Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/932,917

NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND ENERGY DEVICE USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Mu Ionic Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
17%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
-2%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 17% of cases
17%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 12 resolved
-48.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -18% lift
Without
With
+-18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
67
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 12 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group III, an energy device comprising an organophosphate-based compound wherein the negative electrode comprises a negative electrode active material containing a silicon atom in the reply filed on 09/16/2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the office action fails to provide evidence of the utilities of the subgroups (Remarks 09/16/2025 pp. 3 ¶2 ). Applicant’s Example 1 (paragraphs [0252-0255] of the instant specification) demonstrates utility of Group I (claims 1-8), a non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprising a compound represented by formula A2 in a battery where only a carbonaceous material is used as the negative electrode active material ([0252]). Group II (claim 9) has utility as a flame retardant; Henningson (KR20140041684A, see attached machine translation) teaches utility of a similar class of chemicals (halogenated phosphonates, i.e., phosphonic acid esters) for the use in flame retardants for polymers (Henningson [0009]). Applicant further cites a lack of search burden (Remarks 09/16/2025 pp. 3 ¶2). This is not found persuasive because the inventions of each group are still drawn to separate classifications and require a separate field of search; Group I is drawn to H01G11/64; Group II is drawn to C07F9/65742; Group III is drawn to H01M4/386 (MPEP 808.02). Claims 1-9 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Group I (a non-aqueous electrolytic solution) and Group II (organophosphate compound), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 09/16/2025. Applicant's election with traverse of an energy device comprising the species represented by chemical formula B-58 of the compounds presented in pages 55-62 of the instant specification in the reply filed on 09/29/2025 has been acknowledged. The traversal is on the grounds that the members of Species 2 are not patentably distinct (Remarks 09/29/2025 pp. 2 ¶2). While this argument has been considered, it has not been found persuasive as the different species of claim 2 are still demonstrated to have different performance; as non-limiting examples, the species of Applicant’s Example 13 (Instant specification, [0308]) is shown to have improved capacity retention over the species Example 11 ([0303]) and significantly inferior capacity retention compared to the species of Example 12 ([0307]) (pp. 206 Table 5). Additionally, species with hydrogen atoms substituted with halogens in the tetravalent alkyl group forming rings with the phosphate ester are indicated by the specification as having improved charge/discharge performance, while species without this substitution are easier to produce and store ([0028]), these properties of different species being mutually exclusive. Furthermore, the evidence of record does not appear to show that they are obvious variants. PNG media_image1.png 695 260 media_image1.png Greyscale Elected species B-58 (3,9-difluoro-2,4,8,10-tetraoxa-3,9-diphosphaspiro[5,5]undecane 3,9-dioxide) Applicant further cites a lack of search burden (Remarks 09/29/2025 pp. 2 ¶3-5). This is not found persuasive as a search for members of Species 2 such as species B-58 (see above) where the tetravalent alkyl group has no halogen substitution (improving production and storage properties) would not necessarily uncover results for species wherein the tetravalent alkyl group has halogen substitution to improve the charge/discharge performance ([0028]). Furthermore, no evidence of record indicates that the species are obvious variants. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 11-13 and 15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected member of Species 2, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 09/26/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10, 14, 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (JP2019153443A, cited in IDS filed 11/28/2022; see attached machine translation) Regarding claims 10, 14, 16, Zhang discloses an energy device (“lithium secondary battery”, [0012]) comprising: a positive electrode capable of absorbing and releasing metal ions ([0012]); a negative electrode capable of absorbing and releasing metal ions ([0012]); and a non-aqueous electrolytic solution ([0012]); wherein the negative electrode comprises a negative electrode active material containing a silicon atom (“silicon, silicon alloys”, [0086]); and wherein the non-aqueous electrolytic solution is a non- aqueous electrolytic solution containing the following compound (pp. 10, [0041]): PNG media_image2.png 379 560 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Zhang formula a-8 wherein, in general formula (B2) (see claim 10), X2’ and X3’ represent a fluorine atom (claims 10,16), and Z represents a tetravalent alkyl group in which the number of carbon atoms forming rings together with a part of a halogenated phosphate ester is 5 (claims 10, 14). Regarding claim 17, Zhang discloses the energy device according to claim 10, wherein the non-aqueous electrolytic solution comprises at least one compound (“other additive”, [0042]) selected from the group consisting of a saturated cyclic carbonate (“ethylene carbonate”, [0064]), a chain carbonate ([0067]), a chain carboxylate ester (“1,1-dicyanoethyl acetate”, [0050]), a cyclic carboxylate ester (“cyclic carboxylic acid esters”, [0062]), an ether compound ([0068-0069]) and a sulfone compound ([0068]). Regarding claim 18, Zhang discloses the energy device according to claim 10, wherein the total content of the compounds represented by the general formula B2 is 0.001-10% by mass with respect to the total amount of non- aqueous electrolytic solution ([0041]), which falls within the claimed range of 0.001% by mass or more and 30% by mass or less. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EVERETT T CHOI whose telephone number is (703)756-1331. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11:00-8:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan G Leong can be reached on (571) 270 1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.C./Examiner, Art Unit 1751 /JONATHAN G LEONG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1751 1/14/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494537
BATTERY MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12381237
FUEL CELL STACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 05, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
17%
Grant Probability
-2%
With Interview (-18.2%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 12 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month