Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/006,569

PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION ELEMENT AND IMAGING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 23, 2023
Examiner
FOX, BRANDON C
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
686 granted / 800 resolved
+17.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
824
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 800 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is a Non-Final office action based on application 18/006,569 filed January 23, 2023. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-6, 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hasegawa (Pre-Grant Publication 2019/0371863) in in view of Murata (Pre-Grant Publication 2017/0092876). Regarding claim 1, Hasegawa discloses a photoelectric conversion element comprising: a first electrode (Fig. 1, 15a); a second electrode (18) disposed to be opposed to the first electrode; and an organic photoelectric conversion layer (17) provided between the first electrode and the second electrode and including a first organic semiconductor material, a second organic semiconductor material, and a third organic semiconductor material (Paragraph [0063]), the second organic semiconductor material having a Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) level such as -6.06, which is deeper than a Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) level such as -4.50 of the first organic semiconductor material and has a difference of 1.0 eV or more and 2.0 eV or less from the LUMO level of the first organic semiconductor material (Paragraph [0203] Table 4 & 5), the third organic semiconductor material having a crystalline property (Paragraph [0078) and having an optical absorption edge wavelength of 550 nm or less (Table 6). Hasegawa does not disclose the third organic semiconductor material having a linear absorption coefficient of 10000 cm-1 or less in a visible light region. However Murata discloses a photoelectric conversion device comprising: a photoelectric conversion layer (30) wherein the photoelectric conversion layer can have a absorption coefficient of 1x104 cm-1 (10000) (Paragraph [0047]). It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to form a photoelectric layer having a absorption coefficient such as 1x104 cm-1 because it will allow the photoelectric conversion layer to be formed at a reduced thickness thereby avoiding high resistance, low mobility and/or low carrier density and increasing sensitivity and high speed response (Paragraph [0025]). Regarding claim 3, Hasegawa further discloses: the first organic semiconductor material comprises an electron-transporting material (Paragraph [0064]), the second organic semiconductor material comprises a dye material (Paragraph [0205]), and the third organic semiconductor material comprises a hole-transporting material (Paragraph [0074]). Regarding claim 4, Hasegawa further discloses: the first organic semiconductor material comprises fullerene or a derivative thereof (Paragraph [0064]) Regarding claim 5, Hasegawa further discloses: the second organic semiconductor material comprises a donor-acceptor dye material (Paragraph [0205]). Regarding claim 6, Hasegawa further discloses: the second organic semiconductor material has local maximum absorption at a wavelength band of 380 nm or more and 750 nm or less (Paragraph [0068]). Regarding claim 10, Hasegawa disclose an image device comprising: Multiple pixels (Fig. 11, 1a;Paragraph [0150]) each provided with one or more photoelectric conversion elements including; a first electrode (Fig. 1, 15a); a second electrode (18) disposed to be opposed to the first electrode; and an organic photoelectric conversion layer (17) provided between the first electrode and the second electrode and including a first organic semiconductor material, a second organic semiconductor material, and a third organic semiconductor material (Paragraph [0063]), the second organic semiconductor material having a Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital (HOMO) level such as -6.06, which is deeper than a Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) level such as -4.50 of the first organic semiconductor material and has a difference of 1.0 eV or more and 2.0 eV or less from the LUMO level of the first organic semiconductor material (Paragraph [0203] Table 4 & 5), the third organic semiconductor material having a crystalline property (Paragraph [0078) and having an optical absorption edge wavelength of 550 nm or less (Table 6). Hasegawa does not disclose the third organic semiconductor material having a linear absorption coefficient of 10000 cm-1 or less in a visible light region. However Murata discloses a photoelectric conversion device comprising: a photoelectric conversion layer (30) wherein the photoelectric conversion layer can have an absorption coefficient of 1x104 cm-1 (10000) (Paragraph [0047]). It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to form a photoelectric layer having a absorption coefficient such as 1x104 cm-1 because it will allow the photoelectric conversion layer to be formed at a reduced thickness thereby avoiding high resistance, low mobility and/or low carrier density and increasing sensitivity and high speed response (Paragraph [0025]). Regarding claim 11, Hasegawa further discloses: in each of the pixels, one or multiple organic photoelectric conversion sections (11g) and one or multiple inorganic photoelectric conversion sections (11b/11r) are stacked, the one or the multiple inorganic photoelectric conversion sections performing photoelectric conversion of a wavelength region (blue & red) different from the organic photoelectric conversion section (green) (Paragraph [0054]). Regarding claim 12, Hasegawa further discloses: the inorganic photoelectric conversion section is formed to be embedded in a semiconductor substrate, and the organic photoelectric conversion section is formed on a side of a first surface of the semiconductor substrate (Fig. 1) Regarding claim 13, Hasegawa further discloses: the semiconductor substrate has a second surface opposed to the first surface, and a multilayer wiring layer (51) is formed on a side of the second surface. Claim(s) 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hasegawa (Pre-Grant Publication 2019/0371863) in in view of Murata (Pre-Grant Publication 2017/0092876) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Saturo (Japanese Publication 2019/096632). Regarding claim 2, Hasegawa and Murata disclose all of the limitations of claim 1 (addressed above). Neither explicitly disclose the first, second, and third organic semiconductor material comprises a low molecular compound having a molecular weight of 2000 or less. However Saturo discloses a photoelectric conversion device comprising: A photoelectric conversion layer including a first, second, and third organic semiconductor layer (Fig. 5, 1/2/3) wherein the organic semiconductor layers comprise a low molecular material wherein the molecular weight can be 1500 or less (Paragraph [0051]). It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to form the layer of the photoelectric conversion layer as low molecular weight material will serve to form a photoelectric conversion device having low dark current and high sensitivity (Paragraph [0007]). Claim(s) 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hasegawa (Pre-Grant Publication 2019/0371863) in in view of Murata (Pre-Grant Publication 2017/0092876) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Matsuo (Pre-Grant Publication 2019/0214417). Regarding claims 7-9, Hasegawa and Murata disclose all of the limitations of claim 1 (addressed above). Neither explicitly disclose the first electrode includes multiple electrodes. However Matsuo discloses a photoelectric conversion device comprising: the first electrode includes multiple electrodes independent of each other, such as a charge readout electrode (Fig. 1, 21a) and a charge accumulation electrode (21b) wherein a voltage is individually applied to the electrodes (Paragraph [0117]). It would have been obvious to those having ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to form the first electrode as a charge readout electrode and a charge accumulation electrode because it will serve to suppress reset noise and improve image quality (Paragraph [0117]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON C FOX whose telephone number is (571)270-5016. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeff W Natalini can be reached at 571-272-2266. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDON C FOX/Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /DAVID VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598785
Semiconductor Devices and Methods of Manufacturing
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593476
FIN FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR DEVICE WITH HYBRID CONDUCTION MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588213
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY STRUCTURE HAVING ENHANCED MEMORY WINDOW AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588291
SUBSTRATES INCLUDING MICRO-STRUCTURED THIN FILM CAPACITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581635
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 800 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month