Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/007,208

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 27, 2023
Examiner
SWANSON, WALTER H
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Rohm Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
608 granted / 815 resolved
+6.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
847
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.5%
+8.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 815 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Withdrawal of Indicated Allowable Subject Matter In light of prior art reference Ishimatsu, the indicated allowability of claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17 is withdrawn. Applicant is advised that the Notice of Allowance mailed 21 OCT 2025 is vacated. If the issue fee has already been paid, applicant may request a refund or request that the fee be credited to a deposit account. However, applicant may wait until the application is either found allowable or held abandoned. If allowed, upon receipt of a new Notice of Allowance, applicant may request that the previously submitted issue fee be applied. If abandoned, applicant may request refund or credit to a specified Deposit Account. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10 DEC 2025 was filed after the mailing date of the Notice of Allowance on 21 OCT 2025. The submission follows the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the IDS is being considered by the examiner. New Grounds of Rejection A new ground of rejection, prior art reference Ishimatsu (WO 2019235267), appears below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows (Graham Factors): 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Mihashi (JP H0884057; below, “Mihashi” – previously cited 27 JAN 2023 IDS noted reference) with evidence from and/or in view of Ishimatsu (WO 2019235267; below, “Ishimatsu” – 10 DEC 2025 IDS noted reference). At least “combining prior art elements”, “simple substitution”, “obvious to try”, and “applying a known technique to a known device” rationales support a conclusion of obviousness. MPEP § 2143(A)-(G). RE 1, Mihashi, in Figures 7, 8, and related text, e.g., paragraphs [0067] to [0085], discloses a semiconductor device (Example 4) comprising: PNG media_image1.png 378 676 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 602 542 media_image2.png Greyscale a first semiconductor element (6 - N-type MOS transistor for pull-up) configured to receive a first driving signal (signal a) inputted thereto and to switch between an electrical communication state and a blocked state in accordance with the first driving signal (signal a); a first control element (14 - inverter, 27 - NOR gate) configured to receive a first input signal (signal c) inputted thereto and to generate the first driving signal (signal a) based on the first input signal (signal c) and outputs the first driving signal (signal a) to the first semiconductor element (6); a second semiconductor element (3 - N-type MOS transistor for pull-down) configured to receive a second driving signal (signal b) inputted thereto and to switch between an electrical communication state and a blocked state in accordance with the second driving signal (signal b); a second control element (13 - inverter, 26 - NOR gate) configured to receive a second input signal (signal d) inputted thereto and to generate the second driving signal (signal b) based on the second input signal (signal d) and outputs the second driving signal (signal b) to the second semiconductor element (3): (see Ishimatsu for: a first lead that includes a first terminal portion for inputting the first input signal and a second lead that includes a second terminal portion for inputting the second input signal), wherein the first control element (14, 27) is configured to receive the second input signal (signal d) inputted thereto, and when determining, based on the second input signal (signal d), that the second semiconductor element (3) is in the electrical communication state, the first control element (14, 27) delays switching (Td1 - prevents simultaneous-on of transistors 3 and 6 - see Figure 8 timing chart) of the first semiconductor element (6) from the blocked state to the electrical communication state (see Figures 7, 8, and written opinion of the International Searching Authority (ISR submitted 27 JAN 2023)), (see Ishimatsu for: the first lead is in electrical communication with the first control element (14, 27) and the second control element (13, 26), and the second lead is in electrical communication with the second control element (13, 26)). Mihashi is silent regarding: a first lead that includes a first terminal portion for inputting the first input signal and a second lead that includes a second terminal portion for inputting the second input signal; and the first lead is in electrical communication with the first control element and the second control element, and the second lead is in electrical communication with the second control element. PNG media_image3.png 616 974 media_image3.png Greyscale Ishimatsu, in FIG. 2 and related text, e.g., paragraphs [0042] to [0062], teaches a first lead (frames 33U, 33V, 33W) that includes a first terminal portion for inputting a first input signal and a second lead (frames 34U, 34V, 34W) that includes a second terminal portion for inputting a second input signal; and the first lead (frames 33U, 33V, 33W) is in electrical communication (wires 62) with a first control element (25H – substitute for 14) and the second control element (25L – substitute for 13, 26), and the second lead (frames 34U, 34V, 34W) is in electrical communication (wires 62) with the second control element (25L). Mihashi and Ishimatsu are analogous art from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to modify Mihashi as taught by Ishimatsu because: 1. element mounting structures are realized that dissipate heat and provide electrical connections; and 2. all the claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR), 550 U.S. 398 (2007). RE 2, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the second input signal (signal d) is a rectangular