Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/002,638

Surface-Modified Electron Transport Layer of Organic Light-Emitting Diode

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2022
Priority
Jun 26, 2020 — provisional 63/044,560 +2 more
Examiner
IMTIAZ, S M SOHEL
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Loyola University Chicago
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
503 granted / 555 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
579
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 555 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to applicant’s Restriction/Election filed on 05/15/2026. Currently claims 1-28 are pending in the application. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-23, in the reply filed on 05/15/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 10/17/2023 and 06/16/2025 were filed before the mailing date of the office action. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements were considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 (b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 12, 14, 16 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112 (b), as being indefinite for failing to particularly pointing out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, regard as their invention. Regarding claims 12, 14 and 16, each claim recites “the metal atom” (claim 12, line 2; claim 14, line 2; claim 16, line 2). There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claim 12 depends from claim 11, claim 14 depends from claim 13, and claim 16 depends from claim 15, and each of claims 11, 13 and 15 depends from claim 1; none of claims 1, 11, 13 or 15 previously recites a “metal atom.” The “metal atom” is first introduced only in claim 9, from which claims 12, 14 and 16 do not depend. It is therefore unclear whether “the metal atom” is recalling the metal atom of claim 9 or introducing a new element, rendering the claims indefinite. Clarification and/or correction are/is required. For the purpose of examination, the claim will be interpreted according to the specification, and the examiner shall consider “the metal atom” to be “a metal atom of a cathode layer bonded to the ring-opening reaction product,” consistent with claim 9 and paragraphs [0011]–[0014] and [0091]–[0097]. Regarding claim 21, the instant claim recites “the surface layer is a monolayer or a bilayer” (claim 21, line 2). There is insufficient antecedent basis for “the surface layer” in the claim. Claim 21 depends from claim 1, which does not recite a “surface layer”; an “ETL surface layer” is first introduced in claims 8 and 10, from which claim 21 does not depend. It is unclear whether the “surface layer” is being recalled from claim 8/10 or a new “surface layer” is being introduced, rendering the claim indefinite. Clarification and/or correction are/is required. For the purpose of examination, the claim will be interpreted according to the specification, which describes a single surface layer of the ring-opening reaction product. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11, 13, 15, 17-20, 22 and 23 are allowed. Claims 12, 14, 16 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as set forth above; these claims would be allowable if amended to overcome the antecedent-basis issues, as they otherwise define allowable subject matter. The following is the examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art, CN 103642445 A (Zhang) discloses a surface-modified layer of an organic light-emitting diode ([0022] – [0028]); the composition comprises nano-silica particles having polar epoxy groups modified on the surface, and a modified layer comprising a reaction product [0064]–[0066]). Zhang modifies the surface with epoxy-functionalized silica particles, and therefore fails to teach or suggest, alone or in combination, a surface-modified electron transport layer of an OLED comprising a ring-opening reaction product between a nitrogen-containing heterocycle of the ETL and a three-membered ring, as required by claim 1. Furthermore, US 2007/0231560 A1 (Zhang2) discloses, a surface-modified layer ([0076]) whose surface may be subjected to modifying surface treatments to facilitate adhesion to an adjacent surface, and a resin layer that may include a curable/cross-linkable oxirane (epoxy) resin, including epoxy resins produced by reaction of a hydroxyl-, carboxyl-, or amine-containing compound with epichlorohydrin ([0049]–[0052]). Zhang2 is directed to a thermal-management resin structure and, like CN 103642445 A, fails to teach or suggest a ring-opening reaction product between the nitrogen-containing heterocycle of an OLED ETL and an oxiranyl, aziridinyl, or thiiranyl ring. Therefore, the prior art of record CN 103642445 A (Zhang) and US 2007/0231560 A1 (Zhang2), alone or in combination, and in combination with the other claimed features, fails to disclose, the limitation of independent claim 1: “the ETL comprising a ring-opening reaction product between a nitrogen-containing heterocycle of the ETL and one or more of an optionally substituted three-membered ring selected from the group consisting of an oxiranyl ring, an aziridinyl ring, and a thiiranyl ring”. Neither reference of record teaches or suggests this surface-localized, metal-anchoring ring-opening chemistry, and there is no proper rationale — absent