Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/979,849

SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATE AND ELECTRICAL INSPECTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 03, 2022
Examiner
LIU, XIAOMING
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
495 granted / 576 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
61.5%
+21.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 576 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-15 in the reply filed on 7/16/2025 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/3/2025. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. US 2019/0116672 in view of Hampp et al. US 2012/0013011 and Duckworth et al. US 2013/0069680. Re claim 1, Zhao teaches a semiconductor substrate (fig3) comprising: an internal circuit (signal lines in the display panel connected with 11, fig3, [42]); a plurality of first pads (11, fig3, [42]) electrically connected to the internal circuit; and one or a plurality of second pads (121 or 15, fig3, [77]) are not electrically connected to the internal circuit. Zhao does not explicitly show one or a plurality of second pads that have a surface hardness lower than that of the plurality of first pads. Hampp teaches forming bonding pad (120, fig6, [32]) coated with a metal layer (170, fig6, [34]) next to a test pad (130, fig6, [32]). Duckworth teaches contact pads with Ir or hard gold coating to achieve abrasion-resistance ([118]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Zhao, Hampp and Duckworth to form Ir or hard gold coating over the contact pads using the method of Hampp fig1-6 (hard gold / Ir hardness greater than Al or Cu, see teaching reference Cookson et al. US 2021/0346551 table 2). The motivation to do so is to improve yield by detect binding connection state (Zhao, [107]), reduced chance of failure of electrical continuity related to contamination formed during the process (Hampp, [23]) and achieve abrasion-resistance for the contact pads (Duckworth, [118]). Re claim 2, Zhao teaches a semiconductor substrate (10, fig3, [44]) electrically connected to an external substrate (flexible printed circuit in fig1, [35]), the semiconductor substrate comprising: an internal circuit (signal lines in the display panel connected with 11, fig3, [42]) that is a circuit to which a signal is input from the external substrate or a circuit that outputs a signal to the external substrate (flexible printed circuit in fig1, [35]); a plurality of first pads (11, fig3, [42]) electrically connecting the internal circuit to the external substrate; and one or a plurality of second pads (121, fig3, [77]) do not electrically connect the internal circuit to the external substrate. Zhao does not explicitly show one or a plurality of second pads have a surface hardness lower than that of the plurality of first pads. Hampp teaches forming bonding pad (120, fig6, [32]) coated with a metal layer (170, fig6, [34]) next to a test pad (130, fig6, [32]). Duckworth teaches contact pads with Ir or hard gold coating to achieve abrasion-resistance ([118]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Zhao, Hampp and Duckworth to form Ir or hard gold coating over the contact pads using the method of Hampp fig1-6 (hard gold / Ir hardness greater than Al or Cu, see teaching reference Cookson et al. US 2021/0346551 table 2). The motivation to do so is to improve yield by detect binding connection state (Zhao, [107]), reduced chance of failure of electrical continuity related to contamination formed during the process (Hampp, [23]) and achieve abrasion-resistance for the contact pads (Duckworth, [118]). Re claim 3, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein at least some of the plurality of first pads form a one-dimensional array together with at least one of the one or plurality of second pads (Zhao, fig3). Re claim 4, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the one or plurality of second pads is disposed at an end portion of the one-dimensional array (Zhao, 121, fig3, [77]). Re claim 5, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 3, wherein the semiconductor substrate includes the plurality of second pads (Zhao, 121, fig3, [77]), and any of the plurality of second pads is disposed at each of both end portions of the one-dimensional array (Zhao, fig3). Re claim 6, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the one or plurality of second pads is disposed between two of the plurality of first pads (Zhao, 121 between 11, fig3, [77]). Re claim 7, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 3, wherein, in the one- dimensional array, an interval between the second pad (Zhao, 121, fig3, [77]) and the first pad (Zhao, 11, fig3, [42]) that are adjacent to each other are narrower than twice an interval between two first pads that are adjacent to each other (Zhao, fig3). Re claim 8, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 7, wherein, in the one- dimensional array, the interval between the two first