Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/030,296

METHODS AND NODES FOR MEASURING A SERVING CELL IN L1/L2-CENTRIC MOBILITY

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Apr 05, 2023
Examiner
SHAHEED, KHALID W
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
694 granted / 840 resolved
+20.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
881
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.2%
+8.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 840 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/8/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant contends the rejection does not anticipate the claimed subject matter. Here applicant contends there is a mischaracterization of what Luo disclose. More specifically, applicant suggests Luo’s disclosure relates to how measurement results from multiple Aps sharing the same PCI are processed, not to choosing between different PCIs as recited. Here, the measurement result corresponds to the PCI [0019]. Specifically, a selected measurement result corresponds to a PCI. So, selecting of acceptable measurement results corresponds to selection of a particular PCI. Examiner has further clarified Luo EP 2911436 B1 to disclose a method in a wireless device configured with multiple Physical Cell Identities (PCls) for a mobility procedure (see physical cell identifier, [0011]), wherein the wireless device is configured with one or more cells operating in a same serving frequency, each cell associated with one or more PCls (see LUO on par. [0011]: "a user equipment (UE, User Equipment) performs signal measurement according to different physical cell identifiers (PC/, Physical Cell Identifier) that are of a serving cell and a neighboring cell of the serving cell, and cell-specific reference signals (see claim 2 of Luo, CRS, Cell-specific reference signals) separately corresponding to these different PC/s"), the method comprising: selecting a PCI among the multiple PCls (see LUO on par. [0014]: "the UE selects a maximum value from a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a weighted sum of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a mathematical expectation of a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PCI', regarding PCI); determining cell measurement (see [0011] determining, by the user equipment, regarding measurement result) results based on cell measurements performed on the selected PCI (see LUO on par. [0014]: "the UE selects a maximum value from a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a weighted sum of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a mathematical expectation of a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/"), wherein the cell measurements represent measurements of a serving cell (see LUO on see par. [0015]: "the PC/ is a PC/ of a serving cell'); and determining whether or not to trigger an event for measurement reporting, based on the cell measurement results (see LUO on par. [0003]: "the UE can neither make a measurement event decision according to a signal measurement result of each one of the multiple APs of the same PC/, nor report the signal measurement result to the base station for implementation of a cell handover for the UE''). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4, 8, 33, 36 & 48 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Luo EP 2911436 B1 (from information disclosure statement). In regards to claim 1, Luo discloses a method in a wireless device configured with multiple Physical Cell Identities (PCls) for a mobility procedure (see physical cell identifier, [0011]), wherein the wireless device is configured with one or more cells operating in a same serving frequency, each cell associated with one or more PCls (see LUO on par. [0011]: "a user equipment (UE, User Equipment) performs signal measurement according to different physical cell identifiers (PC/, Physical Cell Identifier) that are of a serving cell and a neighboring cell of the serving cell, and cell-specific reference signals (see claim 2 of Luo, CRS, Cell-specific reference signals) separately corresponding to these different PC/s"), the method comprising: selecting a PCI among the multiple PCls (see LUO on par. [0014]: "the UE selects a maximum value from a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a weighted sum of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a mathematical expectation of a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PCI', regarding PCI); determining cell measurement (see [0011] determining, by the user equipment, regarding measurement result) results based on cell measurements performed on the selected PCI (see LUO on par. [0014]: "the UE selects a maximum value from a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a weighted sum of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/; or the UE selects a mathematical expectation of a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PC/"), wherein the cell measurements represent measurements of a serving cell (see LUO on see par. [0015]: "the PC/ is a PC/ of a serving cell'); and determining whether or not to trigger an event for measurement reporting, based on the cell measurement results (see LUO on par. [0003]: "the UE can neither make a measurement event decision according to a signal measurement result of each one of the multiple APs of the same PC/, nor report the signal measurement result to the base station for implementation of a cell handover for the UE''). Regarding claims 33 and 48, Luo discloses the method in a network node and a wireless device comprising a communication interface, the method and wireless device comprising: - sending a configuration to a wireless device for configuring the wireless device (see [0006], “receives, from a base station, measurement configuration”) with multiple Physical Cell Identities (PCIs) for a mobility procedure (see [0043], “Further, if the serving cell and the neighboring cell have different PCIs”), wherein the wireless device is configured with one or more cells operating in a same serving frequency (see [0020] the PCI is a PCI of a serving cell, or the PCI is a PCI of a neighboring cell of a serving cell), each cell being associated with one or more PCIs (see [0015], “the PCI is a PCI of a serving cell, or the PCI is a PCI of a neighboring cell of a serving cell.”); and - receiving a report including cell measurements performed based on a PCI selected among the multiple PCIs, wherein the cell measurements represent measurements of a serving cell (see [0043], “ Further, if the serving cell and the neighboring cell have different PCIs, the UE may obtain a first measurement result and second measurement result of multiple APs of the serving cell, and may also obtain a first measurement result and second measurement result of multiple APs of the neighboring cell.”). Regarding claims 4 and 36, Luo discloses the method of claim 1 and 33, wherein selecting the PCI comprises selecting a PCI of a cell with which the wireless device transitioned to a connected state and/or a cell to which the wireless device is handed over (see handover [0011]) and/or a cell for which the wireless device receives the configuration for the mobility procedure (see configuration [0012]). Regarding claim 8, Luo discloses the method of calim 1, wherein performing the cell measurements based on the selected PCI comprises performing cell measurements based on the second PCI (see [0019], “to select a mathematical expectation from a set consisting of the first measurement results of all APs in the multiple APs as the second measurement result corresponding to the PCI”). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3, 34-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luo EP 2911436 B1. Regarding claim 2 and 34, Luo discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the mobility procedure is at least one of a change and activation (cell handover decision [0011]) of a cell or a PCI by the wireless device Luo does not specifically disclose however Liang discloses upon receipt of at least one of Layer 1 (L1) signaling and Layer 2 (L2) signaling (see layer 1 and layer 2, see DCI of physical layer, i.e. layer 1 and MAC is RRC/MAC layer which is layer 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Liang with that of Luo. Doing so would conform to notoriously well-known standards of the OSI reference models. Regarding claim 3 and 35, Luo discloses the method of claim 2. However Luo does not specifically disclose what Liang discloses wherein the L1 signaling comprises a downlink Control information (DCI) and the L2 signaling comprises a Medium Access Control (MAC) Control Element (CE) (see layer 1 and layer 2, see DCI of physical layer, i.e. layer 1 and MAC is RRC/MAC layer which is layer 2); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to combine the teachings of Liang with that of Luo. Doing so would conform to notoriously well-known standards of the OSI reference models. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5-6, 9-14 and 37-38 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to K. WILFORD SHAHEED whose telephone number is (469) 295-9175. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9 am-6pm; CST; ALT Friday. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. The examiner’s Supervisor, Jinsong Hu, can be reached at (571)272-3965, where attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHALID W SHAHEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 17, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587228
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR A NETWORK DEVICE TRANSCEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581450
Wireless Communications Method and Related Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574792
PREDICTIVE TRANSMISSION RATE ADAPTATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574453
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD FOR PERFORMING COMMUNICATION CONNECTION WITH PERIPHERAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574775
EARLY MEASUREMENT REPORTING VERIFICATION FOR NON-CONNECTED MODE USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 840 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month