Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/030,518

MODULATORS OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 06, 2023
Examiner
VISHNYAKOVA, ELENA VLADIMIROVNA
Art Unit
1691
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
12 granted / 20 resolved
At TC average
Strong +73% interview lift
Without
With
+72.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
52
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 20 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to applicant’s filing dated January 9, 2026. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of claims Claims 1 – 23 and 25 are pending in the instant application. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of compound 272 PNG media_image1.png 158 141 media_image1.png Greyscale as a single elected species in the reply filed on January 9, 2026 is acknowledged. Upon performing the search of prior art Examiner detected compounds related to non-elected species. Hence, the election of species has been withdrawn and examination will proceed to the full scope of claims 1 – 23 and 25. All claims 1 – 23 and 25 are under consideration in the present office action. Priority The present application is a 371 of PCT/US2021/053863, filed October 3, 2021, and claims the benefits of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/089,000, filed October 7, 2020. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 01/05/2024 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1 – 20 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Makings et al (US 8,642,609 B2, hereinafter Makings). Regarding claims 1 – 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20 and 25, drawn to a compound of Formula I: PNG media_image2.png 238 395 media_image2.png Greyscale , such as compound of Formula (Ia) , PNG media_image3.png 257 378 media_image3.png Greyscale , Formula (Ib) PNG media_image4.png 251 374 media_image4.png Greyscale , Formula (Ic) PNG media_image5.png 209 373 media_image5.png Greyscale or Formula (Id) PNG media_image6.png 281 408 media_image6.png Greyscale , where: W is e.g. Ring A, where Ring A is -C3-6 cycloalkyl, -C5-10 aryl (e.g. phenyl), 5-10 membered heterocyclyl (e.g. PNG media_image7.png 98 106 media_image7.png Greyscale or PNG media_image8.png 102 84 media_image8.png Greyscale ), and 5-10 membered heteroaryl; R1 is -halogen, -OH, -C1-6 alkyl, -NH2, C3-4 cycloalkyl, phenyl; Y is e.g. Ring B and Ring B is -C5-10 cycloalkyl, -C5-6 aryl (e.g. phenyl), 4-10-membered heterocyclyl (e.g. PNG media_image9.png 104 111 media_image9.png Greyscale ), and 5-10-membered heteroaryl (e.g. PNG media_image10.png 108 217 media_image10.png Greyscale , PNG media_image11.png 106 113 media_image11.png Greyscale ); R2 is -halogen, -OH, -C1-6 alkyl, -NH2, 4-10-membered heterocyclyl (e.g. PNG media_image12.png 72 122 media_image12.png Greyscale or PNG media_image13.png 105 115 media_image13.png Greyscale ), 5-10-membered heteroaryl, -C3-10 cycloalkyl, phenyl; X is hydrogen, halogen, -C1-6 alkyl; Ring C is -C3-7 cycloalkyl, -C5-6 aryl (e.g. phenyl), 6-membered heterocyclyl, and 5-10 membered heteroaryl (e.g. pyrazole); R3 is hydrogen, halogen, -OH, -C1-6 alkyl, -NH2, 6-membered heterocyclyl. One of the exemplary compounds of Formula (I) is compound ex. 272 PNG media_image1.png 158 141 media_image1.png Greyscale . Instant claims are further drawn to a pharmaceutical composition, comprising compound of Formula (I), one or more additional therapeutic agent and pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Said compounds and compositions are useful in the method for treating cystic fibrosis. Makings teaches compounds of formula I: PNG media_image14.png 117 142 media_image14.png Greyscale , such as compounds of formula I-A PNG media_image15.png 106 137 media_image15.png Greyscale , I-B PNG media_image16.png 108 125 media_image16.png Greyscale or I-C PNG media_image17.png 107 126 media_image17.png Greyscale (column 15, lines 15 – 33), where: RA is an optionally substituted 3-12 membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic or bicyclic ring having 0-4 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur. Examples of RA are: PNG media_image18.png 67 143 media_image18.png Greyscale , PNG media_image19.png 77 137 media_image19.png Greyscale , PNG media_image20.png 84 143 media_image20.png Greyscale , PNG media_image21.png 89 113 media_image21.png Greyscale , PNG media_image22.png 91 116 media_image22.png Greyscale , PNG media_image23.png 85 108 media_image23.png Greyscale , PNG media_image24.png 66 111 media_image24.png Greyscale , where q is 0, 1, 2, or 3, each occurrence of U-RU is hydrogen, F, Cl, Br, -NH2, -C1-C6 alkyl, 3-8-membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic ring having 0-3 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur (columns 16 – 19, and 23); R2 is hydrogen, halogen or -C1-6 alkyl; R3 is optionally substituted