Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

Mu Ionic Solutions Corporation

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
7
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (86%)
§102 only1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WANG, EUGENIA 2 54.4% +34.9%
CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG 1 45.7% +7.2%
WEINER, LAURA S 1 85.2% +14.3%
MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 1 45.0% +29.7%
CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY 1 11.8% -14.3%
LI, AIQUN 1 64.0% +22.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18397118 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME WEINER, LAURA S 30d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17932917 NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND ENERGY DEVICE USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY 28d overdue

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18118320 Non-Aqueous Liquid Electrolyte, and Non-Aqueous Liquid-Electrolyte Secondary Cell in Which Said Non-Aqueous Liquid Electrolyte is Used MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 66d overdue
17035818 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA 36d overdue
18397118 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME WEINER, LAURA S 30d overdue
18529463 NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE WANG, EUGENIA
17837270 Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution and Energy Device LI, AIQUN

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1751 2
1723 1
1752 1
1766 1
1759 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18413101 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ENERGY DEVICE CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG 1751 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 16, 2024
18397118 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAME WEINER, LAURA S 1723 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Dec 27, 2023
18529463 NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE WANG, EUGENIA §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 05, 2023
18118320 Non-Aqueous Liquid Electrolyte, and Non-Aqueous Liquid-Electrolyte Secondary Cell in Which Said Non-Aqueous Liquid Electrolyte is Used MCNULTY, SEAMUS PATRICK 1752 §103 Final Rejection 66d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2023
17932917 NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE AND ENERGY DEVICE USING SAID NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE CHOI, EVERETT TIMOTHY 1751 §102 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Sep 16, 2022
17837270 Non-Aqueous Electrolyte Solution and Energy Device LI, AIQUN 1766 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 10, 2022
17035818 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE BATTERY WANG, EUGENIA 1759 §103 Final Rejection 36d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2020

Managing Mu Ionic Solutions Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month