Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/987,334

STAGE AND CURING DEVICE HAVING THE SAME

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Nov 15, 2022
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
282 granted / 437 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
The arguments and amendments submitted 11/14/2025 have been considered. In light of amendments made, all prior claim objections and USC § 112(b) rejections are hereby withdrawn. The merits of the claims are discussed below. Election/Restrictions Claims 1 and 15 are allowable. Claims 6-8 and 18-19, previously withdrawn from consideration as a result of a restriction requirement, require all the limitations of an allowable claim. Pursuant to the procedures set forth in MPEP § 821.04(a), the restriction requirement between stage species A and B, as set forth in the Office action mailed on 04/24/2025, is hereby withdrawn and claims 6-8 and 18-19 are hereby rejoined and fully examined for patentability under 37 CFR 1.104. In view of the withdrawal of the restriction requirement, applicant(s) are advised that if any claim presented in a divisional application is anticipated by, or includes all the limitations of, a claim that is allowable in the present application, such claim may be subject to provisional statutory and/or nonstatutory double patenting rejections over the claims of the instant application. Once the restriction requirement is withdrawn, the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 121 are no longer applicable. See In re Ziegler, 443 F.2d 1211, 1215, 170 USPQ 129, 131-32 (CCPA 1971). See also MPEP § 804.01. Claim Objections The following claim(s) are objected to because of these informalities: In claim 4, line 2, “an upper surface” should read “the upper surface”. In claim 6, lines 2-3, “a plurality of first blocks and a plurality of second blocks, each having a shape” should read “a plurality of first blocks and a plurality of second blocks, each of the plurality of second blocks having a shape”. In claim 10, line 2, “an upper surface” should read “the upper surface”. In claim 12, line 4, “an upper surface” should read “the upper surface”. In claim 16, line 2, “an upper surface” should read “the upper surface”. In claim 18, lines 2-3, “a plurality of first blocks and a plurality of second blocks, each having a shape” should read “a plurality of first blocks and a plurality of second blocks, each of the plurality of second blocks having a shape”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 6-8 and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claims 6 and 18 each recite "one side surface of the plurality of first blocks is provided with a groove defined therein". It is unclear whether each of the plurality of first blocks has a side surface with a groove define therein, or instead one side surface of one of the plurality of first blocks is provided with a groove defined therein. Dependent claims fall herewith. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5, 9, 11, 13-15, 17, and 20 are allowed in view of the present amendments and for the reasons described in sections 9-12 of the previous office action. Claims 4, 10, 12, and 16 would be allowable with appropriate corrections for the objections listed above. Claims 6 and 18 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action, and with appropriate corrections for the objections listed above. Claims 7-8 and 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph for the respective base claims, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JRS/ Examiner Art Unit 1745 /PHILIP C TUCKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Nov 14, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600091
OPTICAL SHAPING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598895
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570043
POWDER BED FUSION RECOATER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570359
VEHICLE PILLAR REINFORCEMENT USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564987
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CURING FORMABLE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month