Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/990,514

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A REMOTEBUILD STORAGE VOLUME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2022
Examiner
KIM, SISLEY NAHYUN
Art Unit
2196
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Stripe, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
590 granted / 665 resolved
+33.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
707
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 665 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless - (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chitalwala et al. (US 2023/0043579, hereinafter Chitalwala). Regarding claim 1, Chitalwala discloses A system comprising: a virtual machine (VM) configured to (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines): mount a snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0050]: system 300 requires only one initial mounting of a given hardware snapshot volume (on storage array A at 471) to a corresponding build-node (on friendly build machine computing device S) when the working copy of the software base is first propagated to system 300), the snapshot storage volume storing a set of build dependencies (paragraph [0036]: FIG. 3 depicts some salient portions of a system 300 for efficient propagation of a software base and for enabling more efficient informal/friendly software builds; paragraph [0041]: a snapshot may be thought of as an instant image of data at a given point in time (e.g., a volume such as a volume comprising official software base 352)); execute a software build workflow (paragraph [0061]: At block 472, the respective build-node on computing device S, illustratively build-node BNn, is available for use to generate a friendly build; paragraph [0063]: build-node BNn incorporates friendly changes into the software base, as received from block 484 on computing device DD) using the set of build dependencies stored within the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0036]: FIG. 3 depicts some salient portions of a system 300 for efficient propagation of a software base and for enabling more efficient informal/friendly software builds; paragraph [0041]: a snapshot may be thought of as an instant image of data at a given point in time (e.g., a volume such as a volume comprising official software base 352)); and produce an software build action result of the software build workflow (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block). Regarding claim 2, Chitalwala discloses wherein the set of build dependencies comprises one or more of a compiler, a software library, a minifier, and a bundler (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art). Regarding claim 3, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result comprises one of compiled object code, bundled interpreted code, and code test results (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art). Regarding claim 4, Chitalwala discloses further comprising: a host computing device configured to execute the virtual machine (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines), wherein the snapshot storage volume is stored on (paragraph [0040]: Element 360: Storage array A (360) is a storage device and/or system comprising a collection of storage media (preferably high availability disks) that are commonly accessible via a body of software, firmware, and/or hardware that controls and manages the collection; furthermore, according to the illustrative embodiment, storage array A is equipped with so-called hardware snapshot technology) a local physical drive connected to the host computing device (paragraph [0036]: System 300 comprises: storage array A (element 360) and computing device S (element 370), which are communicatively coupled to each other as well as to computing device CC (element 350) and computing device(s) DD (elements 380) as shown … The depicted elements are communicatively coupled as shown, i.e., they communicate electronically with each other via at least a respective wired or wireless communication link according to the illustrative embodiment; they may be in direct electronic communication, e.g., via dedicated lines, or may be indirectly connected, e.g., via public and/or private telecommunications network(s) such as a local area network, a private intranet and/or the Internet, without limitation). Regarding claim 5, Chitalwala discloses further comprising: a host computing device configured to execute the virtual machine (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines), wherein the snapshot storage volume is stored on (paragraph [0040]: Element 360: Storage array A (360) is a storage device and/or system comprising a collection of storage media (preferably high availability disks) that are commonly accessible via a body of software, firmware, and/or hardware that controls and manages the collection; furthermore, according to the illustrative embodiment, storage array A is equipped with so-called hardware snapshot technology) a remote virtual drive configured to be accessed over a network by the host computing device (paragraph [0036]: System 300 comprises: storage array A (element 360) and computing device S (element 370), which are communicatively coupled to each other as well as to computing device CC (element 350) and computing device(s) DD (elements 380) as shown … The depicted elements are communicatively coupled as shown, i.e., they communicate electronically with each other via at least a respective wired or wireless communication link according to the illustrative embodiment; they may be in direct electronic communication, e.g., via dedicated lines, or may be indirectly connected, e.g., via public and/or private telecommunications network(s) such as a local area network, a private intranet and/or the Internet, without limitation). Regarding claim 6, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result is written to the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0064]: At block 478, build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art. Thus, the friendly executable or friendly build is designated to have the second version number, corresponding to the second version of the software base, e.g., version 1.0.1. The friendly executable now comprises the friendly changes in executable form, e.g., working diagnostics, working features, etc.). Regarding claim 7, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result is written to a modification layer of the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0044]: the component implementing the snapshot management software layer (e.g., the given build-node on computing device S) may derive a set of pointers and/or data that represents the snapshot.; paragraph [0064]: At block 478, build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art. Thus, the friendly executable or friendly build is designated to have the second version number, corresponding to the second version of the software base, e.g., version 1.0.1. The friendly executable now comprises the friendly changes in executable form, e.g., working diagnostics, working features, etc.). Regarding claim 8, Chitalwala discloses A method comprising: receiving, by a build server, a software build workflow comprising a software build action (paragraph [0036]: System 300 comprises: storage array A (element 360) and computing device S (element 370), which are communicatively coupled to each other as well as to computing device CC (element 350) and computing device(s) DD (elements 380) as shown … The depicted elements are communicatively coupled as shown, i.e., they communicate electronically with each other via at least a respective wired or wireless communication link according to the illustrative embodiment; they may be in direct electronic communication, e.g., via dedicated lines; paragraph [0059]: At block 462, storage array A receives the transfer of the software base, i.e., a first version of the software base that is illustratively designated version 1.0.0; paragraph [0060]: Computing device S is illustratively configured with a plurality of build-nodes BN1-BNn, each build-node comprising at least one processor-core on computing device S); booting, by the build server, a virtual machine (VM) (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines): mounting, by the VM, a snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0050]: system 300 requires only one initial mounting of a given hardware