Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/947,071

FERRORELECTRIC FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR (FEFET) DEVICES WITH LOW OPERATING VOLTAGE CAPABILITIES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 16, 2022
Examiner
AHMED, SHAHED
Art Unit
2813
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allow Rate
866 granted / 955 resolved
+22.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 955 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This action is responsive to application No. 17947071 filed on 09/16/2022. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of 10-34 in the reply filed on 12/23/2024 is acknowledged. Allowable subject matter Claims 12-14, 28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim (independent claims 10 & 26), but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art known to the Examiner is listed on the PTO 892 forms of record. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Kijima et al. (US 2007/0126042). With respect to dependent claims 12-14, the cited prior art does not anticipate or make obvious, inter alia, the step of: “a first dielectric material on the first source/drain material, wherein a portion of the first source/drain material is between the first dielectric material and the semiconductor channel material layer; and a second dielectric material on the second source/drain material, wherein a portion of the second source/drain material is between the second dielectric material and the semiconductor channel material layer”. With respect to dependent claim 28, the cited prior art does not anticipate or make obvious, inter alia, the step of: “a first dielectric material on the first source/drain material, wherein a portion of the first source/drain material is between the first dielectric material and the semiconductor channel material layer; and a second dielectric material on the second source/drain material, wherein a portion of the second source/drain material is between the second dielectric material and the semiconductor channel material layer”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 10-11, 15-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kijima et al. (US 2007/0126042). Regarding independent claim 10, Kijima et al. teach a transistor device comprising: a substrate (Fig. 3, element 10, paragraph 0128); a semiconductor channel material layer (Fig. 3, element 50, paragraph 0128) on the substrate; a first source/drain material (Fig. 3, element 40, paragraph 0128) on a first side of the semiconductor channel material layer; a second source/drain material (Fig. 3, element 42, paragraph 0128) on a second side of the semiconductor channel material layer opposite the first side; a ferroelectric (FE) material layer (Fig. 3, element 30, paragraph 0128) on the semiconductor channel material layer and between the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material; and a gate material (Fig. 3, element 20, paragraph 0128) on the FE material layer; wherein a first portion of the FE material layer is directly between the gate material and the first source/drain material, and a second portion of the FE material layer is directly between the gate material and the second source/drain material (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 11, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material is further on the first source/drain material, and further on the second source/drain material (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 15, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes a perovskite material (paragraph 0092). Regarding claim 16, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes one or more of Barium, Titanium, Zirconium, Calcium, Strontium, Lanthanum, Bismuth, Iron, Cobalt, Lithium, Niobium, Potassium, and Oxygen (paragraph 0092). Regarding claim 17, Kijima et al. teach wherein the semiconductor channel material layer includes one or more of Barium, Tin, Lanthanum, Neodymium, Strontium, Titanium, Indium, Gallium, Zinc, Nickel, and Oxygen (paragraph 0095). Regarding claim 18, Kijima et al. teach wherein the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material each comprise one or more of Strontium, Ruthenium, Barium, Lanthanum, Tin, Manganese, Cobalt, Nickel, Yttrium, Copper, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Platinum, Iridium, Palladium, Tungsten, and Oxygen (paragraph 0090, 0094). Claims 19-21, 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al. (US 2025/0169097). Regarding independent claim 19, Wang et al. teach a transistor device comprising: a substrate (Fig. 7A, element substrate, paragraph 0085); a semiconductor channel material layer (Fig. 7A, element semiconductor, paragraph 0085) on the substrate; a first source/drain material (Fig. 7A, element S, paragraph 0085) on the substrate adjacent the semiconductor material layer; a second source/drain material (Fig. 7A, element D, paragraph 0085) on the substrate adjacent the semiconductor material layer and on an opposite side of the semiconductor channel material layer from the first source/drain material; a ferroelectric (FE) material layer (Fig. 7A, element Sc.sub.xAl.sub.1-xN, paragraph 0085) on the semiconductor channel material layer; and a gate material (Fig. 7A, element Gate, paragraph 0085) on the FE material layer, wherein a length of contact between the FE material layer and the gate material is less than a length of contact between the semiconductor channel material layer and the FE material layer (Fig. 7A). Regarding claim 20, Wang et al. teach wherein the FE material is further on a portion of the first source/drain material and on a portion of the second source/drain material (Fig. 7A discloses a portion of the FE material above and in contact with a portion of the first and second source/drain material). Regarding claim 21, Wang et al. teach wherein the first source/drain material is further on a portion of the semiconductor channel material layer, the second source/drain material is further on a portion of the semiconductor channel material layer, and a portion of the FE material layer is between the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material (Fig. 7A discloses a portion of the first and second source/drain material above and in contact with the FE material). Regarding claim 24, Wang et al. teach wherein the semiconductor channel material layer includes one or more of Barium, Tin, Lanthanum, Neodymium, Strontium, Titanium, Indium, Gallium, Zinc, Nickel, and Oxygen (paragraph 0062). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 22-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US 2025/0169097). Regarding claim 22, Wang et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes a perovskite material (Before the effective filling date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to select a known ferroelectric material such as perovskite as disclosed in paragraph 0099, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the base of its suitability, for its intended use involves only ordinary skill in the art. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). Regarding claim 23, Wang et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes one or more of Barium, Titanium, Zirconium, Calcium, Strontium, Lanthanum, Bismuth, Iron, Cobalt, Lithium, Niobium, Potassium, and Oxygen (Before the effective filling date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to select a known ferroelectric material such as perovskite as disclosed in paragraph 0099, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the base of its suitability, for its intended use involves only ordinary skill in the art. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416). Claim 25 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US 2025/0169097) in view of Kijima et al. (US 2007/0126042). Regarding claim 25, Wang et al. teach all of the limitations as discussed above. Wang et al. do not explicitly disclose wherein the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material each comprise one or more of Strontium, Ruthenium, Barium, Lanthanum, Tin, Manganese, Cobalt, Nickel, Yttrium, Copper, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Platinum, Iridium, Palladium, Tungsten, and Oxygen. Before the effective filling date of the invention it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to select a known ferroelectric material such as iridium as disclosed in paragraph 0090, 0094 of Kijima, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the base of its suitability, for its intended use involves only ordinary skill in the art. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 Claims 26-27, 29-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kijima et al. (US 2007/0126042). Regarding Independent claim 26, Kijima et al. teach an integrated circuit device comprising: a plurality of transistors (Fig. 3, element 200, paragraph 0127 discloses a transistor. Fig. 7 in an embodiment of manufacturing discloses a plurality of transistors) on a substrate (Fig. 3, element 10, paragraph 0128), each transistor comprising: a semiconductor channel material (Fig. 3, element 50, paragraph 0128) layer on the substrate; a first source/drain material (Fig. 3, element 40, paragraph 0128) on a first side of the semiconductor channel material layer; a second source/drain material (Fig. 3, element 42, paragraph 0128) on a second side of the semiconductor channel material layer opposite the first side; a ferroelectric (FE) material layer (Fig. 3, element 30, paragraph 0128) on the semiconductor channel material layer and between the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material; and a gate material (Fig. 3, element 20, paragraph 0128) on the FE material layer; wherein a first portion of the FE material layer is directly between the gate material and the first source/drain material, and a second portion of the FE material layer is directly between the gate material and the second source/drain material (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 27, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material of each transistor is further on the first source/drain material and further on the second source/drain material (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 29, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes a perovskite material (paragraph 0092). Regarding claim 30, Kijima et al. teach wherein the FE material layer includes one or more of Barium, Titanium, Zirconium, Calcium, Strontium, Lanthanum, Bismuth, Iron, Cobalt, Lithium, Niobium, Potassium, and Oxygen (paragraph 0092). Regarding claim 31, Kijima et al. teach wherein the semiconductor channel material layer includes one or more of Barium, Tin, Lanthanum, Neodymium, Strontium, Titanium, Indium, Gallium, Zinc, Nickel, and Oxygen (paragraph 0095). Regarding claim 32, Kijima et al. teach wherein the first source/drain material and the second source/drain material each comprise one or more of Strontium, Ruthenium, Barium, Lanthanum, Tin, Manganese, Cobalt, Nickel, Yttrium, Copper, Vanadium, Molybdenum, Platinum, Iridium, Palladium, Tungsten, and Oxygen (paragraph 0090, 0094). Regarding claim 33, Kijima et al. teach wherein the substrate comprises one or more of Strontium, Titanium, Dysprosium, Gadolinium, Scandium, and Oxygen (paragraph 0089). Regarding claim 34, Kijima et al. teach comprising an integrated circuit die (Fig. 7, element 200) and a package substrate (Fig. 7, element 10), the integrated circuit die comprising the plurality of transistors (Fig. 7). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAHED AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-3477. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Gauthier can be reached on 571-270-0373. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAHED AHMED/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2813
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 16, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 17, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604673
JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604589
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604498
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604502
NANOCHANNEL GALLIUM NITRIDE-BASED DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598762
METHODS OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LOCAL ISOLATION AND A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH LOCAL ISOLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+0.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 955 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month