Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/007,789

POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL, POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL LAYER, SECONDARY BATTERY, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND VEHICLE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 02, 2022
Examiner
LA RAIA III, LAWRENCE
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
20 granted / 27 resolved
+9.1% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
70
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 27 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status This Office action is responsive to amendments and remarks filed on 12/17/2025. Claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 have been amended. Claim 6 is newly added. Claims 1-6 are currently pending. Response to Amendment In light of the amendment the objection to the drawings is withdrawn. In light of the amendment the objection to the abstract is withdrawn. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20160013478 A1, SATOW et al. Regarding claim 1. [0010] A secondary battery comprising: [0011] a positive electrode; and [0012] a negative electrode, wherein the positive electrode comprises a positive electrode active material comprising lithium cobalt oxide, called lithium cobaltate, nickel, magnesium, and aluminum, and wherein SATOW does not explicitly disclose the positive electrode active material comprises a plurality of projections having crystallinity, However, when the reference discloses all the limitations of a claim except a property or function, and the examiner cannot determine whether or not the reference inherently possesses properties which anticipate or render obvious the claimed invention but has basis for shifting the burden of proof to applicant as in In re Fitzgerald, 619 F.2d 67, 205 USPQ 594 (CCPA 1980). See MPEP § § 2112- 2112.02. SATOW does not explicitly disclose the crystallinity of the projections as claimed in the instant application, however because SATOW [0124] uses a solution of fluorine and a rare earth element along with a heat treatment of 500 °C it would be reasonable to conclude that the properties of the instantly claimed invention e.g. the crystallinity of the coating would also be the same. Regarding claim 2. The secondary battery according to claim 1, [0012] wherein the positive active material comprises fluorine, and [0020] wherein a concentration of fluorine in a surface portion of the positive electrode active material is higher than a concentration of fluorine in a central portion of the positive electrode active material SATOW discloses 0.558% fluorine. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20160013478 A1, SATOW et al. Regarding claim 3. SATOW does not disclose a vehicle comprising the secondary battery disclosed by SATOW according to claim 1. By the effective date of the instant application electric vehicles are widespread due to the cost of petroleum products and are an obvious use in vehicles at the time the application was filed. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use the battery disclosed by SATOW in order to have a more economical vehicle. Claims 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 20040229124 A1, MIYAMOTO et al. in view of US 20160013478 A1, SATOW et al. Regarding claim 4, MIYAMOTO [0207] discloses a method for forming a positive electrode active material, comprising: [0214] forming a first mixture where a first material is a halogen compound comprising lithium in the form of lithium fluoride [0214], a second material comprises magnesium [0192], and a third material that is lithium cobalt oxide called lithium cobaltate [0266] are mixed; [0235] forming a second mixture by heating the first mixture under a first temperature condition; forming a third mixture where the second mixture and a fourth material that comprises nickel [0267] are mixed; forming a fourth mixture where the third mixture, a fifth material that comprises zirconium [0267], and a sixth material that comprises aluminum [0192] are mixed; and [0239] forming a fifth mixture by heating the fourth mixture under a second temperature condition, wherein the heating the first mixture and the heating the fourth mixture is performed in an atmosphere comprising oxygen, wherein [0235] the first temperature condition is in a first temperature higher than or equal to 742 °C and lower than or equal to 950 °C, MIYAMOTO discloses preferably 700 °C -950 °C, MIYAMOTO does not disclose the second temperature condition is in a second temperature higher than or equal to 500 °C and lower than or equal to 1000 °C. SATOW [title] discloses A Positive Electrode For Nonaqueous Electrolyte Secondary Battery and Nonaqueous Electrolyte Secondary Battery That Uses The Positive Electrode SATOW [0124] discloses the second temperature condition is 500 °C or less while spraying the mixture in order to attach the fluorine to part of the active material surface, and that this is “[a]n example of the method for causing a compound containing fluorine and any one of a rare earth element, magnesium, titanium, and aluminum to attach to part of the surface of lithium cobaltate and/or lithium nickel cobalt manganate is a method that involves causing a compound containing a rare earth element, magnesium, titanium, or aluminum to attach to a positive electrode active material and then spraying an aqueous solution containing fluorine.” SATOW [0012] discloses “A positive electrode active material includes a mixture of lithium nickel cobalt manganate and lithium cobaltate having a compound adhered to part of a surface thereof, the compound containing fluorine and at least one selected from zirconium, magnesium, titanium, aluminum” SATOW [0013] goes on to disclose that this “exhibits an advantageous effect of suppressing the decrease in discharge capacity in low-temperature discharge during charge and discharge after the battery in a charged state is exposed to high temperature.” It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to have used the temperature of 500 °C in the method disclosed by SATOW in the active material mixture disclosed by MIYAMOTO in order to coat the active material particles with a fluorine zirconium aluminum coating. SATOW further provides motivation to this person of ordinary skill by disclosing that this produces an advantageous effect of suppressing the decrease in discharge capacity in low-temperature discharge during charge and discharge after the battery is in a charged state and is exposed to high temperature. Regarding claim 5. MIYAMOTO modified by SATOW discloses the method for forming a positive electrode active material according to claim 4, wherein MIYAMOTO [0252] the step of forming the third mixture is performed by a solid phase method, and wherein MIYAMOTO [0261] the step of forming the fourth mixture is performed by a sol-gel method. Regarding claim 6. MIYAMOTO modified by SATOW discloses the method for forming a positive electrode active material according to claim 4, wherein SATOW discloses the second temperature 500 °C is lower than the first temperature range preferred by MIYAMOTO [0235] of 700 °C - 950 °C. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAWRENCE LA RAIA III whose telephone number is (703)756-5441. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thur 6:00am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at (571) 272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LAWRENCE LA RAIA III Examiner Art Unit 1727 /L.L./Examiner, Art Unit 1727 /BARBARA L GILLIAM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 08, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12512469
POSITIVE ELECTRODE, LITHIUM BATTERY INCLUDING POSITIVE ELECTRODE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12500260
PRESSING JIG WITH A GRADIENT HARDNESS PRESSING PAD FOR A BATTERY CELL AND A DEGASSING METHOD OF BATTERY CELL USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12476278
ALL SOLID STATE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12469877
ALL SOLID STATE BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Patent 12451557
Gas Removing Device and Method for Removing Gas From a Pouch Type Case of a Secondary Battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.7%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 27 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month