impermissible hindsight reconstruction based on applicant’s own disclosure — to arrive at the claimed subject matter by combining the references of record. This determination is consistent with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in parent PCT/US2021/039035, which found the corresponding subject matter novel and inventive over the same closest art. Specifically, the aforementioned ‘the ETL comprising a ring-opening reaction product between a nitrogen-containing heterocycle of the ETL and one or more of an optionally substituted three-membered ring selected from the group consisting of an oxiranyl ring, an aziridinyl ring, and a thiiranyl ring,’ is material to the inventive concept of the application at hand to provide a thin, surface-localized chemistry that helps the cathode bond at the surface while limiting metal penetration into the ETL. Dependent claims 2–11, 13, 15, 17–20, 22 and 23 are allowable at least by virtue of their dependence from allowable claim 1. Examiner’s search note. The examiner considered the international search of record (ISA/US, PCT/US2021/039035) and further conducted a text search of the U.S. and foreign patent literature and of non-patent (scholarly) literature directed to OLED electron-transport-layer surface modification, ring-opening reactions of imidazole/phenanthroline heterocycles with oxiranyl/aziridinyl/thiiranyl rings, betaine-type surface functionalities, and cathode-interface metal-penetration barriers. No reference was located that teaches or suggests the surface ring-opening chemistry of claim 1 as applied to the nitrogen-containing heterocycle of an OLED ETL. US 2015/0060831 A1 (Ciszek) is noted as additional background: it teaches surface modification of an organic semiconductor by an addition reaction rather than a ring-opening of a nitrogen heterocycle, and likewise does not teach the claimed subject matter. Examiner’s Note (Additional Prior Arts) The examiner included a few prior arts which were not used in the rejection but are relevant to the disclosure. US 2015/0060831 A1 (Ciszek) - Surface-modified organic semiconductors are disclosed. The surface-modified thin films comprising a first layer comprising a polyaromatic organic semiconductor and a surface layer in direct contact with the first layer, the surface layer comprising an addition reaction product of the polyaromatic organic semiconductor with, for example, a dienophile, wherein the first layer is substantially free of the addition reaction product of the organic semiconductor with the dienophile. Also provided are surface-modified single crystals comprising a core comprising a polyaromatic organic semiconductor and a coating in direct contact with the core, the coating comprising, for example, an addition reaction product of the polyaromatic organic semiconductor with a dienophile, wherein the core is substantially free of the addition reaction product of the organic semiconductor with the dienophile. US 2023/0217675 A1 (Takenaka) - A light-emitting element is disclosed including an anode electrode, cathode electrode, an EML, and an HTL. The HTL includes a hole transport material, and a first polymer containing a polysiloxane bond in the main chain and having a functional group including a π-conjugated electron pair in a side chain of the first polymer. US 2020/0161592 A1 (Shin) - An organic light-emission device is disclosed including a first electrode, a second electrode, and the light-emission layer interposed therebetween, wherein the light-emission layer contains a mesogenic polymer-based light-emission material and a chiral dopant, wherein the light-emission layer has one face facing the first electrode and an opposite face facing the second electrode, wherein molecules of the mesogenic polymer-based light-emission material in the one face are orientated in a first predetermined direction, while molecules of the mesogenic polymer-based light-emission material in the opposite face are orientated in a second predetermined direction different from the first predetermined direction, wherein an angle of the second predetermined direction relative to the first predetermined direction is defined as a twisted angle, and wherein molecules of the mesogenic polymer-based light-emission material are vertically arranged in a spirally twisted manner within the twisted angle between the one and opposite faces of the light-emission layer to form a twisted structure. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to S M SOHEL IMTIAZ whose telephone number is (408) 918-7566. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM, M-F, PST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christine S. Kim can be reached at 571-272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S M SOHEL IMTIAZ/Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2812 07/29/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696613
LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690265
FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR WITH ISOLATION STRUCTURE AND RELATED METHOD
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684925
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12685000
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677481
ARRAY SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 555 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month