Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/996,125

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION DETECTION DEVICE THAT INCLUDES AN ENCAPSULATING STRUCTURE, A CAVITY, A PERIPHERAL WALL MADE OF A MINERAL MATERIAL, AND REINFIRCING PILLARS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 13, 2022
Examiner
WINTERS, SEAN AYERS
Art Unit
2892
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
COMMISSARIAT À L'ÉNERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ÉNERGIES ALTERNATIVES
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
97 granted / 112 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
80 currently pending
Career history
192
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 112 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments 2. The Amendments filed September 30th, 2025 are noted. Applicant’s amendments to the Specification to overcome the objections set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 07/08/2025 are noted. Applicant’s amendment(s) to the Specification have overcome the objection(s) to the Title previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 07/08/2025, so the objection(s) to the Title has been withdrawn. Applicant’s amendments to the claims are noted. 3. Claims 1-15 remain pending in the application. 4. Claims 1-15 have been fully considered in examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claims 5-9 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5, line 4: being in contact with lower pillars (41, 50) extending from the readout substrate should read --- being in contact with lower pillars extending from the readout substrate --- Claims 6-9 are also objected to by virtue of their dependency on claim 5. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yon (U.S. PG Pub No US2017/0317137A1) (of record). Regarding claim 15, Yon teaches a device (10 comprising 11) fig. 2H [0079, 0006] for detecting electromagnetic radiation [0038], comprising: a readout substrate (2 comprising 20) fig. 2H [0049]; a matrix-array of thermal detectors (10’s comprising 11’s) fig. 2H [0002, 0049, 0072] (able to detect the electromagnetic radiation [0038, 0070]), resting on the readout substrate (2); an encapsulating structure (comprising 31) fig. 2E [0071], delimiting a cavity (cavity 3 laterally enclosed by 31) see modified fig. 2H below [0073, 0028] in which the matrix-array of thermal detectors (10 comprising 11) is located, and comprising: a peripheral wall (comprising outer sidewalls of 31 and walls of 4) fig. 2H [0073, 0050], made of a mineral material (alumina / Al2O3) [0050] laterally deliming the cavity (Cavity 3) [see modified fig. 2H below]; an encapsulating thin layer (34 material) fig. 2H [0079], comprising an upper portion (uppermost portion of 34) extending above the matrix array [0002, 0049] of thermal detectors (10 comprising 11) and resting on (supported by) the peripheral wall (comprising walls of 4), the peripheral wall has a lateral recess (gap in 4 caused by pillar 12) [0050, 0075] resulting in a vertical enlargement of the cavity (expanded open space in 3 caused by horizontal gap in 4), in a (horizontal) plane parallel to the readout substrate (2), this lateral recess (gap in 4 filled by 12) defining (including) an intermediate area (IA) [see modified fig. 2H below] of a (bordering a top) surface of the readout substrate (2) surrounding the matrix-array of thermal detectors (11 comprising 10); and the encapsulating thin layer (34) comprising reinforcing pillars (comprising RP1, RP2 and 12) see modified fig. 2H below [0075, 0079] arranged in the intermediate area (IA) (vertically) around the matrix-array of thermal detectors (10 comprising 11), separate from one another and extending (downward) from the upper portion (uppermost surface of 34) until resting on (supported by) the readout substrate (2). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Lateral recess in 4 )][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (Cavity 3)][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: textbox (IA)][AltContent: textbox (RP1)][AltContent: textbox (RP2)][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 200 387 media_image1.png Greyscale Modified fig. 2E, 2F, and 2H of Yon Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/30/2025 with respect to claim 15 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. With respect to Applicant’s argument(s) that “Additionally, Claims 1 and 15 similarly recite reinforcing pillars constituting part of the encapsulating thin layer, arranged in the intermediate area around the matrix-array of thermal detectors, separate from one another and extending from the upper portion until resting on the readout substrate… Applicant submits that the parts of the sealing layer 34 that seal the vents of the encapsulating layer ([0087] of Yon) do not rest on the substrate, as claimed.” --- attention is directed to the Merriam-Webster definition of the term rest: Rest: to sit or lie fixed or supported It is noted that this definition of “rest” merely requires for the readout substrate to support the reinforcing pillars, as is reflected in the 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection of record mailed 07/08/2025; the term rest does not require direct, physical contact between the two objects, as is reflected in the language of the Remarks filed 09/30/2025. Because the substrate 23 of Yon structurally supports all components placed thereon, including the reinforcing pillars (comprising RP1, RP2 and 12) – all components are considered to “rest on” the substrate 23 of Yon. In order to definitively overcome this reasonable interpretation of the term “rest on”, Applicant would need to explicitly claim ‘direct/physical contact’ between the reinforcing pillars and the substate. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 and 10-14 are allowed. Claims 5-9 contain allowable subject matter and would be allowable but for the objection in claim 5 noted above. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1 is allowed because the prior art of record neither anticipates nor renders obvious the claimed limitation(s) “partially removing the first mineral sacrificial layer and the second mineral sacrificial layer, by wet chemical etching in an acid medium, through the vents, so as to free the matrix-array of thermal detectors and to obtain the peripheral wall formed of a non-etched portion of the first and second mineral sacrificial layers” in the context of claim 1. Claims 2-14 are also allowed by virtue of their dependency on claim 1. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Remaining references made available on the PTO-892 form (of record) are considered relevant to the present disclosure because they all feature packages with thermal detectors. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEAN AYERS WINTERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3308. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 10:30 am - 7:00 pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, N. Drew Richards can be reached at (571) 272-1736. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEAN AYERS WINTERS/Examiner, Art Unit 2892 01/12/2026 /NORMAN D RICHARDS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2892
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 13, 2022
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 30, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604591
SPACER LED ARCHITECTURE FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY MICRO LED DISPLAYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598972
Methods Used In Forming A Memory Array Comprising Strings Of Memory Cells Including Insulator Walls in a Through-Array-Via Region
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593680
INTEGRATED ASSEMBLIES HAVING LINERS OR RINGS SURROUNDING REGIONS OF CONDUCTIVE POSTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588247
Spacer Structures for Nano-Sheet-Based Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588434
METHODS FOR FORMING DIELECTRIC MATERIALS WITH SELECTED POLARIZATION FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.7%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 112 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month