pulse wave that has an on-level and an off-level, the first control element (14, 27) does not switch the first semiconductor element (6) to the electrical communication state until a first period elapses after the second input signal (signal d) has been switched from the on-level to the off-level, and the first period is set based on a first transition time that starts when the second driving signal (signal b) is output from the second control element (13, 26) to the second semiconductor element (3) in order to switch the second semiconductor element (3) from the electrical communication state to the blocked state and terminates when the second semiconductor element (3) is switched from the electrical communication state to the blocked state (see Figures 7, 8, and ISR submitted 27 JAN 2023). RE 3, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 2, wherein the first period is equal to or longer than the first transition time, and the first semiconductor element (6) is switched from the blocked state to the electrical communication state based on the first driving signal (signal a) after the first period has elapsed (e.g., [0085] - see Figures 7, 8, and ISR submitted 27 JAN 2023). RE 5, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 1, further including a first connection member (62) connected to the first control element (Ishimatsu’s 25L in lieu of 14), wherein the first connection member (62) is in electrical communication with the second lead (frames 34U, 34V, 34W). RE 6, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 5, wherein the second control element (13, 26) receives the first input signal inputted thereto and when determining, based on the first input signal, that the first semiconductor element (6) is in the electrical communication state, the second control element (13, 26) delays switching (see Figure 8 timing chart) of the second semiconductor element (3) from the blocked state to the electrical communication state. RE 7, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 6, wherein the first input signal (signal c) is a rectangular pulse wave that has an on-level and an off-level (see Figure 8 timing chart), the second control element (13, 26) does not switch the second semiconductor element (3) to the electrical communication state until a second period elapses after the first input signal (signal c) has been switched from the on-level to the off-level, and the second period is set based on a second transition time that starts when the first driving signal (signal a) is output from the first control element (14, 27) to the first semiconductor element (6) in order to switch the first semiconductor element (6) from the electrical communication state to the blocked state and terminates when the first semiconductor element (6) is switched from the electrical communication state to the blocked state. RE 8, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 7, wherein the second period is equal to or longer than the second transition time, and the second control element (13, 26) generates the second driving signal (signal b) in order to switch the second semiconductor element (3) from the blocked state to the electrical communication state after the second period has elapsed. RE 9, modified Mihashi is silent regarding the semiconductor device according to claim 7, wherein the second input signal (signal d) is an inverted signal obtained by inverting the first input signal (signal c). Regarding the underlined portion of claim 9, the Office understands applicant’s desire to use broad method language instead of claim terms limited to a particular structural embodiment. Applicants are reminded that the method of forming a device is not germane to the issue of patentability of the device itself. "[E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695,698,227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985). RE 10, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 6, further including a second connection member (62) connected to the second control element (Ishimatsu’s 25H in lieu of 13), wherein the second connection member (62) is in electrical communication with the first lead (frames 33U, 33V, 33W). RE 11, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 10, further including: a substrate (40) having a first surface; and a wiring pattern (beneath 50) made of a conductive material that is formed on the first surface, wherein the wiring pattern (beneath 50) includes a first wiring portion that is in electrical communication with the first lead (Ishimatsu’s 33U, 33V, 33W), and a second wiring portion that is in electrical communication with the second lead (Ishimatsu’s 34U, 34V, 34W), the first connection member is connected to the second wiring portion, and the second connection member is connected to the first wiring portion. RE 12, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 11, wherein the wiring pattern (beneath 50) includes a third wiring portion to which at least one of the first control element (14, 27) and the second control element (13, 26) is joined. RE 13, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 10, wherein the first lead (Ishimatsu’s 33U, 33V, 33W) includes a first conductive portion that is electrically connected to the first terminal portion, the second lead (Ishimatsu’s 34U, 34V, 34W) includes a second conductive portion that is electrically connected to the second terminal portion, the first connection member is connected to the second conductive portion, and the second connection member is connected to the first conductive portion. RE 14, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 13, further including a third lead (Ishimatsu’s 34A, 34B, 34C, 34D) to which at least one of the first control element (14, 27) and the second control element (13, 26) is joined. RE 15, Mihashi, in Figures 7, 8, and related text, e.g., paragraphs [0067] to [0085], discloses a semiconductor device (Example 4) comprising: a first semiconductor element (6 - N-type MOS transistor for pull-up) configured to receive a first driving signal (signal a) inputted thereto and to switch between an electrical communication state and a blocked state in accordance with the first driving signal (signal a); a first control element (14 - inverter, 27 - NOR gate) configured to receive a first input signal (signal c) inputted thereto and to generate the first driving signal (signal a) based on the first input signal (signal c) and outputs the first driving signal (signal a) to the first semiconductor element (6); a second semiconductor element (3 - N-type MOS transistor for pull-down) configured to receive a second driving signal (signal b) inputted thereto and to switch between an electrical communication state and a blocked state in accordance with the second driving signal (signal b); and a second control element (13 - inverter, 26 - NOR gate) configured to receive a second input signal (signal d) inputted thereto and to generate the second driving signal (signal b) based on the second input signal (signal d) and outputs the second driving signal (signal b) to the second semiconductor element (3), wherein the first control element (14, 27) is configured to receive the second input signal (signal d) inputted thereto, and when determining, based on the second input signal (signal d), that the second semiconductor element (3) is in the electrical communication state, the first control element (14, 27) delays switching (Td1 - prevents simultaneous-on of transistors 3 and 6 - see Figure 8 timing chart) of the first semiconductor element (6) from the blocked state to the electrical communication state (see Figures 7, 8, and written opinion of the International Searching Authority (ISR submitted 27 JAN 2023)), wherein the first semiconductor element (6) includes a first electrode (e.g., drain), a second electrode (e.g., source), and a third electrode (e.g., gate), and the first driving signal (signal a) is input to the third electrode (gate) to switch between a state in which the first electrode (drain) and the second electrode (source) are in electrical communication with each other and a state in which these electrodes are blocked from each other, and the second semiconductor element (3) includes a fourth electrode (e.g., drain), a fifth electrode (e.g., source), and a sixth electrode (e.g., gate), and the second driving signal (signal b) is input to the sixth electrode (gate) to switch between a state in which the fourth electrode (drain) and the fifth electrode (source) are in electrical communication with each other and a state in which these electrodes are blocked from each other (see Figures 7, 8, and ISR submitted 27 JAN 2023), the semiconductor device further including: (see Ishimatsu for: a fourth lead on which the first semiconductor element is mounted and that is in electrical communication with the first electrode (drain); a fifth lead on which the second semiconductor element is mounted and that is in electrical communication with the fourth electrode (drain) and the second electrode (source); and a sixth lead that is in electrical communication with the fifth electrode (source)). Mihashi is silent regarding a fourth lead on which the first semiconductor element is mounted and that is in electrical communication with the first electrode (drain); a fifth lead on which the second semiconductor element is mounted and that is in electrical communication with the fourth electrode (drain) and the second electrode (source); and a sixth lead that is in electrical communication with the fifth electrode (source). Ishimatsu, in FIG. 2 and related text, e.g., paragraphs [0042] to [0062], teaches a fourth lead (e.g., 31) on which the first semiconductor element (11U, 11V, 11W in lieu of 6) is mounted and that is in electrical communication (wires 62) with the first electrode (drain); a fifth lead (e.g., 32U, 32V, 32W) on which the second semiconductor element (12U, 12V, 12W in lieu of 3) is mounted and that is in electrical communication with the fourth electrode (drain) and the second electrode (source); and a sixth lead (e.g., 35U, 35V, 35W) that is in electrical communication (wires 62) with the fifth electrode (source). Mihashi and Ishimatsu are analogous art from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the instant application to modify Mihashi as taught by Ishimatsu because: 1. element mounting structures are realized that dissipate heat and provide electrical connections; and 2. all the claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR), 550 U.S. 398 (2007). RE 17, modified Mihashi discloses the semiconductor device according to claim 15, wherein a DC voltage is applied between the fourth lead (31) and the sixth lead (35U, 35V, 35W), the DC voltage is converted to an AC voltage by switching of the first semiconductor element (6) between the electrical communication state and the blocked state (e.g., Mihashi [0067]-[0074]) and switching of the second semiconductor element (3) between the electrical communication state and the blocked state, and the AC voltage is applied to the fifth lead (32U, 32V, 32W). Claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17 are rejected. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Walter Swanson whose telephone number is (571) 270-3322. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday, 8:30 to 17:30 EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez, can be reached on (571)270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (20) (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WALTER H SWANSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 27, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604494
GATE END CAP AND BOUNDARY PLACEMENT IN TRANSISTOR STRUCTURES FOR N-METAL OXIDE SEMICONDUCTOR (N-MOS) PERFORMANCE TUNING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593708
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING STACKED SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURINGTHE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12563714
Buried Signal Wires for Memory Applications
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550746
SUBSTRATE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12546939
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 815 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month