Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/025,213

EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT MODEL, PROGRAM, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND SIMULATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Mar 08, 2023
Priority
Sep 22, 2020 — JP 2020-158048 +1 more
Examiner
WATHEN, BRIAN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 487 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
492
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§103
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 487 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because none of the claims are directed to statutory subject matter. Claim 1 is directed to an “equivalent circuit model”. A model is not a process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. Claim 2 is directed to a program, which is software per se. Software per se is not a process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. MPEP §2106.03(I). Claim 3 is directed to a computer-readable recording medium, the broadest reasonable interpretation of which is as a signal per se. See, MPEP §2106.03(I) (“Transitory forms of signal transmission (often referred to as "signals per se"), such as a propagating electrical or electromagnetic signal or carrier wave”). Claim 4 is directed to “a simulation device” but no actual physical structures are recited and the claim distinguishes the simulation device from an actual computer. Accordingly, the claim is not directed to any of the stator categories. See, MPEP §2106.03(I) (“Non-limiting examples of claims that are not directed to any of the statutory categories include: Products that do not have a physical or tangible form, such as information (often referred to as "data per se") or a computer program per se (often referred to as "software per se") when claimed as a product without any structural recitations”). Examiners Note: The claims as discussed above fail the subject matter eligibility test at Step 1 as outlined in MPEP §2106(III). Applicants should ensure that any amendments to overcome the §101 rejection fully meet Steps 2A and 2B as well. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Schefler et al., “Modelling an anti-ferroelectric ceramic capacitor for time and frequency domain simulations of power systems” teaches modelling AFE ceramic capacitors using equivalent circuits. Morris et al. (US 2019/0371802) teaches an anti-ferroelectric capacitor memory cell. Slesazeck et al. (US 2020/0357453) teaches a ferroelectric memory and logic cell and operation method. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN W WATHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5570. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Trujillo can be reached at 571-272-3677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIAN W. WATHEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2151 /BRIAN W WATHEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2151
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699384
DIGITAL TWIN MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION OF PRODUCTION PROCESSES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699819
METHODS AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING FIBER PLACEMENT START LOCATIONS FOR MANUFACTURING A LAMINATED COMPOSITE COMPONENT
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12694168
Simulation of the behavior of a vehicle in a fluid by Hamiltonian neural network
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682134
PREDICTION PROGRAM, PREDICTION METHOD, AND PREDICTION DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12670229
SOLUTION SYSTEM, SOLUTION METHOD, AND SOLUTION PROGRAM
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 487 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month