Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/028,674

DEVICE FOR GROWING SINGLE CRYSTALS, IN PARTICULAR SINGLE CRYSTALS OF SILICON CARBIDE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 27, 2023
Priority
Sep 28, 2020 — AT A 50817/2020 +1 more
Examiner
SONG, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
1714
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ebner Industrieofenbau GmbH
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 915 resolved
-4.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.4%
+19.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 08/18/2026 has been entered. Election/Restrictions Newly submitted claims 12-21 are directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: The groups of inventions listed above do not relate to a single general inventive concept under PCT Rule 13.1 because, under PCT Rule 13.2, they lack the same or corresponding special technical features for the following reasons: Group I (claims 1-11) and Group II (claims 12-21) lack unity of invention because even though the inventions of these groups require the technical feature of a crucible having multiple parts and a crucible cover in a chamber, this technical feature is not a special technical feature as it does not make a contribution over the prior art in view of the rejection of claim 1 over the Takashima (JP 2015-168600) and JP 61-106896U in the final office action filed 04/02/2026 . Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention, this invention has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 12-21 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. To preserve a right to petition, the reply to this action must distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. Otherwise, the election shall be treated as a final election without traverse. Traversal must be timely. Failure to timely traverse the requirement will result in the loss of right to petition under 37 CFR 1.144. If claims are subsequently added, applicant must indicate which of the subsequently added claims are readable upon the elected invention. Should applicant traverse on the ground that the inventions are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the inventions to be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 08/18/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive because the arguments are directed to the method claims which were withdrawn by election by original presentation. Applicant canceled all the apparatus claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J SONG whose telephone number is (571)272-1468. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kaj Olsen can be reached at 571-272-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MATTHEW J. SONG Examiner Art Unit 1714 /MATTHEW J SONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1714
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Oct 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 29, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742258
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR GROWING SCINTILLATION CRYSTALS WITH MULTI-COMPONENT GARNET STRUCTURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734464
CRYSTALLIZATION DEVICE, CRYSTALLIZATION SYSTEM, AND CRYSTALLIZATION METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735805
SUSPENDED LIFTING DEVICE FOR DIVERSION CYLINDER
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723324
SINGLE CRYSTAL INGOT PULLER WITH HIGH-POWER LASER BEAM AS AUXILIARY HEATING SOURCE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723325
DUAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS FOR A MONO-CRYSTAL FURNACE AND METHODS FOR PULLING A MONO-CRYSTAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+13.9%)
3y 8m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month