phenyl, phenyloxy or T-Rz where T is a bond or -O- and Rz is an optionally substituted 3-12 membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic or bicyclic ring having 0-4 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur (column 7, lines 5 – 12 and 17 – 42); L is G2 -B-G3 -Ar1, where G2 is -NR’- (e.g. -NH-), B is C1 alkylidene chain wherein methylene unit in the alkylidene chain is replaced with -SO2-; G3 is absent and Ar1 is a 3-8-membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic ring having 0-3 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur. For example Ar1 is PNG media_image25.png 77 107 media_image25.png Greyscale (column 22, lines 30 – 35). Ar1 is optionally substituted with WRW, where m is 0-5, W is a bond or C1 alkylidene chain wherein methylene unit in the alkylidene chain is replaced with -NR- (R is hydrogen), and RW is hydrogen or an optionally substituted group selected from a C1-C8 aliphatic group, a 3-8-membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic ring having 0-3 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur (column 8, lines 9 – 29). Compounds, taught by Makings have the same pyrimidine core and structural elements, where variable RA is corresponding to variable Y of instantly clamed compounds, variable R2 of Makings is corresponding to variable X of instantly clamed compounds, variable R3 of Makings is corresponding to variable W of instantly clamed compounds and variable L of Makings is corresponding to fragment PNG media_image26.png 96 138 media_image26.png Greyscale of instantly clamed compounds. Makings further teaches the pharmaceutically acceptable compositions, where compositions comprise compounds of formula I and pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Said compositions optionally further comprise one or more additional therapeutic agents (e.g. CFTR modulator). The compounds and compositions, taught by Makings, are useful in the method for treating Cystic fibrosis (column 339, lines 32 –37 and 60 - 67). Regarding limitations of claims 8 and 16, which recite ring A is phenyl optionally substituted with 1-3 methyl groups, or exemplary structures of Ring A, where Ring A is a heterocyclic saturated or unsaturated ring unsubstituted or substituted with methyl group(s) (e.g. PNG media_image7.png 98 106 media_image7.png Greyscale or PNG media_image8.png 102 84 media_image8.png Greyscale ), Makings teaches variable R3, where R3 is an optionally substituted phenyl or R3 is T-Rz where T is a bond or -O- and Rz is an optionally substituted 3-12 membered saturated, partially unsaturated, or fully unsaturated monocyclic or bicyclic ring having 0-4 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur. Variable R3 corresponds to variable Ring A of instantly claimed structures. All the exemplary structures recited by claim 16 fall under above description of structure of variable R3 taught by Makings. Although Makings does not explicitly teach phenyl or other ring is substituted with methyl, the term “optionally substituted” indicates that any substituent, including methyl, is allowed in this fragment of the molecular structure. Regarding limitations of claim 10, which recites Ring C is phenyl substituted with NH2 or pyrazole substituted with methyl. Makings teaches variable Ar1, which corresponds to Ring C of instantly claimed structures. Makings teaches that Ar1 has a structure of phenyl substituted e.g. -NH2 (see the description above). Although Makings does not explicitly teach where Ar1 is a pyrazole substituted with methyl, however pyrazole substituted with methyl falls under the description of structure of Ar1 as 3-8 membered fully unsaturated monocyclic ring having 0-3 heteroatoms such as nitrogen, substituted with C1-C8 aliphatic group, since pyrazole substituted with methyl is a 5-membred heteroaromatic ring with two nitrogen atoms as ring members and methyl is a C1 alkyl group. Regarding limitations of claim 13, which recites exemplary structures of variable R2, Makings teaches variable U-RU, which corresponds to variable R2 of instantly claimed structures, where U-RU is a 3-8-membered saturated or partially unsaturated monocyclic ring having 0-3 heteroatoms independently selected from nitrogen, oxygen, or sulfur. All the structure shown in instant claim 13 fall under description of structure of variable U-RU taught by Makings. Regarding limitations of claims 18, which recites exemplary compounds of Formula (I), although Makings does not explicitly teach the same exemplary structures, however, Makings teaches all the structural elements of the molecule of instantly claimed compounds. Thus, since Makings teaches compounds, which compounds have the same core and all the structural elements as instantly claimed compounds, and where the compounds taught by Makings are useful for the same method (method of treating cystic fibrosis), it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to