Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Spintly Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates that the company's current active prosecution is focused on a specific matter, requiring a targeted strategy to address the requirements of the assigned examiner and art unit.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TODD, GREGORY G, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because this individual is the only examiner currently handling an active case for the company, their perspective and examination style will be the primary factor in the immediate progress of the portfolio. Practitioners should review the past decisions of the named examiner to prepare a response to the outstanding matter.
The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct art unit means that the administrative requirements for this portfolio relate to these specific points of contact. The absence of other pending matters means that the company's current advancement in its technology field depends on the outcome of this prosecution. Practitioners should focus on building an argument to navigate the case under the assigned official.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TODD, GREGORY G | 1 | 38.6% | -2.7% |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2443 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18037849 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OVER THE AIR COMMISSIONING OF DEVICES COMMUNICATING OVER A COMMUNICATION NETWORK | TODD, GREGORY G | 2443 | §102Other | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | May 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial