Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 17/991,179

COIL COMPONENT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 21, 2022
Priority
Jan 12, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0004549
Examiner
CHAN, TSZFUNG JACKIE
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
671 granted / 888 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 888 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/06/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-10, and 17-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “wherein the first and second lead-out portions include an anchor portion protruding further toward the third and fourth surfaces of the body” is indefinite and unclear. The current claim limitation appears to state that an anchor portion of the first lead-out portion is protruding further toward both the third and fourth surfaces of the body and an anchor portion of the second lead-out portion is protruding further toward both the third and fourth surfaces of the body. Based on the support, the claim limitation should state “the first lead-out portion include an anchor portion protruding further toward the third surface of the body” and “the second lead-out portion include an anchor portion protruding further toward the fourth surface of the body”. Claim 17 recites “wherein each of the first and second lead-out portions includes an anchor portion protruding further toward a corresponding one of the third and fourth surfaces of the body” is indefinite and unclear. Based on the support, the claim limitation should state “the first lead-out portion include an anchor portion protruding further toward the third surface of the body” and “the second lead-out portion include an anchor portion protruding further toward the fourth surface of the body”. Claim 17, line 19 and line 23, recites “a portion” which is indefinite and unclear whether the term “a portion” is the same in lines 19 and 23. The examiner suggests clarification. As best understood, line 23 should recite “the portion”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 17-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Li et al. [U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0357565]. Regarding Claim 17, Li et al. shows a coil component (Figs. 1-2 and Drawings A-D below) comprising: a body (50) having first (103) and second (104) surfaces opposing each other in a first direction (Z-direction), and third (101) and fourth (102) surfaces connecting the first and second surfaces to each other (see Figs. 1-2) and opposing each other in a second direction (X-direction); a substrate (element 23 including elements 24, 231, 232, Paragraph [0037]) disposed in the body (see Figs. 1-2); a coil unit (42, 44) disposed on the substrate (see Figs. 1-2), and including a coil pattern (42, 44), first and second lead-out portions (lead-out portion L which represents elements 62, 64, see Drawing A below) connected to the coil pattern (see Figs. 1-2 and Drawing A below) and extending to the first surface (103) of the body (see Figs. 1-2 and Drawing A below), and first and second sub lead-out portions (sub lead-out portion S which represents partial elements 63, 65, see Drawing A below) corresponding to the first and second lead-out portions (element 63 corresponding to element 62 and element 64 corresponding to element 65) and spaced apart from the coil pattern (see Figs. 1-2 and Drawing A below), the first and second lead-out portions and the first and second sub lead-out portions opposing each other, respectively, with respect to the substrate (see Figs. 1-2 and Drawing A below, lead-out portion L which represents element 62 and sub lead-out portion S which represents partial element 63 opposing each other with respect to element 23; lead-out portion L which represents element 64 and sub lead-out portion S which represents partial element 65 opposing each other with respect to element 23); and external electrodes (851, 852) disposed on the first surface (103) of the body (see Figs. 1-2) and connected to the lead-out portions, respectively (see Figs. 1-2), wherein a maximum size of each of the first and second lead-out portions in the second direction is greater than a maximum size of each of the first and second sub lead-out portions in the second direction (see Fig. 2 and Drawing A below, wherein a maximum size of the lead-out portion L which represents elements 62, 64 is greater than a maximum size of the sub lead-out portion S which represents partial elements 63, 65 in the X-direction), wherein each of the first and second lead-out portions (lead-out portion L which represents elements 62, 64, see Drawing A below) includes an anchor portion (anchor portion AP which represents elements 62, 64, see Drawing C or Drawing D below) protruding further toward a corresponding one of the third and fourth surfaces of the body than a portion of the respective lead-out portion contacting the first surface of the body, respectively (anchor portion AP of element 62 protrudes further toward a corresponding element 101 than a portion P of the element 62 contacting the element 103 and anchor portion AP of