modify teachings of prior art and make various known compounds useful for the same method, to arrive at claimed compounds. The one of ordinary skills would be motivated to do so in search of an active agent with improved desired properties to treat Cystic fibrosis with the reasonable expectation of success. Claims 21 - 23, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Makings et al (US 8,642,609 B2) as applied to claims 1 – 20 and 25 above, and further in view of Haseltine et al (WO 2019/018395 A1, hereinafter Haseltine). Makings teaches all the limitations of claims 21 – 23 as discussed supra and are applied here in the same manner, except where the composition comprises tezacaftor and ivacaftor or the composition comprises tezacaftor and deutivacaftor. However, Haseltine teaches compositions and methods of treating the CFTR-mediated disease cystic fibrosis comprising administering Compound I PNG media_image27.png 181 383 media_image27.png Greyscale (CAS RN: 2216712-66-0, Elexacaftor) and at least one additional component (page 3, [0012]). The at least one additional active pharmaceutical ingredient is: Compound II PNG media_image28.png 166 362 media_image28.png Greyscale (CAS RN: 1152311-62-0, Tezacaftor); Compound III PNG media_image29.png 130 214 media_image29.png Greyscale (CASRN: 873054-44-5, Ivacaftor) or Compound III-d PNG media_image30.png 134 238 media_image30.png Greyscale (CAS RN: 1413431-07-8, Deutivacaftor) (pages 8 – 9, [0042]). Haseltine further teaches pharmaceutical compositions where Compound I (Elexacaftor) and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof is administered in combination with Tezacaftor (Compounds II) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and Ivacaftor (Compound III). Another variation of the pharmaceutical composition taught by Haseltine is where Compound I (Elexacaftor) and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof is administered in combination with Tezacaftor (Compounds II) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and Deutivacaftor (Compound III-d) and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof page 11, [0045]). Although instant claims do not recite Elexacaftor as one of the components of instantly claimed pharmaceutical composition, “comprising” claim language does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or steps. Thus, since Makings teaches compounds and compositions thereof, which compounds and compositions are useful in the method of treatment of Cystic fibrosis, where the composition further comprises one or more additional therapeutic agent, such as CFTR modulator, and since Haseltine teaches pharmaceutical compositions, useful in the method of treatment of Cystic fibrosis, where the compositions comprise CFTR modulators Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor or the compositions comprise Tezacaftor and Deutivacaftor, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to modify compositions of Haseltine by introducing compounds taught by Makings to arrive at a claimed pharmaceutical compositions. The one of ordinary skills would be motivated to do so in search of pharmaceutical composition effective in the method of treatment of Cystic fibrosis with the reasonable expectation of success. Therefore, taking all together, taught by prior art, the invention as a whole is prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made, as evidenced by the references, especially in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Conclusion Claims 1 – 23 and 25 are rejected. No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELENA V VISHNYAKOVA whose telephone number is (571)272-3781. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am - 5pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RENEE CLAYTOR can be reached at (571)272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.V.V./Examiner, Art Unit 1691 /RENEE CLAYTOR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1691
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 06, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582672
VANADIUM COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570680
COMPOSITIONS OF MECHANICALLY INTERLOCKED, TOPOLOGICALLY COMPLEX CROSSLINKERS AND POLYMERS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564589
METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER, REDUCING SIDE EFFECTS OF CANCER TREATMENT, AND PREVENTING THE RECURRENCE OF CANCER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552789
1H-PYRROLO[2,3-C]PYRIDINE COMPOUNDS AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12466801
Cannabichromene Derivatives And Use Thereof
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 11, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+72.7%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 20 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month