Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/946,147

DOUBLE-SIDED EMBEDDED MEMORY ARRAY

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
LINDSEY, COLE LEON
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
103 granted / 116 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
150
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
55.8%
+15.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 116 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see section titled “Rejections under 35 U.S.C. 102,” filed 01/22/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C 102 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Huang et al. (US20220199624A1, hereinafter Huang). Regarding claim 1, Huang discloses a semiconductor structure comprising: a first memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10); and a second memory array directly connected to the first memory array by nanosheet stacks (Fig. 3A, par. 30 backside bit cell 20 connected to frontside bit cell through transistor stack structure 30 “has a GAA transistor architecture with a plurality of stacked channel regions 105”); and backside contacts (Fig. 3A backside interconnect 182), wherein a gate contact is horizontally between source/drain (S/D) contacts in the first memory array and S/D contacts in the second memory array (Fig. 3A gate electrode 110 is horizontally between source/drain regions 106 in both frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20). See below for full claims mapping on the remaining claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-12, and 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by Huang (US20220199624A1). Regarding claim 1, Huang discloses a semiconductor structure comprising: a first memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10); and a second memory array directly connected to the first memory array by nanosheet stacks (Fig. 3A, par. 30 backside bit cell 20 connected to frontside bit cell through transistor stack structure 30 “has a GAA transistor architecture with a plurality of stacked channel regions 105”); and backside contacts (Fig. 3A backside interconnect 182), wherein a gate contact is horizontally between source/drain (S/D) contacts in the first memory array and S/D contacts in the second memory array (Fig. 3A gate electrode 110 is horizontally between source/drain regions 106 in both frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20). Regarding claim 2, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the first and second memory arrays collectively define a double-sided memory array on a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) wafer (Par. 28 teaches that “[f]abrication of double-sided, or “double-layered” stacked memory may leverage monolithic stacked transistor structures that include GAA, stacked RoW channels, which are also suitable for advanced logic (CMOS) circuitry” and “[s]tacked transistor structures suitable for advanced CMOS may be further leveraged in double-sided DRAM architectures through the application of backside transistor interconnect technology”). Regarding claim 4, Huang discloses The semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the backside contacts are through silicon vias (TSV) (Figs. 1, 3A see substrate region 103 below lower transistor 102 wherein backside interconnect 182 is disposed and so the backside interconnect is also a TSV). Regarding claim 5, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the nanosheet stacks separate the first memory array from the second memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20 are separated from each other by transistor stack structure 30). Regarding claim 6, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the nanosheet stacks are separated from each other by source/drain (S/D) regions (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20 are separated from each other by source/drain region 106). Regarding claim 7, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein the S/D contacts in the first memory array are vertically offset from the S/D contacts in the second memory array (Fig. 3A frontside source/drain contact 161 upper transistor 101 are vertically offset from backside source/drain contacts 108 in lower transistor 101). Regarding claim 8, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 7, wherein the S/D contacts in the first memory array and the S/D contacts in the second memory array are vertically offset from the nanosheet stacks (Fig. 3A frontside source/drain contact 161 and backside contacts 108 are vertically offset from channel regions 105). Regarding claim 9, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 1, wherein top surfaces of the nanosheet stacks directly contact gate contacts extending into the first memory array (Fig. 3A top surface of topmost channel region 105 contacts gate electrode 110 which extends into frontside bit cell 10) and bottom surfaces of the nanosheet stacks directly contact oxide layers placed adjacent the second memory array (Fig. 3A bottom surface of bottommost channel region 105 directly contacts gate dielectrics 217 which are placed adjacent to the backside bit cell 20). Regarding claim 10, Huang discloses a semiconductor structure comprising: a first memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10); and a second memory array integrated with the first memory array by at least a plurality of nanosheet stacks to define a single complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) chip (Fig. 3A, par. 30 backside bit cell 20 connected to frontside bit cell through transistor stack structure 30 “has a GAA transistor architecture with a plurality of stacked channel regions 105” and par. 28 teaches that Par. 28 teaches that “[f]abrication of double-sided, or “double-layered” stacked memory may leverage monolithic stacked transistor structures that include GAA, stacked RoW channels, which are also suitable for advanced logic (CMOS) circuitry” and “[s]tacked transistor structures suitable for advanced CMOS may be further leveraged in double-sided DRAM architectures through the application of backside transistor interconnect technology”), wherein a gate contact is horizontally between source/drain (S/D) contacts in the first memory array and S/D contacts in the second memory array (Fig. 3A gate electrode 110 is horizontally between source/drain regions 106 in both frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20). Regarding claim 12, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 10, wherein the first and second memory arrays are further integrated by a plurality of backside contacts (Fig. 3A backside interconnect 182 and backside source/drain contacts 108). Regarding claim 14, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 10, wherein the nanosheet stacks separate the first memory array