Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Billiontoone Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Billiontoone Inc. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 3 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, suggesting a relatively focused portfolio that nonetheless touches on different specialized areas of biotechnology. The use of 2 distinct art units means that the company's applications are being evaluated by at least two different groups of experts at the patent office. Practitioners must be prepared to address the specific standards of each of the distinct art units.

The 3 pending office actions are being reviewed by 3 distinct examiners. This indicates that each of the pending office actions is being handled by a different individual, providing a variety of examiner perspectives. VANORE, DAVID A is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 distinct examiners for the 3 pending office actions, each examiner is responsible for exactly one pending action. This distribution requires the legal team to manage three separate prosecution tracks simultaneously.

Practitioners should be aware that the 3 pending office actions are distributed across the art units and examiners. This means that while there may be some overlap in art unit standards, the individual examiner styles will vary for each case. VANORE, DAVID A and the other examiners each hold 1 pending office action, requiring the legal team to manage separate prosecution tracks within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. Success depends on coordinating efforts across the 2 distinct art units while respecting the unique approach of each of the 3 distinct examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VANORE, DAVID A 1 88.9% +7.5%
ZHANG, KAIJIANG 1 77.1% +34.4%
CASH, KAILEY ELIZABETH 1 28.6% +64.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18943785 TARGET-ASSOCIATED MOLECULES FOR CHARACTERIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH BIOLOGICAL TARGETS VANORE, DAVID A —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17702708 FRAGMENT ANALYSIS FOR QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSTICS OF BIOLOGICAL TARGETS CASH, KAILEY ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17952098 QUALITY CONTROL TEMPLATES ENSURING VALIDITY OF SEQUENCING-BASED ASSAYS ZHANG, KAIJIANG —
17702708 FRAGMENT ANALYSIS FOR QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSTICS OF BIOLOGICAL TARGETS CASH, KAILEY ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1684 1
1683 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18943785 TARGET-ASSOCIATED MOLECULES FOR CHARACTERIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH BIOLOGICAL TARGETS VANORE, DAVID A — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 11, 2024
17952098 QUALITY CONTROL TEMPLATES ENSURING VALIDITY OF SEQUENCING-BASED ASSAYS ZHANG, KAIJIANG 1684 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2022
17702708 FRAGMENT ANALYSIS FOR QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSTICS OF BIOLOGICAL TARGETS CASH, KAILEY ELIZABETH 1683 §103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Mar 23, 2022

Managing Billiontoone Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month