Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 17/952,098

QUALITY CONTROL TEMPLATES ENSURING VALIDITY OF SEQUENCING-BASED ASSAYS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 23, 2022
Priority
Jan 05, 2018 — provisional 62/614,236 +1 more
Examiner
ZHANG, KAIJIANG
Art Unit
1684
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Billiontoone Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
543 granted / 704 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
729
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§103
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 704 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election of Group II (claims 8-16), with the species recited in claim 10 as the elected species (thus claim 12 is withdrawn as being drawn to a non-elected species), in the reply filed on 6/25/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). 3. Claims 1-16 are pending in the application. Claims 1-7 and 12 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claims 8-11 and 13-16 are currently under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tourlousse et al. (Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45(4):e23, published online 15 December 2016). Regarding claim 8 Tourlousse et al. teach a method for identifying contamination associated with at least one of sequencing library preparation and high throughput sequencing, the method comprising: generating a set of quality control template (QCT) molecules (e.g., spike-in standards), each QCT molecule (e.g., spike-in standard) comprising: a target-associated region (e.g., conserved region) with sequence similarity to a target sequence region (e.g., natural 16S rRNA sequence region) of a biological target, and a variation region (e.g., artificial variable region) with sequence dissimilarity to a sequence region of the biological target; and computationally determining a set of QCT sequence read clusters based on the variation regions of the set of QCT molecules, wherein the set of QCT sequence read clusters comprises QCT molecule sequence reads derived from the high throughput sequencing corresponding to a set of QCT mixtures generated based on the set of QCT molecules and a set of samples comprising the biological target, and wherein the sequencing library preparation comprises co-amplification, of the set of QCT molecules and nucleic acid molecules comprising the biological target, based on the sequence similarity of the target-associated region and the target sequence region of the biological target; and based on the set of QCT sequence read clusters, determining a contamination parameter describing the contamination associated with the at least one of the sequencing library preparation and the high throughput sequencing (see the whole document, particularly Abstract; page 2, column 1, paragraphs 2-3; page 4, paragraph spanning columns 1-2; paragraph bridging pages 4-5; page 5, column 2, paragraphs 1-3; page 7, column 1, paragraph 2 – page 8, column 1, paragraph 4; page 8, column 2, paragraphs 2-4; page 11, column 1, paragraph 3 – column 2, paragraph 2; page 12, column 2, paragraph 2; Figure 1). Regarding claim 15 The method according to Tourlousse et al., further comprising generating a single QCT library comprising the set of QCT molecules, wherein the single QCT library is adapted for deployment, at a single stage of the at least one of the sequencing library preparation and the high throughput sequencing, of less than 0.00001 nanograms of amplifiable QCT molecules for each sample of the set of samples (see page 2, column 2, last paragraph, where 7.6[Symbol font/0xB4]101 copies/PCR reaction would translate to less than 0.00001 nanograms of amplifiable QCT molecules, as evidenced by paragraph [0047] of the specification as filed). Allowable Subject Matter 7. Claims 9-11, 13-14 and 16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 8. No claim is currently allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAIJIANG ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-5207. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heather Calamita can be reached on 571-272-2876. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAIJIANG ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1684
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 23, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747473
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ACCURATELY IDENTIFYING MUTATIONS
5y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742167
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BIOMOLECULE RETENTION
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12723283
Combination of Soybean Whole Genome SNP Loci, Gene Chip and Application Thereof
5y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724023
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ASSEMBLY OF BIOLOGICAL NANOPORES
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698466
NANOPARTICLES BASED METHOD FOR SCREENING ENZYME OR MICROORGANISM
5y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.4%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month