Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/929,608

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Sep 02, 2022
Examiner
LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE
Art Unit
2195
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Panasonic Well LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
360 granted / 429 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
438
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 429 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim language in the following claims is not clearly understood: As per claim 1, line 19, it is unclear whether “the training dataset” is same or different from “the updated training dataset” (i.e. is it further modifying the updated training dataset? Or modifying the original training dataset prior the update? Consistent term should be used) As per claim 7, line 2-3, it is unclear whether “a new proposal” generated using the finetuned machine-learning process is same or different from “a new proposal for a new task” in claim 1 (i.e. consistent term should be used with “the” or “said” if they are the same) As per claims 8 and 15, they have the same deficiency as claim 1 above. Appropriate correction is required. As per claims 14, and 20 they have the same deficiency as claim 7 above. Appropriate correction is required. As per claims 2-7, 9-14, 16-20, they depend from rejected claims and do not resolve the deficiencies thereof and are therefore rejected for at least the same reasons. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAMMY EUNHYE LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-7773. The examiner can normally be reached Mon, Tues, Thur 9PM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aimee Li can be reached at (571)272-4169. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAMMY E LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2195
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 02, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596595
Subscription to Sync Zones
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12566643
GENERATING TEMPORAL PREDICTIONS FOR PROVISIONING CLOUD RESOURCES USING TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12566634
System and Method for Non-Blocking State Synchronization Between Services
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12541386
Distributed Data Center
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12536040
DATA SEQUENCE PREDICTION AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.5%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 429 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month