from the second memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20 are separated from each other by transistor stack structure 30). Regarding claim 15, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 10, wherein the nanosheet stacks are separated from each other by source/drain (S/D) regions (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20 are separated from each other by source/drain region 106). Regarding claim 16, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 10, wherein the S/D contacts in the first memory array are vertically offset from the S/D contacts in the second (Fig. 3A frontside source/drain contact 161 upper transistor 101 are vertically offset from backside source/drain contacts 108 in lower transistor 101). Regarding claim 17, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 16, wherein the S/D contacts in the first memory array and the S/D contacts in the second memory array are vertically offset from the nanosheet stacks (Fig. 3A frontside source/drain contact 161 and backside contacts 108 are vertically offset from channel regions 105). Regarding claim 18, Huang discloses the semiconductor structure of claim 10, wherein top surfaces of the nanosheet stacks directly contact gate contacts extending into the first memory array (Fig. 3A top surface of topmost channel region 105 contacts gate electrode 110 which extends into frontside bit cell 10) and bottom surfaces of the nanosheet stacks directly contact oxide layers placed adjacent the second memory (Fig. 3A bottom surface of bottommost channel region 105 directly contacts gate dielectrics 217 which are placed adjacent to the backside bit cell 20). Regarding claim 19, Huang discloses a method comprising: forming a first set of source/drain (S/D) contacts (Fig. 3A source/drain regions 106 within upper transistor 101) within a silicon on insulator (SOI) layer of a wafer (Par. 35 “channel regions 105 were formed from a semiconductor layer of an semiconductor-on-insulator (SOI) substrate” and so it is formed within an SOI layer of a wafer); forming nanosheet stacks over portions of the SOI layer (Fig. 3A channel regions 105 and par. 35 teaches that “channel regions 105 were formed from a semiconductor layer of an semiconductor-on-insulator (SOI) substrate”); constructing a first memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10); flipping the wafer; removing the portions of the SOI layer (Fig. 6 steps 610-630 comprise flipping wafer and then subsequently removing backside portions of the substrate to form backside contacts); constructing a second memory array (Fig. 3A backside bit cell 20); and re-flipping the wafer so that the second memory array is integrated with the first memory array by at least the nanosheet stacks to define a single complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) chip (Fig. 3A shows a completed device with two memory arrays in frontstide bit 10 and backside bit 20 in an upright configuration and par. 28 teaches that “[f]abrication of double-sided, or “double-layered” stacked memory may leverage monolithic stacked transistor structures that include GAA, stacked RoW channels, which are also suitable for advanced logic (CMOS) circuitry” and “[s]tacked transistor structures suitable for advanced CMOS may be further leveraged in double-sided DRAM architectures through the application of backside transistor interconnect technology”). Regarding claim 20, Huang discloses the method of claim 19, wherein the nanosheet stacks separate the first memory array from the second memory array (Fig. 3A frontside bit cell 10 and backside bit cell 20 are separated from each other by transistor stack structure 30). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang in view of Wang et al. (US20190386062A1, hereinafter Wang). Regarding claim 3, Huang teaches the semiconductor structure of claim 1. Huang does not appear to teach wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device. Wang teaches wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device (Wang fig. 3C SHE-MRAM 342 is a different type of memory device than STT-MRAM 360). Being in analogous arts, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Huang with the teachings of Wang because as both Huang and Wang teach suitable configurations for use in a DRAM device, it would have been obvious to substitute Huang’s configuration where the first and second memory arrays are the same type of memory devices with Wang’s configuration where the first and second memory arrays are SHE-MRAM and STT-MRAM to achieve the predictable result of forming a memory device wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device. Regarding claim 13, Huang teaches the semiconductor structure of claim 10. Huang does not appear to teach wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device. Wang teaches wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device (Wang fig. 3C SHE-MRAM 342 is a different type of memory device than STT-MRAM 360). Being in analogous arts, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Huang with the teachings of Wang because as both Huang and Wang teach suitable configurations for use in a DRAM device, it would have been obvious to substitute Huang’s configuration where the first and second memory arrays are the same type of memory devices with Wang’s configuration where the first and second memory arrays are SHE-MRAM and STT-MRAM to achieve the predictable result of forming a memory device wherein the first memory array is a first type of memory device and the second memory array is a second type of memory device different than the first type of memory device. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COLE LEON LINDSEY whose telephone number is (571)272-4028. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COLE LEON LINDSEY/Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /CHRISTINE S. KIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 05, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 14, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593630
PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A SILICON CARBIDE DEVICE AND SILICON CARBIDE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575330
ORDERED ALLOY MAGNETIC TUNNEL JUNCTION WITH SIMPLIFIED SEED STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12550407
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH BACKSIDE VIA AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543538
TEMPORARY FIXATION LAYERED FILM AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFOR, TEMPORARY FIXATION LAYERED BODY, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PRODUCTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12532501
STRUCTURE WITH BACK-GATE HAVING OPPOSITELY DOPED SEMICONDUCTOR REGIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month