Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
13 pending office actions • 5 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 13 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 13 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 4 (31%) |
| §103 only | 8 (62%) |
| §112 only | 1 (8%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 4 | 18.6% | +28.6% |
| STEWART, CRYSTOL | 2 | 33.7% | +29.3% |
| ALSTON, FRANK MAURICE | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
| FEACHER, LORENA R | 1 | 28.7% | +32.5% |
| PADOT, TIMOTHY | 1 | 39.3% | +28.2% |
| ANDERSON, FOLASHADE | 1 | 35.2% | +38.9% |
| GAVIN, KRISTIN ELIZABETH | 1 | 15.1% | +16.6% |
| LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE | 1 | 83.9% | +30.7% |
| TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA | 1 | 47.4% | +26.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17929608 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES | LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE | 14d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18807644 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 120d overdue |
| 17819467 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 37d overdue |
| 18807708 | AUTOMATED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF GOAL-ORIENTED TASKS | ANDERSON, FOLASHADE | 28d overdue |
| 17929111 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING DYNAMIC TASK SUMMARIES | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 11d overdue |
| 17817500 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING LIKELIHOOD OF TASK DELEGATION | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 5d overdue |
| 17930296 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING DYNAMIC INTERFACING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES | GAVIN, KRISTIN ELIZABETH | 4d overdue |
| 17817518 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERFACES FOR ENABLING TASK DELEGATION CONTROLS | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 4d overdue |
| 19044365 | REPRESENTATIVE TASK GENERATION AND CURATION | FEACHER, LORENA R | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18807644 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 120d overdue |
| 17817545 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND CURATING TASKS | TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA | 44d overdue |
| 17819467 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 37d overdue |
| 18807708 | AUTOMATED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF GOAL-ORIENTED TASKS | ANDERSON, FOLASHADE | 28d overdue |
| 18989067 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATION OF CALENDAR APPLICATIONS WITH TASK FACILITATION SERVICES | PADOT, TIMOTHY | 26d overdue |
| 17929111 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING DYNAMIC TASK SUMMARIES | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 11d overdue |
| 17817500 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING LIKELIHOOD OF TASK DELEGATION | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 5d overdue |
| 17930296 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING DYNAMIC INTERFACING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES | GAVIN, KRISTIN ELIZABETH | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 7 |
| 3625 | 3 |
| 3623 | 1 |
| 2195 | 1 |
| 2654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19044400 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL COMMUNICATION IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | ALSTON, FRANK MAURICE | 3625 | §103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Feb 03, 2025 |
| 19044365 | REPRESENTATIVE TASK GENERATION AND CURATION | FEACHER, LORENA R | 3625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Feb 03, 2025 |
| 18989067 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATION OF CALENDAR APPLICATIONS WITH TASK FACILITATION SERVICES | PADOT, TIMOTHY | 3625 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 26d overdue | Pending | Dec 20, 2024 |
| 18807644 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 3624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 120d overdue | Pending | Aug 16, 2024 |
| 18807708 | AUTOMATED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATION OF GOAL-ORIENTED TASKS | ANDERSON, FOLASHADE | 3623 | §101 | Final Rejection | 28d overdue | Pending | Aug 16, 2024 |
| 17930296 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING DYNAMIC INTERFACING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES | GAVIN, KRISTIN ELIZABETH | 3624 | §101 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Sep 07, 2022 |
| 17929608 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING IN TASK-FACILITATION SERVICES | LEE, TAMMY EUNHYE | 2195 | §112 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Sep 02, 2022 |
| 17929438 | GENERATING TASKS FROM CHAT STREAM DATA | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | Sep 02, 2022 |
| 17929111 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND PRESENTING DYNAMIC TASK SUMMARIES | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 3624 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Sep 01, 2022 |
| 17819467 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE IN A TASK DETERMINATION SYSTEM | PUJOLS-CRUZ, MARJORIE | 3624 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 37d overdue | Pending | Aug 12, 2022 |
| 17817545 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND CURATING TASKS | TENGBUMROONG, NATHAN NARA | 2654 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 44d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2022 |
| 17817518 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USER INTERFACES FOR ENABLING TASK DELEGATION CONTROLS | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 3624 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2022 |
| 17817500 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING LIKELIHOOD OF TASK DELEGATION | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 3624 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial