Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/956,798

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES WITH DIRECTIONAL ANTENNAS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 29, 2022
Examiner
WRIGHT, TUCKER J
Art Unit
2891
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
718 granted / 908 resolved
+11.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
943
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 908 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/7/2026 has been entered. -Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 8-9, 11, 13, and 22-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yen (US Pub. 2014/0239465). Regarding claim 8, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses a semiconductor package, comprising: a semiconductor die (111, paragraph [0034]); a conductive member (electrical connection connecting 115 to 111; paragraph [0034]) coupled to the semiconductor die and extending away from the semiconductor die; and a multi-layer package substrate including: a first horizontal metal layer (120, paragraph [0033]) to provide a ground connection; a second horizontal metal layer (140, paragraph [0036]) above (or overlapping) the first horizontal metal layer, the conductive member above (or overlapping) a plane along a top surface of the second horizontal member (conductive member is above a top surface of the second horizontal member when a top of the package is interpreted as being on the 110 side); vertical members (451/452, paragraph [0049]) coupling to the first and second horizontal metal layers; and a mold compound (130, paragraph [00354]) contacting portions of the second horizontal metal layer (e.g. see FIG. 1B), wherein: the first horizontal metal layer forms a conductive strip (115) coupled to the conductive member and capable of guiding an electromagnetic wave away from the conductive member; the first and second horizontal metal layers and the vertical members form a transition member (a portion of 150r near 151) coupled to the conductive strip, having a flared shape, and capable of guiding the electromagnetic wave away from the conductive strip, the first and second horizontal metal layers and the vertical members form a waveguide (an intermediate portion of 150r) coupled to the transition member, having a rectangular prism shape in a top cross-sectional view of the semiconductor package, and capable of guiding the electromagnetic wave away from the transition member, the first and second horizontal metal layers and the vertical members form a horn antenna (remainder of 150r) coupled to the waveguide and capable of directing the electromagnetic wave from the waveguide to a predetermined direction. Regarding claim 9, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the transition member comprises a first end coupled to the conductive strip and a second end coupled to the waveguide, the first end narrower than the second end. Regarding claim 11, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the vertical members include monolithic vertical members (each 451 and 452 is a single piece) that form parts of the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna. Regarding claim 13, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the mold compound contacts portions of the first horizontal metal layer and the vertical members (e.g. see FIG. 1B). Regarding claim 22, in FIGs. 1A-1C, 4A, and 4B, Yen discloses that a distal end of the horn antenna includes an orifice (150a, paragraph [0037]). Regarding claim 23, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses a semiconductor package, comprising: a semiconductor die (111); a conductive member (electrical connection connecting 115 to 111; paragraph [0034]) coupled to the semiconductor die; and a multi-layer package substrate including: a first horizontal metal layer (120, paragraph [0033]) to provide a ground connection; a second horizontal metal layer (140, paragraph [0036]) above (or overlapping) the first horizontal metal layer; vertical members (451/452) coupling to the first and second horizontal metal layers; and a mold compound (130) contacting the conductive member, the first and second horizontal metal layers and the vertical members (e.g. see FIG. 1B), wherein a portion of the first horizontal metal layer and a portion of the second horizontal metal layer is part of a horn antenna (portion of 150r), and wherein the conductive member is above (or overlapping) a plane along a top surface of the second horizontal metal layer (conductive member is above a top surface of the second horizontal member when a top of the package is interpreted as being on the 110 side). Regarding claim 24, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the first horizontal metal layer, the second horizontal metal layer, and the vertical members together form a structure including a conductive strip (115) coupled to the conductive member, a transition member coupled (a portion of 150r near 151) to the conductive strip, a waveguide (an intermediate portion of 150r) coupled to the transition member, and the horn antenna (remainder of 150r) coupled to the waveguide. Regarding claim 25, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the horn antenna and the transition member include a trapezoidal shape in a top cross-sectional view of the semiconductor package. Regarding claim 26, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the waveguide includes a prism shape in the top cross-sectional view of the semiconductor package. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6-7, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yen (US Pub. 2014/0239465) in view of Hsu (US Pub. No. 2019/0164916). Regarding claim 1, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses a semiconductor package, comprising: a semiconductor die (111, paragraph [0034]); a conductive member (electrical connection connecting 115 to 111; paragraph [0034]) coupled to the semiconductor die; and a multi-layer package substrate including: a first horizontal metal layer (120, paragraph [0033]) to provide a ground connection; a second horizontal metal layer (140, paragraph [0036]) above the first horizontal metal layer; vertical members (451/452, paragraph [0049]) coupling to the first and second horizontal metal layers; and a mold compound (130, paragraph [00354]) covering the first and second horizontal metal layers and the vertical members, wherein the first horizontal metal layer, the second horizontal metal layer, and the vertical members together form a structure including a conductive strip (115, paragraph [0033]) coupled to the conductive member, a transition member (a portion of 150r near 151) coupled to the conductive strip, a waveguide (an intermediate portion of 150r) coupled to the transition member, and a horn antenna coupled to the waveguide (remaining portion of 150r). Yen appears not to explicitly disclose that the conductive strip, the conductive member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna are arranged along a common axis. The art however well recognized a conductive strip, a conductive member, a waveguide, and a horn antenna being arranged along a common axis to be suitable for use as a semiconductor package layout. See, for example, Hsu, FIGs. 1A-1B; z-axis, conductive strip (conductor connected to 15 in FIG. 1B), a conductive member (15), waveguide (portion of 11/12 near W0), horn antenna (remaining portion of 11/12). According to well-established patent law precedents (see, for example, M.P.E.P. § 2144.07), therefore, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to have formed the conductive strip, the conductive member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna such that they are arranged along a common axis for its recognized suitability as a semiconductor package layout. Regarding claim 2, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the transition member has a flared shape that has a first end and a second end narrower than the first end, the second end coupled to the conductive strip and the first end coupled to the waveguide. Regarding claim 3, the combination of Yen and Hsu appears not to explicitly disclose that the conductive strip, the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna are impedance matched. However, the art well recognized that impedance matching of components of an RF system is desirable at least to maximize power transfer from source to load and/or to minimize reflections. To maximize power transfer from source to load and/or to minimize reflections it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to form the conductive strip, the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna such that they are impedance matched. Regarding claim 4, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the vertical members include first and second monolithic vertical members (each of 451 and 452 is a single piece) that form parts of the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna. Regarding claim 6, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses that the waveguide is a rectangular prism. Regarding claim 7, in FIGs. 1A-1C and 4A, Yen discloses the horn antenna including a trapezoidal shape in a top cross-sectional view of the semiconductor package. Regarding claim 21, in FIGs. 1A-1C, 4A, and 4B, Yen discloses that a distal end of the horn antenna includes an orifice (150a, paragraph [0037]). Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yen (US Pub. 2014/0239465). Regarding claim 10, Yen appears not to explicitly disclose that the conductive strip, the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna are impedance matched. However, the art well recognized that impedance matching of components of an RF system is desirable at least to maximize power transfer from source to load and/or to minimize reflections. To maximize power transfer from source to load and/or to minimize reflections it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to form the conductive strip, the transition member, the waveguide, and the horn antenna such that they are impedance matched. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yen (US Pub. 2014/0239465) in view of Yamamoto (US Pub. No. 2001/0008775). Regarding claim 27, Yen appears not to explicitly disclose the semiconductor package is a quad flat no lead (QFN) package. However, Yamamoto discloses that a QFN package has an advantage of reduced real state since the lead is inside the package when viewed from above (paragraph [0005]). To reduce the real estate required by the semiconductor package it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to from the Yen disclosed semiconductor package as a QFN package. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/7/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant contends that the various amendments are not disclosed by the cited references. This argument is not persuasive. Please see the claim rejections above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUCKER J WRIGHT whose telephone number is (571)270-3234. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Landau can be reached at 571-272-1731. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUCKER J WRIGHT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2891
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2022
Application Filed
May 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604718
MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604544
SOLID-STATE IMAGING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598756
PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL (PCM) SWITCH HAVING LOW HEATER RESISTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588565
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING BONDING PADS AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585158
DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING AN OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR TRANSISTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 908 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month