROUS MEMBRANE OF POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE AND/OR MODIFIED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE HAVING HIGH STRENGTH AND SMALL PORE DIAMETER

Final Rejection §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Nov 08, 2022
Priority
May 08, 2020 — JP 2020-082449 +2 more
Examiner
KHATRI, PRASHANT J
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Chemours-Mitsui Fluoroproducts Co. Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 871 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 871 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION In response to Amendments/Arguments filed 6/26/2026. Claims 1 and 3-11 are pending. Claims 9-11 are withdrawn. Claims 1 and 3-8 are examined thusly. Response to Amendment The Declaration under 37 CFR 1.132 filed 6/26/2026 is sufficient to overcome the rejection of claims 1 and 3-8 based upon Bacino and Bacino in view of Xu et al. Double Patenting Claims 1 and 3-8 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-7 of U.S. Patent No. 12138842 in view of Xu et al. (US 8557883). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both sets of claims are directed to at least a PTFE porous film having overlapping bubble points and further properties that are the same. While it is noted that the ‘842 claims recite a tensile strength but is silent to whether this is in the machine or cross direction and the ratio thereof, since the further properties are the same and the materials are the same, the CD and MD when measured would overlap and in scope as well, resulting in a ratio that also would overlap in scope. The ‘842 claims are silent to the use of a PTFE copolymer. Xu discloses an expandable TFE copolymer product. The TFE copolymer comprises tetrafluoroethylene and a comonomer at a content of less than 1 mol%, wherein the comonomer can be a perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether) as claimed (cols. 5-7; Tables 3-5; e.g. Example 9). The addition of a comonomer at the amount as claimed allows for imparting different chemical or physical properties to the expanded article (cols. 9-12). As such, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use a TFE copolymer in order to provide an article with different chemical and physical properties. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pp. 69, filed 6/26/2026, with respect to the 35 USC 102(a)(1) and 103 rejections under Bacino and in view of Xu have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejections of the claims have been withdrawn. Examiner acknowledges the 1.132 declaration filed 6/26/2026 overcomes the previous rejection. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PRASHANT J KHATRI whose telephone number is (571)270-3470. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at (571) 272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PRASHANT J. KHATRI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1783 /PRASHANT J KHATRI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jun 13, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Dec 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT
Jun 26, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695016
MULTILAYER MAGNETIC SHEET
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690307
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687017
FLOOR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673452
LAMINATED FILM AND MOLDED ARTICLE, AND PRODUCTION METHODS THEREFOR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668525
COVER MATERIAL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+28.5%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 871 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month