Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/032,318

CODEBOOK AND PMI OVERRIDE IN DOWNLINK MU-MIMO TRANSMISSION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 17, 2023
Examiner
IM, THEODORE
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
2 (Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 5 resolved
-18.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
53
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
67.1%
+27.1% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 5 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s representative filed arguments on 02/09/2026 with respect to independent claim 1 has been considered and are not persuasive. Specifically, applicant presented arguments on Pages 7-10 that the combination of ZHANG and Kuo does not specifically teach “selecting a non-antenna-grouping codebook for downlink multi-user multiple input, multiple output (MU-MIMO) transmission; determining a second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook based on the first PMI of the antenna-grouping codebook; and performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming toward the UE based on the second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook.” Examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s arguments. The amended claim language describes that a non-antenna-grouping codebook is selected for downlink multi-user multiple input, multiple output (MU-MIMO) transmission. The claim reflects a determination of a second PMI associated with the non-antenna-grouping codebook based on a first PMI associated with an antenna-grouping codebook. The combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches the feature “selecting a non-antenna-grouping codebook for downlink multi-user multiple input, multiple output (MU-MIMO) transmission (Applicant argues that a “subband” in ZHANG does not correspond to a non-antenna-grouping codebook because a subband refers to a frequency partition rather than a predefined beamforming codebook. However, ZHANG teaches selecting a precoding matrix W2 from a codebook according to PMI2, where W2 represents a channel characteristic of a sub-band and is used for transmission in MU-MIMO scenarios. Thus, ZHANG discloses selecting a beamforming precoder from a codebook for transmission, which corresponds to the claimed non-antenna-grouping codebook under the broadest reasonable interpretation of the claim. See [0034]-[0035], [0223]); determining a second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook based on the first PMI of the antenna-grouping codebook (Applicant argues that ZHANG does not disclose determining a second PMI based on a first PMI because ZHANG determines a precoding matrix using both PMIs jointly, However, ZHANG discloses that the precoding matrix indicator includes PMI1 and PMI2, where PMI1 indicates a precoding matrix representing a long-term channel characteristic and PMI2 indicates a precoding matrix representing a short-term channel characteristic. Because the short-term precoding component indicated by PMI2 refines the long-term precoding configuration indicated by PMI1, the second PMI is determined based on the first PMI. See [0034]-[0035], [0266]-[0267]); and The combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically Kuo teaches the feature performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming toward the UE based on the second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook.” (Applicant argues that the cited references fail to disclose performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming based on the second PMI of the non-antenna codebook. However, Kuo teaches MU-MIMO transmission using beamforming technologies together with digital precoding based on a precoder selected from a codebook according to PMI feedback. Because the PMI corresponds to the precoder index used to select the precoding matrix applied for transmission, the beamforming operation is performed based on the PMI-selected precoder. Kuo further teaches MU-MIMO pairing using orthogonal precoding matrices. Thus, MU-MIMO beamforming and pairing are performed according to the precoding matrix selected based on PMI feedback. See [0055]-[0056], [0059], [0079]). [Therefore, the disclosures collectively teach selecting a non-antenna-grouping codebook for MU-MIMO transmission, determining a second PMI based on a first PMI, and performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming based on the second PMI. This sequence supports the described flow and content of the messages]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-3,11,14 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZHANG et al. (US 2016/0050000 A1; hereinafter “ZHANG”), in view of Kuo et al. (US 2021/0135716 A1; hereinafter “Kuo”). Regarding claim 1, ZHANG teaches a method (FIG. 2) of operating a network node ([0224] a transmit end), comprising: receiving a first precoding matrix indicator (PMI), from a UE ([0224] a receive end), wherein the first PMI is based on an antenna-grouping codebook ([0276] a transmit end receives a PMI sent by a receive end, the φn represents a phase difference between weighted values of a first antenna group of the transmit end and a second antenna group); selecting a non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band precoding matrix W2 selected from a codebook) for downlink multi-user multiple input, multiple output (MU-MIMO) transmission ([0035] determining, according to the PMI2, the W2 selected from the codebook by the receive end based on the reference signal, [0034] the W2 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a sub-band, [0223] The embodiments are applied to MU-MIMO scenarios); determining a second PMI ([0035] PMI2) of the non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band) based on the first PMI ([0035] PMI1) of the antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] wideband) ([0266]-[0267] disclose that PMI1 indicates a precoding matrix representing a long-term channel characteristic and PMI2 indicates a short-term channel characteristic, [0034]-[0035] W1 corresponds to a wideband (antenna-grouping) precoding matrix and W2 corresponds to a sub-band (non-antenna-grouping) precoding matrix. Thus, the short-term precoding component indicated by PMI2 is determined within the long-term precoding configuration indicated by PMI1, evidencing that the second PMI is determined based on the first PMI). However, ZHANG does not teach performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming toward the UE based on the second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook. In an analogous art, Kuo teaches performing MU-MIMO pairing and beamforming toward the UE based on the second PMI of the non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0055] Multiple users can be concurrently served in the same time/frequency resource (MU-MIMO) using beamforming technologies, [0056] digital beamforming comprises digital precoding using one or more digital precoder codebooks, [0059] a precoding matrix index (PMI) corresponding to the selected precoder from the codebook may be reported by the user terminal, [0079] MU-MIMO pairing using orthogonal precoding matrices). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the beamforming as taught by Kuo within the parameter of ZHANG. One would have been motivated to do so in order to enhance the signal gain and reduce potential interference to improve the system spectral efficiency (Kuo [0055]). Regarding claim 2, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches wherein the first PMI ([0035] the PMI1) comprises a first set of beam indices ([0034] the W1) of the antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] wideband) associated with the first PMI ([0035] The precoding matrix indicator PMI includes a first precoding matrix indicator PMI1, determining, by the transmit end according to the PMI1, the W1 selected from the codebook by the receive end based on the reference signal, [0034] the W1 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a wideband), wherein the second PMI ([0035] the PMI2) comprises a second set of beam indices ([0034] the W2) of non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band) associated with the second PMI ([0035] the precoding matrix indicator PMI includes a second precoding matrix indicator PMI2, determining, according to the PMI2, the W2 selected from the codebook by the receive end, [0034] the W2 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a sub-band). Regarding claim 3, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches wherein determining the second PMI of non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034]-[0035]) comprises selecting the second set of beam indices ([0034] the W2) for which a distance between a precoding matrix associated with the first set of beam indices ([0034] the W1) of antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] wideband) and a precoding matrix associated with the second set of beam indices of non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band) is minimized ([0034] the W1 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a wideband, and the W2 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a sub-band, [0234] the receive end calculates a channel capacity or a throughput or a chordal distance based on the channel estimation value, and selects the precoding matrix from the codebook according to a chordal distance minimization criterion, [0235] the receive end selects, from the codebook based on the reference signal, the precoding matrix W corresponding to the rank indicator). Regarding claim 11, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches determining the second PMI ([0035] PMI2) of non-antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band) according to a lookup table based on the first PMI ([0035] PMI1) of antenna-grouping codebook ([0034] wideband) received from the UE ([0067] the selecting unit is configured to perform row permutation or column permutation on the W according to an antenna serial number, wherein the row/column permutation based on antenna serial number corresponds to a predefined mapping (lookup) between W1 and W2 that determines the second PMI according to the first PMI). Regarding claim 14, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches determining the second set of beam indices ([0034] the W2) based on the second PMI ([0035] the PMI2) ([0035] determining, according to the PMI2, the W2 selected from the codebook by the receive end based on the reference signal). Regarding claim 18, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches wherein the network node comprises a distributed unit (DU) (FIG. 1A 104 RAN), the method further comprising transmitting a second PMI ([0035] the PMI2) and a codebook index corresponding to the non-antenna grouping codebook ([0034] sub-band) to a radio unit ([0059] The selected precoder index (e.g., a precoding matrix index (PMI)) is reported by the user terminal with a dedicated feedback mechanism, [0035] the precoding matrix indicator PMI includes a second precoding matrix indicator PMI2; determining according to the PMI2, the W2 selected from the codebook by the receive end based on the reference signal, [0034] the W2 is a matrix representing a channel characteristic of a sub-band). Regarding claim 19, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches a network node configured to perform operations ([0577] a network device to perform all or a part of the steps of the methods described in the embodiments of the present invention) according to claim 1. Regarding claim 20, the combination of ZHANG and Kuo, specifically ZHANG teaches a network node (FIG. 10 a device 1000), comprising: a processing circuit (FIG. 10 a processor 1001); a transceiver (FIG. 10 a sender 1003 and a receiver 1004) coupled to the processing circuit; and a memory (FIG. 10 a memory 1002) coupled to the processing circuit, wherein the memory comprises computer readable program instructions that, when executed by the processing circuit ([0577] functional units integrated into one processing unit), cause the network node to perform operations ([0578] stored in a storage medium for instructing a network device to perform all or a part of the steps of the method) according to claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4,15 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: PNG media_image1.png 229 791 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, either alone or in combination the prior arts fail to teach wherein determining the second set of beam indices is performed according to the following equation: PNG media_image2.png 24 121 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 15, either alone or in combination the prior arts fail to teach wherein the first PMI comprises a set of indicators of (i1,1, i1,2, i1,3, i2), the second PMI comprises a set of indicators of ( ), wherein the second set of beam indices is determined based on the following equations: wherein [l,l',m,m',n] corresponds to the second set of beam indices, wherein N1, N2 are configured channel state information-reference signal, CSI-RS, ports in horizontal and vertical directions, with corresponding over-sample rates of O1, O2, and wherein k1, and k2, are determined from a i1,3 to a k1, and k2, mapping table. Regarding claim 17, either alone or in combination the prior arts fail to teach wherein the i1,3 to k1 and k2 mapping is selected according to dominant direction of angle spread. Conclusion The following prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2017/0041051 A1 (Rahman et al.) discloses a codebook design and structure associated with a two dimensional transmit antenna array. US 2020/0007205 A1 (PARK et al.) discloses a method for reporting channel state information and a device that performs/supports this method. US 2026/0066962 A1 (Onggosanusi et al.) discloses the precoding of Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) data and dedicated reference signals with codebook-based feedback for multi-input multi-output (MIMO) transmissions. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE IM whose telephone number is (571)270-1955. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached on 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.I./ Examiner, Art Unit 2413 /UN C CHO/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 09, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12562794
CSI FEEDBACK METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12439446
WIRELESS TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON UNRELIABLE NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 2 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (+16.7%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 5 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month