Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/938,296

SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 05, 2022
Examiner
ISAAC, STANETTA D
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
48%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
811 granted / 948 resolved
+17.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -38% lift
Without
With
+-37.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
1005
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 948 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed on 1/30/26. Response to Amendment Applicant's request for reconsideration of the finality of the rejection of the last Office action is persuasive and, therefore, the finality of that action is withdrawn. The indicated allowability of claims 2, 4 and 5 is withdrawn in view of the newly discovered reference(s) to Tatsumi et al. (US PGPub 2018/0190611) in view of Akino (US PGPub 2012/0248618). Rejections based on the newly cited reference(s) follow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tatsumi et al. (US PGPub 2018/0190611, hereinafter referred to as “Tatsumi”) in view of Akino (US PGPub 2012/0248618, hereinafter referred to as “Akino”). Tatsumi discloses the semiconductor apparatus substantially as claimed. See figures 1-13 and corresponding text, where Tatsumi teaches, in claim 1, a semiconductor apparatus comprising: an insulating substrate (2); (figure 1; [0028]) a porous material (3) directly bonded to the insulating substrate (2); (figure 1; [0030-0031]) and a semiconductor device (4, 5) bonded to the porous material (3), (figure 1; [0028]) wherein the porous material (3) has at least one recess (portions 3a and 3b) on its bonding surface to the bonding material (joint layer) (figure 1; [0032]) However, Tatsumi fails to show, in claim 1, via a bonding material containing metal nanoparticles, wherein holes in the porous material have a pore size not more than the size of the metal nanoparticles contained in the bonding material. Akino teaches, in claim 1, via a bonding material (P2) containing metal nanoparticles (12) wherein holes (14) in the porous material (P1) have a pore size not more than the size of the metal nanoparticles (12) contained in the bonding material (P2) (figure 13; [0043], conductive paste used for wire bonding [0045-0046], particle diameter of the nanoparticles and the interparticle voids (14)(implied holes) are smaller than the nanoparticles (12)). (See modified illustration below.) PNG media_image1.png 750 1090 media_image1.png Greyscale In addition, Akino provides the advantages of preventing the generation of cracks within the pads by reducing the stress using a porous metal film material ([0008-0009]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to incorporate via a bonding material containing metal nanoparticles, wherein holes in the porous material have a pore size not more than the size of the metal nanoparticles contained in the bonding material, in the apparatus of Tatsumi, according to the teachings of Akino, with the motivation of preventing the generation of cracks within the pads by reducing the stress. Tatsumi in view of Akino shows, in claim 3, wherein the porous material has at least one projection on its bonding surface to the bonding material (figure 1; [0028-0035]). Tatsumi in view of Akino shows, in claim 4, wherein the at least one recess comprises recesses respectively positioned just below four corners of the semiconductor device (figure 1; [0028-0035]). Tatsumi in view of Akino shows, in claim 5, wherein the at least one projection comprises projections respectively positioned just below four corners of the semiconductor device (figures 1 and 2; [0028-0035]). Tatsumi in view of Akino shows, in claim 6, wherein the semiconductor device is formed of a wide bandgap semiconductor ([0035]). Tatsumi in view of Akino shows, in claim 7, wherein the wide bandgap semiconductor is silicon carbide, a gallium nitride-based material, or diamond ([0035]). Tatsumi shows, in claim 8, a semiconductor apparatus comprising: an insulating substrate (2); a porous material (3) directly bonded to the insulating substrate (2); and a semiconductor device (4, 5) bonded to the porous material (3) via a bonding material containing metal nanoparticles, wherein the porous material (3) has at least one recess (3a, 3b) on its bonding surface to the bonding material (figure 1; [0028-0032]). However, Tatsumi fails to show, in claim 8, wherein holes of the porous material are connected to a surface of an outer periphery of the porous material,. Akino teaches, in claim 8, wherein holes (14) of the porous material (P2) are connected to a surface (9) of an outer periphery (the side portions touch the protective film (9)) material of the porous material (P1) (figure 13; [0043], conductive paste used for wire bonding [0045-0046], the interparticle voids (14)(implied holes)). (See modified illustration below.) PNG media_image1.png 750 1090 media_image1.png Greyscale In addition, Akino provides the advantages of preventing the generation of cracks within the pads by reducing the stress using a porous metal film material ([0008-0009]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention, to incorporate wherein holes of the porous material are connected to a surface of an outer periphery of the porous material, in the apparatus of Tatsumi, according to the teachings of Akino, with the motivation of preventing the generation of cracks within the pads by reducing the stress. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANETTA D ISAAC whose telephone number is (571)272-1671. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Leonard Chang can be reached at 571-270-3691. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STANETTA D ISAAC/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 February 2, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 05, 2022
Application Filed
May 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 12, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604706
APPARATUS INCLUDING TRANSPARENT MATERIAL FOR TRANSPARENT PROCESS PERFORMANCE AND METHOD USING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604715
ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593714
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BONDING ENHANCEMENT LAYER AND METHOD OF FORMING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593496
Multiple Threshold Voltage Implementation Through Lanthanum Incorporation
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581981
Method of Forming an Interconnection between an Electric Component and an Electronic Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
48%
With Interview (-37.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 948 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month