Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/037,849

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OVER THE AIR COMMISSIONING OF DEVICES COMMUNICATING OVER A COMMUNICATION NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER
Filed
May 19, 2023
Priority
Nov 19, 2020 — IN 202021038165 +1 more
Examiner
TODD, GREGORY G
Art Unit
2443
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Spintly Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
39%
Grant Probability
At Risk
4-5
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
34%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 39% of cases
39%
Career Allowance Rate
173 granted / 447 resolved
-19.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
492
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
68.1%
+28.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 447 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is in response to applicant’s amendment and RCE filed, 08 August 2025, of application filed, with the above serial number, on 19 May 2023 in which claims 1-3, 8, 15-18, 20 have been amended and claims 10-12 have been cancelled. Claims 1-3, 8-9, 13-20 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 8-9, 13-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Hu et al (hereinafter “Hu”, 2019/0349252). As per Claim 1, Hu discloses a system (100) for over the air commissioning, the system (100) comprising: a wireless mesh network (at least paragraph 24; bluetooth mesh network); a server configured to provide network credentials for over the air commissioning, wherein the network credentials include a network key, and an address associated with the wireless mesh network (at least paragraph 25, 30, 38; Server 10b may thus determine whether it needs to perform provisioning operations for unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list of unprovisioned Bluetooth devices. It may actively generate provisioning data for the unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list.; Provisioning data examples including NetKey, AppKey and unicast address data); processing circuitry (104) that is coupled to the server, and configured to be commissioned to the wireless mesh network by way of the network credentials received from the server (at least Fig. 1; par. 27, 37, 72; Bluetooth gateway 10a generally includes at least one processing unit, at least one memory device, and a Bluetooth communication module; Server 10b and the plurality of Bluetooth gateways 10a may employ multiple forms of collaboration; the Bluetooth gateway may receive a provisioning instruction issued by the server and analyze the provisioning instruction to extract provisioning data); a plurality of devices, wherein a non-commissioned device of the plurality of devices generates and provides a request signal for commissioning (at least paragraph 65; unprovisioned Bluetooth devices notify nearby Bluetooth gateways through broadcasting when prepared to access the network) to one of: (i) the processing circuitry when the processing circuitry is in direct wireless range of the non-commissioned device such that the processing circuitry (a) receives the network credentials from the server based on the request signal and (b) commissions the non-commissioned device with the wireless mesh network based on the received network credentials; or (ii) a commissioned device of the plurality of devices that is in direct wireless range of both the processing circuitry and the non-commissioned device such that the processing circuitry (a) receives the request signal via the commissioned device, (b) receives the network credentials from the server based on the request signal, and (c) provide the network credentials to the commissioned device that is commissioned to the wireless mesh network such that the commissioned device commissions the non-commissioned device with the wireless mesh network based on the network credentials (at least paragraph 46; Each Bluetooth gateway in Bluetooth mesh network 10 may detect one unprovisioned Bluetooth device… the information about the unprovisioned Bluetooth devices that each Bluetooth gateway detects may be reported to server 10b; par. 49; Server 10b may directly issue the provisioning data to the destination Bluetooth gateway. As discussed previously, after the destination Bluetooth gateway receives the provisioning data, it may determine that there is a need to perform a provisioning operation on the detected, unprovisioned Bluetooth device using the provisioning data. A different approach may be that server 10b issues a provisioning instruction that includes the provisioning data for the destination Bluetooth gateway. With such an approach, after the destination Bluetooth gateway receives the provisioning instruction, it may learn of the need to perform a provisioning operation directed at the detected, unprovisioned Bluetooth device and then analyze the provisioning instruction and extract the provisioning data to perform a provisioning operation directed at the detected, unprovisioned Bluetooth device using the provisioning data). As per Claim 2. The system (100) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the request signal comprises a unique identifier (ID) associated with a first device (102a) of the plurality of devices such that the unique ID facilitate to identify one of, a location of the first device (102a), a type of the first device (102a), a wireless mesh network to which the first device (102a) is to be tagged to (at least paragraph 40; information about unprovisioned Bluetooth devices detected and reported by Bluetooth gateways 10a can include identifying information about the Bluetooth devices, e.g., universally unique identifiers (UUIDs). In some embodiments, information about the Bluetooth devices also includes signal strength information about the Bluetooth devices detected by Bluetooth gateways 10a, e.g., received signal strength indicators (RSSIs). UUIDs may include product IDs, media access control (MAC) addresses, and other information. A product ID may identify the Bluetooth device type, capabilities, and other such information. Server 10b may use the information). As per Claim 3. The system (100) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry is configured to provide the request signal to the server such that the server updates a list of non-commissioned devices by adding the non-commissioned device in the list (at least paragraph 38; Server 10b may thus determine whether it needs to perform provisioning operations for unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list of unprovisioned Bluetooth devices. It may actively generate provisioning data for the unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list.). As per Claim 8. The system (100) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the wireless mesh network (108) comprises one of, an Internet of Things (IOT) network, a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) network, a Zigbee network, or a combination thereof (at least paragraph 32, 17; Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) standard). As per Claim 9. The system (100) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of devices (102) comprises one of, IOT light bulbs, IOT light panels, IOT temperature sensors, IOT humidity sensors, IOT access control readers, IOT range extenders, or a combination thereof (at least paragraph 32; bluetooth lamp). As per Claim 13. The system (100) as claimed in claim 1, wherein the server (106) further comprises a database (112) that is configured to store the first device (102a) in a list of non-commissioned devices with the associated unique ID of the first device (102a) (at least paragraph 38; a user may pre-save a list of unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on server 10b. Server 10b may thus determine whether it needs to perform provisioning operations for unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list of unprovisioned Bluetooth devices. It may actively generate provisioning data for the unprovisioned Bluetooth devices on this list). As per Claim 14. The system (100) as claimed in claim 13, wherein the database (112) is further configured to store a list of commissioned devices and associated unique IDs of the commissioned devices (at least paragraph 38-40; eg. UUIDs). Claims 15-20 do not, in substance, add or define any additional limitations over claims 1, 2, 14, 8, 9, 3, respectively, and therefore are rejected for similar reasons, supra. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 8-9, 13-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY TODD whose telephone number is (303)297-4763. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Taylor can be reached on 571-272-3889. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGORY TODD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2443
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Feb 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER
Jun 03, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641006
Dynamic Expansion And Contraction Of Edge Clusters For Managing Access To Cloud-Based Applications
5y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12580996
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR PREDICTING DATA FOR PRECACHING AND/OR RECACHING AT A COMPUTER CACHE OF A COMPUTER ENVIRONMENT
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574347
VEHICLE NETWORK ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT
4y 9m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12556472
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PARALLELLY SENDING ROUTE ADVERTISEMENT MESSAGES
2y 8m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12513048
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING NETWORK SLICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
39%
Grant Probability
34%
With Interview (-4.6%)
4y 6m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 447 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month