Office Action Predictor
Application No. 17/988,038

DIODE CONFIGURATION FOR CIRCUIT PROTECTION

Final Rejection §102§Other
Filed
Nov 16, 2022
Examiner
DINH, TUAN T
Art Unit
2848
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Skyworks Solutions, INC.
OA Round
4 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

79%
Career Allow Rate
916 granted / 1165 resolved
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
avg trend
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 pending
1205
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Note: A p–n junction (or NP junction) is the fundamental interface or boundary between two types of semiconductor materials: p-type (positive, filled with holes) and n-type (negative, filled with electrons). It is the basic building block of most modern electronic devices, including diodes, transistors, and solar cells. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Voldman (U.S. 2009/0020818), hereafter Voldman. As to claim 1, Voldman discloses a semiconductor device (100) for shunting current in a circuit protection configuration, para-0002+, the device (100) as shown in figure 1 comprising: a first heavily doped semiconductor region (126, para-0017) having an anode electrical contact and a first doping polarity; a second heavily doped semiconductor region (129, para-0017) having a cathode electrical contact and a second doping polarity opposite to the first doping polarity, para-0003+; a third semiconductor region (122) extending between the first and second heavily doped semiconductor regions (126, 129), the second doped semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region forming a PN junction, see figure 1G; and a gate (140, para-0014) coupled to the third semiconductor region (122), the gate (140) controllable between a first mode in which additional space charges are induced in the third semiconductor region (122) to deplete the third semiconductor region, and a second mode in which additional space charges are not induced in the third semiconductor region. As to claim 2, Voldman discloses the gate is a gate electrode (140) adjacent to the third semiconductor region (122) and the gate electrode (140) is configured in the first mode to generate an electric field to exert a potential change in the third semiconductor region. As to claim 3, Voldman discloses the gate electrode forms a p-varactor (reverse biased PN junction) with the adjacent third semiconductor region, para-0022+. As to claim 4, Voldman discloses the gate electrode (140) is formed from a heavily doped polysilicon layer (para-0014+) adjacent to an oxide insulator layer. As to claim 5, Voldman discloses the gate is a fourth semiconductor region (128) embedded in the third semiconductor region (122) and form a PN junction with the third semiconductor regions, the fourth semiconductor region (128) configured to induce additional space charges in the third semiconductor region (122) when a bias voltage is applied to the fourth semiconductor region. As to claim 6, Voldman discloses herein a depth of the third semiconductor region (122, figure 1G) is larger than a depth of the fourth semiconductor region (128). As to claim 7, Voldman discloses the fourth semiconductor region (128) is a heavily doped N+ region (para-0013+) and the third semiconductor region (122) is a p- type semiconductor region. As to claim 8, Voldman discloses the first heavily doped semiconductor region (126) is a P+ region, the second heavily doped semiconductor region (129) is an N+ region, and the third semiconductor region (122) is a p-type semiconductor region. As to claim 9, Voldman further comprising a central P+ semiconductor region (524, para-0047) that divides the third semiconductor region into two semiconductor regions. As to claim 10, Voldman discloses the semiconductor device (100) is fabricated as a silicon-on-insulator device. As to claim 11, Voldman discloses the PN junction is configured to be forward biased, para-0022+. As to claim 12, Voldman discloses the second mode is a surge event mode during which the voltage received at the anode electrical contact is greater than a threshold voltage, and the first mode is a normal operation mode during which the voltage received at the anode electrical contact is less than the threshold voltage, para- 0019+. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-20 are allowed. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Neither the references cited nor the cited references teach, suggest, or in combination of a circuit for shunting current in a circuit protection configuration having a coupling circuit configured to couple a second voltage level to the gate when a voltage of the first voltage source is below a threshold voltage, and configured to pull the gate down to a ground voltage when the voltage of the first voltage source is above the threshold voltage. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled "Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance." Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant's arguments filed 10/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: Voldman does not describe or suggest, "A semiconductor device…comprising: a first heavily doped semiconductor region having an anode electrical contact and a first doping polarity; a second heavily doped semiconductor region having a cathode electrical contact and a second doping polarity opposite to the first doping polarity;" and "a third semiconductor region extending between the first heavily doped semiconductor region and the second heavily doped semiconductor region, the second heavily doped semiconductor region and the third semiconductor region forming a PN junction," as is recited in currently amended independent claim 1, see in Remark, pages 1-2. After carefully review, examiner respectively disagrees. As shown in figure 1G, Voldman clearly discloses the first heavily doped semiconductor region (P+,126, para-0017), the second heavily doped semiconductor region (N+, 129, para-0017), and the third semiconductor region (P+, 122) formed in between the first and second heavily doped semiconductor region (126, 129), the structure is formed as the same as in the instant application as shown in figures 6A-6B, in the formed PN or NP junction. As in figure 9, Voldman clearly discloses in para-0047 that the central P+ (524) semiconductor region that divides the third semiconductor region into two semiconductor regions," as recited in claim 9. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN T DINH whose telephone number is (571)272-1929. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 8AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN T DINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 16, 2022
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Dec 11, 2024
Response Filed
Mar 31, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §Other
May 20, 2025
Interview Requested
May 28, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 29, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Oct 10, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §Other
Apr 02, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12598704
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING POWER MODULE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581591
POWER REGULATOR INTERFACES FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581599
PACKAGING MODULE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581743
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571469
CONTROL MODULE OF A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1165 resolved cases by this examiner