pads (Zhao, 11, fig3, [42]) that are adjacent to each other and the interval between the second pad (Zhao, 121, fig3, [77]) and the first pad (Zhao, 11, fig3, [42]) that are adjacent to each other are substantially equal (Zhao, fig3). Re claim 9, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein the one or plurality of second pads (Zhao, 121, fig3 or 4, [77]) are not connected to any passive element or active element. Re claim 10, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein a number of the first pads (Zhao, 11, fig3, [42]) is greater than a number of the one or plurality of second pads (Zhao, 121, fig3, [77]). Re claim 11, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor substrate (Zhao, 10, fig3, [44]) includes the plurality of second pads (Zhao, set of two 121 located on one side and overlap with U shaped 141 in fig1 or H shaped 141 in fig2, fig1-3), and any two of the plurality of second pads are electrically connected to each other by wiring (Zhao, two 121 shorted by 141 in fig1 or 2). Re claim 12, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein a size of each of the one or plurality of second pads (Zhao, 15, fig3, [77]) is smaller than a size of each of the plurality of first pads (Zhao, 11, fig3, [42]). Re claim 13, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of first pads is made of tantalum, iridium (Zhao 11 coated with Ir, fig3, [42]), or an iridium alloy, and each of the one or plurality of second pads is made of aluminum (Zhao 121 made of Al as test pad 130 in Hampp fig6) or an alloy of aluminum and copper. Re claim 15, Zhao modified above teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, wherein, in a state in which the semiconductor substrate is electrically connected to an external substrate (Zhao, 10 in fig3 bonded with FPC in fig1), surfaces of the plurality of first pads are further plated with gold (Duckworth, hard gold used as noble metal coating to improve abrasion-resistant, [118]), and surfaces of the one or plurality of second pads are not plated with gold (Hampp, capping layer 150/250 removed with contamination 280 with test pads 130 exposed, fig6 and 8, [37, 58]). Claim(s) 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bang et al. US 2009/0309477 in view of Zhao et al. US 2019/0116672, Hampp et al. US 2012/0013011 and Duckworth et al. US 2013/0069680. Re claim 14, Bang teaches the semiconductor substrate according to claim 1, further comprising a pixel region (P1, fig2, [31]) in which pixels are arranged two-dimensionally, wherein the plurality of first pads (130, fig2, [31]) are disposed to surround the pixel region. Bang does not explicitly show one or a plurality of second pads that have a surface hardness lower than that of the plurality of first pads are not electrically connected to the internal circuit. Zhao teaches a semiconductor substrate (fig3) comprising: an internal circuit (signal lines in the display panel connected with 11, fig3, [42]); a plurality of first pads (11, fig3, [42]) electrically connected to the internal circuit; and one or a plurality of second pads (121 or 15, fig3, [77]) are not electrically connected to the internal circuit. Hampp teaches forming bonding pad (120, fig6, [32]) coated with a metal layer (170, fig6, [34]) next to a test pad (130, fig6, [32]). Duckworth teaches contact pads with Ir or hard gold coating to achieve abrasion-resistance ([118]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Bang, Zhao, Hampp and Duckworth to add in a test pad with an Ir or hard gold coating over the contact pads using the method of Hampp fig1-6 (hard gold / Ir hardness greater than Al or Cu, see teaching reference Cookson et al. US 2021/0346551 table 2). The motivation to do so is to improve yield by detect binding connection state (Zhao, [107]), reduced chance of failure of electrical continuity related to contamination formed during the process (Hampp, [23]) and achieve abrasion-resistance for the contact pads (Duckworth, [118]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XIAOMING LIU whose telephone number is (571)270-0384. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-8pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S Kim can be reached at (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XIAOMING LIU/Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604495
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH MULTI-THRESHOLD GATE STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604467
SEMICONDUCTOR WITH EXTENDED LIFE TIME FLASH MEMORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588442
METHOD FOR FABRICATING MULTIPLE WORK FUNCTION LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575145
MONOLITHIC STACKED FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR (SFET) WITH DUAL MIDDLE DIELECTRIC ISOLATION (MDI) SEPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563813
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 576 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month