snapshot volume (on storage array A at 471) to a corresponding build-node (on friendly build machine computing device S) when the working copy of the software base is first propagated to system 300) storing a set of build dependencies (paragraph [0036]: FIG. 3 depicts some salient portions of a system 300 for efficient propagation of a software base and for enabling more efficient informal/friendly software builds; paragraph [0041]: a snapshot may be thought of as an instant image of data at a given point in time (e.g., a volume such as a volume comprising official software base 352)); executing, by the VM, a software build workflow (paragraph [0061]: At block 472, the respective build-node on computing device S, illustratively build-node BNn, is available for use to generate a friendly build; paragraph [0063]: build-node BNn incorporates friendly changes into the software base, as received from block 484 on computing device DD) using the set of build dependencies stored within the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0036]: FIG. 3 depicts some salient portions of a system 300 for efficient propagation of a software base and for enabling more efficient informal/friendly software builds; paragraph [0041]: a snapshot may be thought of as an instant image of data at a given point in time (e.g., a volume such as a volume comprising official software base 352)); and producing a software build action result of the software build action (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block); and returning the software build action result as an output of the software build workflow (paragraph [0064]: Once the friendly executable has been built, computing device S transmits it electronically to computing device DD, where it is received at block 486). Regarding claim 15 referring to claim 8, Chitalwala discloses A system comprising: at least one processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium, operatively coupled to the at least one processor, the non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to perform a method comprising: … (paragraphs [0088] and [0096]). Regarding claims 9 and 16, Chitalwala discloses wherein the set of build dependencies comprises one or more of a compiler, a software library, a minifier, and a bundler (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art). Regarding claims 10 and 17, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result comprises one of compiled object code, bundled interpreted code, and code test results (paragraph [0064]: build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art). Regarding claims 11 and 18, Chitalwala discloses wherein the snapshot storage volume is stored on (paragraph [0040]: Element 360: Storage array A (360) is a storage device and/or system comprising a collection of storage media (preferably high availability disks) that are commonly accessible via a body of software, firmware, and/or hardware that controls and manages the collection; furthermore, according to the illustrative embodiment, storage array A is equipped with so-called hardware snapshot technology) a local physical drive connected to the host computing device (paragraph [0036]: System 300 comprises: storage array A (element 360) and computing device S (element 370), which are communicatively coupled to each other as well as to computing device CC (element 350) and computing device(s) DD (elements 380) as shown … The depicted elements are communicatively coupled as shown, i.e., they communicate electronically with each other via at least a respective wired or wireless communication link according to the illustrative embodiment; they may be in direct electronic communication, e.g., via dedicated lines, or may be indirectly connected, e.g., via public and/or private telecommunications network(s) such as a local area network, a private intranet and/or the Internet, without limitation), the host computing device configured to execute the virtual machine (VM) (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines), . Regarding claims 12 and 19, Chitalwala discloses wherein the snapshot storage volume is stored on (paragraph [0040]: Element 360: Storage array A (360) is a storage device and/or system comprising a collection of storage media (preferably high availability disks) that are commonly accessible via a body of software, firmware, and/or hardware that controls and manages the collection; furthermore, according to the illustrative embodiment, storage array A is equipped with so-called hardware snapshot technology) a remote virtual drive configured to be accessed over a network by a host computing device (paragraph [0036]: System 300 comprises: storage array A (element 360) and computing device S (element 370), which are communicatively coupled to each other as well as to computing device CC (element 350) and computing device(s) DD (elements 380) as shown … The depicted elements are communicatively coupled as shown, i.e., they communicate electronically with each other via at least a respective wired or wireless communication link according to the illustrative embodiment; they may be in direct electronic communication, e.g., via dedicated lines, or may be indirectly connected, e.g., via public and/or private telecommunications network(s) such as a local area network, a private intranet and/or the Internet, without limitation), the host computing device configured to execute the virtual machine (VM) (paragraph [0094]: Various components of the illustrated systems can be implemented in one or more virtual machines), . Regarding claims 13 and 20, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result is written to the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0064]: At block 478, build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art. Thus, the friendly executable or friendly build is designated to have the second version number, corresponding to the second version of the software base, e.g., version 1.0.1. The friendly executable now comprises the friendly changes in executable form, e.g., working diagnostics, working features, etc.). Regarding claim 14, Chitalwala discloses wherein the software build action result is written to a modification layer of the snapshot storage volume (paragraph [0044]: the component implementing the snapshot management software layer (e.g., the given build-node on computing device S) may derive a set of pointers and/or data that represents the snapshot.; paragraph [0064]: At block 478, build-node BNn on computing device S compiles (or builds) a "friendly executable" that is based on the second version of the software base from the preceding block. Compilers and build tools for this operation are well known in the art. Thus, the friendly executable or friendly build is designated to have the second version number, corresponding to the second version of the software base, e.g., version 1.0.1. The friendly executable now comprises the friendly changes Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SISLEY N. KIM whose telephone number is (571)270-7832. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11:30AM -7:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, April Y. Blair can be reached on (571)270-1014. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SISLEY N KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2196 05/05/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2022
Application Filed
May 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 13, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 28, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 28, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 31, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602254
JOB NEGOTIATION FOR WORKFLOW AUTOMATION TASKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602260
COMPUTER-BASED PROVISIONING OF CLOUD RESOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591474
BATCH SCHEDULING FUNCTION CALLS OF A TRANSACTIONAL APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE (API) PROTOCOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585507
LOAD TESTING AND PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS USING A CLOUD COMPUTING PLATFORM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578994
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSITIONING COMPUTING DEVICES BETWEEN OPERATING STATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 665 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month