Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/029,883

TO-BE-EVAPORATED SUBSTRATES, DISPLAY SUBSTRATES AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 31, 2023
Examiner
WOLDEGEORGIS, ERMIAS T
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
526 granted / 743 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
792
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
68.7%
+28.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/11/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Claims 5 and 6 have been cancelled; claims 1, 7, 9 and 14 have been amended; claim 15 has been newly added; and claims 1-4 and 7-15 are currently pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 7-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KO et al. (US 2010/0033084 A1, hereinafter “KO”) in view of LI (US 2018/0090545 A1, hereinafter “LI”). In regards to claim 1, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) a to-be-evaporated substrate, comprising: a substrate (100), comprising a to-be-evaporated region (150) and a non-evaporated region (200), wherein the non-evaporated region (200) surrounds (See, for example, Fig. 3) the to-be-evaporated region (150); and a support pattern, disposed on the substrate and located in the non-evaporated region (See, for example, Fig. 2B), wherein, the support pattern comprises a first symmetrical pattern, the first symmetrical pattern is formed by a plurality of supporters (It can be seen from figure 2B that each spacer comprises a first symmetric pattern and consists of a plurality of support structures, which are distributed along the periphery of a region to be evaporated), and the plurality of supporters forming the first symmetrical pattern are arranged along a perimeter of the to-be-evaporated region (wherein any pixel is a region to be evaporated, the pixel region is a second symmetric pattern, and an axis of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincides with an axis of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern; the first symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; the second symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; and the two axes of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincide with the two axes of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern in a manner of corresponding to each other on a one-to-one basis.) KO is silent about wherein the number of to-be-evaporated regions is multiple, the to-be-evaporated regions comprise a first-type to-be-evaporated region, a second-type to-be-evaporated region, and a third-type to-be-evaporated region, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region, the second-type to-be-evaporated region, and the third-type to-be-evaporated region are used to evaporate different materials; wherein the third-type to-be-evaporated region comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region and the second-type to-be-evaporated region comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively; or the second-type to-be-evaporated region comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region and the third-type to-be-evaporated region comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively. LI while disclosing OLED pixel array teaches (See, for example, Figs. 4A-4C) wherein the number of to-be-evaporated regions is multiple, the to-be-evaporated regions comprise a first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ), a second-type to-be-evaporated region (B), and a third-type to-be-evaporated region (G), and the first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ), the second-type to-be-evaporated region (B) , and the third-type to-be-evaporated region (G) are used to evaporate different materials; wherein the third-type to-be-evaporated region (G) comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing (See, for example, Fig. 4C), and the first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ) and the second-type to-be-evaporated region (B ) comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively (See, for example, Figs. 4A, and 4B). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Ko by LI because having two adjacent subpixels of the same color are evaporated through the same mask opening using the same organic material would improve display resolution by allowing larger mask openings to serve multiple subpixels, reduces color mixing between adjacent subpixels of different colors, and prevents mask deformation by widening the bridge structure between mask openings in a high pixels-per-square inch OLED manufacturing. In regards to claim 14, KO discloses (See, for example, Fig. 1-4) a method of manufacturing a display substrate, comprising: preparing a mask and a to-be-evaporated substrate, wherein the to-be-evaporated substrate comprises: a substrate (100), comprising a to-be-evaporated region (150) and a non-evaporated region (200), wherein the non-evaporated region (200) surrounds (See, for example, Fig. 3) the to-be-evaporated region (150); and a support pattern, disposed on the substrate and located in the non-evaporated region (See, for example, Fig. 2B), wherein, the support pattern comprises a first symmetrical pattern, the first symmetrical pattern is formed by a plurality of supporters (It can be seen from figure 2B that each spacer comprises a first symmetric pattern and consists of a plurality of support structures, which are distributed along the periphery of a region to be evaporated), and the plurality of supporters forming the first symmetrical pattern are arranged along a perimeter of the to-be-evaporated region (wherein any pixel is a region to be evaporated, the pixel region is a second symmetric pattern, and an axis of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincides with an axis of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern; the first symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; the second symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; and the two axes of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincide with the two axes of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern in a manner of corresponding to each other on a one-to-one basis); forming a light emitter (See, Fig. 4) by performing evaporation (depositing an emission layer, Par [0040]) on the to-be-evaporated region (150) using the mask (300). KO is silent about wherein the number of to-be-evaporated regions is multiple, the to-be-evaporated regions comprise a first-type to-be-evaporated region, a second-type to-be-evaporated region, and a third-type to-be-evaporated region, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region, the second-type to-be-evaporated region, and the third-type to-be-evaporated region are used to evaporate different materials; wherein the third-type to-be-evaporated region comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region and the second-type to-be-evaporated region comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively; or the second-type to-be-evaporated region comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing, and the first-type to-be-evaporated region and the third-type to-be-evaporated region comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively. LI while disclosing OLED pixel array teaches (See, for example, Figs. 4A-4C) wherein the number of to-be-evaporated regions is multiple, the to-be-evaporated regions comprise a first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ), a second-type to-be-evaporated region (B), and a third-type to-be-evaporated region (G), and the first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ), the second-type to-be-evaporated region (B) , and the third-type to-be-evaporated region (G) are used to evaporate different materials; wherein the third-type to-be-evaporated region (G) comprises two to-be-evaporated sub-regions arranged in a spacing (See, for example, Fig. 4C), and the first-type to-be-evaporated region (R ) and the second-type to-be-evaporated region (B ) comprise one to-be-evaporated sub-region respectively (See, for example, Figs. 4A, and 4B); forming a light emitter (See, “OLED pixel array”, Abstract) by performing evaporation (“two R sub-pixels or two G sub-pixels are evaporated in one mask (R or G mask) opening”, See, for example, Par [0026]) on the to-be-evaporated region using the mask (Mask Plate). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Ko by LI because having two adjacent subpixels of the same color are evaporated through the same mask opening using the same organic material would improve display resolution by allowing larger mask openings to serve multiple subpixels, reduces color mixing between adjacent subpixels of different colors, and prevents mask deformation by widening the bridge structure between mask openings in a high pixels-per-square inch OLED manufacturing. PNG media_image1.png 388 584 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 2, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the to-be-evaporated region (150) is presented as a second symmetrical pattern, and a symmetrical axis of the first symmetrical pattern coincides with a symmetrical axis of the second symmetrical pattern (wherein any pixel is a region to be evaporated, the pixel region is a second symmetric pattern, and an axis of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincides with an axis of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern; the first symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; the second symmetric pattern comprises two axes of symmetry that are perpendicular to each other; and the two axes of symmetry of the first symmetric pattern coincide with the two axes of symmetry of the second symmetric pattern in a manner of corresponding to each other on a one-to-one basis). In regards to claim 3, KO discloses (See, annotated Fig. 2A below) the first symmetrical pattern comprises two symmetrical axes (X-axis and Y-axis) perpendicular to each other; the to-be-evaporated region (150) is presented as a second symmetrical pattern, the second symmetrical pattern comprises two symmetrical axes (X-axis and Y-axis) perpendicular to each other; and the two symmetrical axes of the first symmetrical pattern (for example, 150a, 150b, or 150c) are respectively coincided with the two symmetrical axes (X-axis and Y-axis) of the second symmetrical pattern (200). PNG media_image2.png 696 860 media_image2.png Greyscale In regards to claim 4, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the plurality of supporters each comprise a plurality of support columns arranged in a spacing (See, for example, Fig. 4). In regards to claim 7, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4, and See annotated Fig. 2A included above) the two to-be-evaporated sub-regions are presented as two symmetrical patterns, symmetrical axes of two to-be-evaporated sub-regions (X-axis and Y-axis) in one of the at least one of the to-be-evaporated regions (150) coincide with each other, and the symmetrical axes (X-axis and Y-axis) of the to-be-evaporated sub-regions (for example, 150a, 150b) coincide with a symmetrical axis of the first symmetrical pattern (200). In regards to claim 8, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the plurality of to-be-evaporated sub-regions (150a, 150b) in one of at least one of the to-be-evaporated regions are used to evaporate a same evaporation material (See, for example, Pars [0040]-[0042]). In regards to claim 9, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the number of first symmetrical patterns (See, for example, 150a, 150b, 150c) is multiple, the to-be-evaporated regions are in one-to-one correspondence with the first symmetrical patterns (200), and two of the first symmetrical patterns share at least one of the supporters (See, for example, Fig. 3). In regards to claim 10, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) two to-be-evaporated regions (150, See Fig. 3) corresponding to the two first symmetrical patterns (200) sharing at least one of the supporters are used to evaporate a same evaporation material or different evaporation materials (See, for example, Fig. 4 and Pars [0040]-[0042]). In regards to claim 11, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the supporters each comprise a support layer and a plurality of protrusions (200, See, for example, Fig. 4), the support layer is disposed on the substrate (100), the plurality of protrusions (See, the protrusions of 200, in Fig. 4) are disposed on a side of the support layer away from the substrate (100), and the plurality of protrusions are arranged in a spacing (See, for example, Fig. 4). In regards to claim 12, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) the substrate comprises: a base (100); a pixel definition layer (120), disposed on a side of the base, wherein the pixel definition layer (120) comprises one or more pixel openings (openings defined in between 120, See, Fig. 3); wherein the to-be-evaporated region (150) comprises one or more to-be-evaporated sub-regions (150a, 150b, 150c), and the pixel opening (openings defined in between 120, See, Fig. 3) forms the to-be-evaporated sub-region (See, for example, Fig. 4). In regards to claim 13, KO discloses (See, for example, Figs. 1-4) a display substrate, comprising: the to-be-evaporated substrate of claim 1; a light emitter (See, Par [0020]), disposed in the to-be-evaporated region (150). In regards to claim 15, KO as modified above discloses (See, for example, Fig. 4A, LI) the two to-be-evaporated sub-regions (for example, R ) are arranged symmetrically, and a symmetrical axis of the two to-be-evaporated sub-regions (for example, R ) coincides with a symmetrical axis of the first symmetrical pattern (See, annotated Fig. 4A below, where one can see that the symmetrical axis of the two to-be-evaporated sub-regions coincides with the symmetrical axis of the first symmetrical pattern). PNG media_image3.png 308 620 media_image3.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 and 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS whose telephone number is (571)270-5350. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8 am - 5 pm E.S.T.. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERMIAS T WOLDEGEORGIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 31, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 25, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598902
Display Module and Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593457
MULTI-STATE FERROELECTRIC-RAM WITH STACKED CAPACITORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588365
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588398
TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580019
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.9%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month