Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/955,187

SELF-ALIGNMENT LAYER WITH LOW-K MATERIAL PROXIMATE TO VIAS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 28, 2022
Examiner
GREWAL, HEIM KIRIN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allow Rate
23 granted / 25 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
54
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 25 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims The following is in response to the communication filed 12/29/2025. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claims 1 and 7 have been amended. Claims 13-20 have been withdrawn. Claims 1-12 have been examined. Election/Restriction Applicant’s election without traverse of 1-12 of Group I in the reply filed on 12/29/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 13-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang US 20230068625 A1 (hereinafter Wang) in view of Chang US 20150171081 A1 (herein after Chang). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses: An integrated circuit (IC) die, (Wang, Fig. 20) comprising: a first layer (Fig. 20, layer including dielectric material 320, conductive feature 330, and bonding layer 170.) with one or more conductive structures (conductive feature 330) in a first interlayer dielectric material, (dielectric material 320).) with at least a portion of the one or more conductive structures at a first surface of the first layer; (See Fig. 20.) a self-alignment layer in contact with non-conductive regions at the first surface of the first layer; (Fig. 19 and Fig. 20, second dielectric layer 340, first etch stop layer 360 and opening 390, where second dielectric layer 340 in contact with dielectric materials 320.) a second layer with second interlayer dielectric material in contact with the self-alignment layer and the portion of the one or more conductive structures at the first surface of the first layer; and (See Fig. 20, third dielectric layer 380 in contact with the second dielectric layer 340 and portion 372 is in contact with conductive feature 330 which goes through the opening 390. The third dielectric layer 380 is also in indirect contact with contact feature 332.) one or more conductive vias through the self-alignment layer and the second layer in respective contact with the portion of the one or more conductive structures at the first surface of the first layer, (See Fig. 10, conductive via 400.) wherein the self-alignment layer comprises a first material where the self-alignment layer is in contact with the one or more conductive vias (Fig. 20, second dielectric layer 340 is in contact with conductive via 400.) and … Wang does disclose a second material in the self-alignment layer such as etch stop layer 360 which is made from a high-k dielectric material ([0060]). While, the etch stop layer 360 does not contact conductive via 330, it does contact conductive via 332. Therefore, Wang does not appear to disclose where the second material of the self-alignment layer “is not in contact with the one or more conductive vias.” Chang, which teaches a method of self-alignment of two more layers (Chang, Abstract), discloses having a spacers 114 which are in the self-alignment layer (Embodiment 1 shown in Figs. 1A- 1N, specifically Fig. 1C, layer which includes ILD 116 and the alignment structure 112 and spacers 114.) The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride (SiON, [0021]) which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric. Wang, [0021].) This is made of different material the ILD 116 layer which is made of low-k dielectric. (Chang, [0023]) Therefore the device made by the combination of Wang and Chang would have resulted in a device with predictable characteristics as described by the claimed invention. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wang to have second material of the self-alignment layer is not in contact with the one or more conductive vias as taught by Chang for purposes of The ILD layer is able to be kept clean and fee of residue from other alignment structures that are formed in the ILD layer. (Chang, [0039].) Regarding claim 2, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 1. Wang further discloses: wherein the first material of the self-alignment layer comprises a low-k material ([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material. Therefore would have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9.) Chang further discloses: the second material of the self-alignment layer comprises a high- k material. (The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric.) Therefore would have a dielectric constant higher than 3.9.) Regarding claim 3, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 1. Wang further discloses: wherein a first dielectric constant of the first material of the self-alignment layer ([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material.) Chang further discloses: a second dielectric constant of the second material of the self-alignment layer. (The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric.)) The combination of Wang and Chang discloses that that the first dielectric material being made of a low-k dielectric material (materials that by necessity have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9) has lower dielectric constant than the high-k dielectric material (materials that by necessity have dielectric constant higher than 3.9.) of the second material. Regarding claim 4, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 3. Wang further discloses: wherein the first dielectric constant is 3.9 or lower. (([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material. Low-k dielectrics by necessity must have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9.) Regarding claim 5, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 4. Wang further discloses wherein the first material is air. (Fig. 19, There is no material in the opening 390 until the conductive via, therefore the first material is air.) Regarding claim 6, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 1. Wang further discloses: further comprising a non-conductive material (Wang, Fig. 20, first etch stop layer 360) in the second layer between respective walls of the second interlayer dielectric material (third dielectric material 380) and respective walls of the one or more conductive vias. (conductive via (400).) Regarding claim 7, Wang discloses: A system, comprising: a substrate; (Wang, Fig. 20, wafer 310) a power supply; and (Wang, [0012], as there is a power distribution system, as part of the power distribution system there must by necessity be a power supply.) an integrated circuit (IC) die attached to the substrate and coupled to the power supply, (Wang, Fig. 20, [0052] the semiconductor is on the wafer 310.) the IC die comprising: a first layer (Fig. 20, layer including dielectric material 320, conductive feature 330, and bonding layer 170.) with one or more conductive structures (conductive feature 330) in a first interlayer dielectric material, (dielectric material 320).) with at least a portion of the one or more conductive structures at a first surface of the first layer; (See Fig. 20.) a self-alignment layer in contact with non-conductive regions at the first surface of the first layer; (Fig. 19 and Fig. 20, second dielectric layer 340, first etch stop layer 360 and opening 390, where second dielectric layer 340 in contact with dielectric materials 320.) a second layer with second interlayer dielectric material in contact with the self-alignment layer and the portion of the one or more conductive structures at the first surface of