element 64 protrudes further toward a corresponding element 102 than a portion P of the element 64 contacting the element 103, see Drawing A below, see also Drawing C or Drawing D below), and wherein the anchor portion of the first and second lead-out portions protrudes further in a direction from the first surface toward the second surface of the body than a portion of the respective lead-out portion contacting the first surface of the body (topmost portion of anchor portion AP of element 62 protrude further in a direction from element 103 toward element 104 than a portion P of the respective element 62 contacting element 103 and topmost portion of anchor portion AP of element 64 protrude further in a direction from element 103 toward element 104 than a portion P of the respective element 64 contacting element 103, see Drawing A below, see also Drawing C or Drawing D below), wherein sub vias (111, 113) penetrating through the substrate (element 23 including elements 24, 231, 232, Paragraph [0037]) each connect a respective one of the first and second lead-out portions to a corresponding one of the first and second sub lead-out portions (see Drawing A below, see also Drawing C or Drawing D below, element 111 penetrating through element 231 of element 23 connect element 62 to a corresponding element 63 and element 113 penetrating through element 232 of element 23 connect element 64 to a corresponding element 65, Paragraph [0066]). Regarding Claim 18, Li et al. shows each of the sub lead-out portions occupies a smaller volume within the body than each of the lead-out portions (see Figs. 1-2 and Drawing A below, sub lead-out portion S which represents partial elements 63, 65 occupies a smaller volume within element 50 than lead-out portion L which represents elements 62, 64). Regarding Claim 19, Li et al. shows (see Fig. 2 and see Drawings A-B below) each of the lead-out portions (lead-out portion L which represents elements 62, 64, see Drawing A below) includes a first region (region R1, see Drawing B below) and a second region (region R2), the second region having a smaller size in the second direction and being closer to the first surface of the body than the first region (see Fig. 2 and Drawings A-B below, region R2 have a smaller size in the X-direction and being closer to element 103 than region R1). PNG media_image1.png 627 696 media_image1.png Greyscale Drawing A PNG media_image2.png 474 572 media_image2.png Greyscale Drawing B PNG media_image3.png 572 676 media_image3.png Greyscale Drawing C PNG media_image4.png 744 865 media_image4.png Greyscale Drawing D PNG media_image5.png 571 693 media_image5.png Greyscale Drawing 1 PNG media_image6.png 565 676 media_image6.png Greyscale Drawing 2 PNG media_image7.png 570 658 media_image7.png Greyscale Drawing 3 PNG media_image8.png 334 521 media_image8.png Greyscale Drawing 4 PNG media_image9.png 492 629 media_image9.png Greyscale Drawing 5 PNG media_image10.png 491 664 media_image10.png Greyscale Drawing I Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-10, and 16 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 07/06/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant’s arguments that Li et al. does not show “wherein sub vias penetrating through the substrate each connect a respective one of the first and second lead-out portions to a corresponding one of the first and second sub lead-out portions” is found not persuasive. Li et al. shows sub vias (111, 113) penetrating through the substrate (element 23 including elements 24, 231, 232, Paragraph [0037]) each connect a respective one of the first and second lead-out portions to a corresponding one of the first and second sub lead-out portions (see Drawing A below, see also Drawing C or Drawing D below, element 111 penetrating through element 231 of element 23 connect element 62 to a corresponding element 63 and element 113 penetrating through element 232 of element 23 connect element 64 to a corresponding element 65, Paragraph [0066]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TSZFUNG J CHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7981. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 8:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached at (571)272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TSZFUNG J CHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §112
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Mar 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jul 06, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749616
ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER WITH AN INCREASED TOTAL LEAKAGE IMPEDANCE
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749611
COIL COMPONENT
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738410
TRANSFORMER DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739976
EMBEDDED INDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731717
SUBSTRATE EMBEDDED MAGNETIC CORE INDUCTORS AND METHOD OF MAKING
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+18.9%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 888 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month