the first layer; and (See Fig. 20, third dielectric layer 380 in contact with the second dielectric layer 340 and portion 372 is in contact with conductive feature 330. The third dielectric layer 380 is also in indirect contact with contact feature 332.) one or more conductive vias through the self-alignment layer and the second layer in respective contact with the portion of the one or more conductive structures at the first surface of the first layer, (See Fig. 10, conductive via 400.) wherein the self-alignment layer comprises a first material where the self-alignment layer is in contact with the one or more conductive vias (Fig. 20, second dielectric layer 340 is in contact with conductive via 400.) and … Wang does disclose a second material in the self-alignment layer such as etch stop layer 360 which is made from a high-k dielectric material ([0060]). While, the etch stop layer 360 does not contact conductive via 330, it does contact conductive via 332. Therefore, Wang does not appear to disclose where the second material of the self-alignment layer “is not in contact with the one or more conductive vias.” Chang, which teaches a method of self-alignment of two more layers (Chang, Abstract), discloses having a spacers 114 which are in the self-alignment layer (Embodiment 1 shown in Figs. 1A- 1N, specifically Fig. 1C, layer which includes ILD 116 and the alignment structure 112 and spacers 114.) The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride (SiON, [0021]) which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric. Wang, [0021].) This is made of different material the ILD 116 layer which is made of low-k dielectric. (Chang, [0023]) Therefore the device made by the combination of Wang and Chang would have resulted in a device with predictable characteristics as described by the claimed invention. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wang to have second material of the self-alignment layer is not in contact with the one or more conductive vias as taught by Chang for purposes of The ILD layer is able to be kept clean and fee of residue from other alignment structures that are formed in the ILD layer. (Chang, [0039].) Regarding claim 8, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 7. Wang further discloses: wherein the first material of the self-alignment layer comprises a low-k material ([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material. Therefore would have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9.) Chang further discloses: the second material of the self-alignment layer comprises a high- k material. (The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric.) Therefore would have a dielectric constant higher than 3.9.) Regarding claim 9, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 7. Wang further discloses: wherein a first dielectric constant of the first material of the self-alignment layer ([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material.) Chang further discloses: a second dielectric constant of the second material of the self-alignment layer. (The spacer 114 is made of the same material as spacers 108. ([0024]) The spacer is made of silicon oxynitride which is a known high-k dielectric. (Wang discloses silicon oxynitride as high-k dielectric.)) The combination of Wang and Chang discloses that that the first dielectric material being made of a low-k dielectric material (materials that by necessity have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9) has lower dielectric constant than the high-k dielectric material (materials that by necessity have dielectric constant higher than 3.9.) of the second material. Regarding claim 10, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 9. Wang further discloses: wherein the first dielectric constant is 3.9 or lower. (([0054], second dielectric layer 340 is a low-k dielectric material. Low-k dielectrics by necessity must have a dielectric constant lower than 3.9.) Regarding claim 11, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 10. Wang further discloses wherein the first material is air. (Fig. 19, There is no material in the opening 390 until the conductive via, therefore the first material is air.) Regarding claim 12, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 7. Wang further discloses: further comprising a non-conductive material (Wang, Fig. 20, first etch stop layer 360) in the second layer between respective walls of the second interlayer dielectric material (third dielectric material 380) and respective walls of the one or more conductive vias. (conductive via (400).) Claims 5 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang as modified by Chang as applied to claims 4 and 10 above, and further in view of Yang US 20200124985 A1 (hereinafter Yang). Regarding claim 5, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 4. While Wang is considered to disclose that the first material is air. In the alternative, Yang, which teaches interconnect formation process (Yang, Abstract), discloses: wherein the first material is air. (Yang, Fig. 10, void 1010 being an “air-gap” in side the dielectric liner layer 1000.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wang as modified by Chang to have wherein the first material is air as taught by Yang for purposes of lowering the dielectric constant of the dielectric liner material. (Yang, [0040].) Regarding claim 11, Wang as modified by Chang disclose the elements of claim 10. While Wang is considered to disclose that the first material is air. In the alternative, Yang, which teaches interconnect formation process (Yang, Abstract), discloses: wherein the first material is air. (Yang, Fig. 10, void 1010 being an “air-gap” inside the dielectric liner layer 1000.) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the device of Wang as modified by Chang to have wherein the first material is air as taught by Yang for purposes of lowering the dielectric constant of the dielectric liner material. (Yang, [0040].) Prior Art Made of Record The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kantarovsky US 20220223694 A1 – Process Figs. 15A which has low-k material 105 and a second material 113 that acts as a protective plug for via for self-aligned material. Nakamura US 20150108604 A1 – Fig. 8, a semiconductor chip that is connected to a power supply IC. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HEIM KIRIN GREWAL whose telephone number is (703)756-1515. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVIENNE MONBLEAU can be reached at (571) 272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HEIM KIRIN GREWAL/ Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /DAVIENNE N MONBLEAU/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 28, 2022
Application Filed
Apr 26, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575175
MULTIPLE GATE-ALL-AROUND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH GATE SEPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575206
IMAGE SENSOR, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IMAGE SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING IMAGE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568620
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING NITRIDE SPACERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568683
SINGLE STACK DUAL CHANNEL GATE-ALL-AROUND NANOSHEET WITH STRAINED PFET AND BOTTOM DIELECTRIC ISOLATION NFET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12550344
SCHOTTKY DIODE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+0.6%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 25 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month