Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/038,514

ROTARY FOIL TRAP AND LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 24, 2023
Examiner
CHANG, HANWAY
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ushio Denki Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
538 granted / 626 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
691
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
34.8%
-5.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 626 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, claim 1 recites the limitation “a direction of centrifugal force applied to the foils by rotational operation”. It is unclear from the claim language on what performs the function of the limitation. The recited function does not follow from the structure recited in the claim (i.e. the foils or support member). It is unclear whether the function requires some other structure or is simply a result of operating the foils or support member in a certain manner. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would not be able to draw a clear boundary between what is and is not covered by the claim. See MPEP 2173.05(g) for more information. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wassink (US PGPub 2009/0045357, hereinafter Wassink). Regarding claim 1, Fig. 4 of Wassink discloses a plurality of foils (blades 5); and a supporting member (mounting elements) configured to support the plurality of foils (blades 5) (see paragraph [0053]), the plurality of foils (blades 5) each being made of a rolled thin plate (rolled sheet) that is tensile processed by rolling (see paragraph [0053], and a direction of centrifugal force applied to the foils by rotational operation coinciding or approximately coinciding with a rolling direction, which is a direction in which the foils are tensile processed (see paragraph [0053]). Regarding claim 2, Wassink discloses an angle between the direction of the centrifugal force and the rolling direction ranges between 0 and 20 degrees (see paragraph [0053]). Regarding claim 3, Wassink discloses the plasma generation unit is configured to excite a raw material (i.e. tin) emitting the light to generate the plasma (see paragraph [0048]), and the foils rotationally operate at a temperature at or above a melting point of the raw material (see paragraph [0004]). Regarding claim 4, Fig. 2 of Wassink discloses the rolling direction is a direction in which the crystal trains constituting the rolled thin plate are elongated (see paragraph [0053]). Regarding claim 5, Fig. 2 of Wassink discloses the rotary foil trap (foil trap 4) and the plasma generation unit (radiation source 2) (see paragraph [0049]). Regarding claim 6, Fig. 2 of Wassink discloses the light includes EUV light (EUV source 2) (see paragraph [0049]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HANWAY CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5766. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 AM - 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Kim can be reached at (571)272-2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Hanway Chang /HC/ Examiner, Art Unit 2881 /MICHAEL J LOGIE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597582
Charged Particle Beam Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12557588
METHODS OF CROSS-SECTION IMAGING OF AN INSPECTION VOLUME IN A WAFER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12520413
SAPPHIRE LAMP FOR LASER SUSTAINED PLASMA BROADBAND LIGHT SOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12476073
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE IMAGE-BASED PITCH WALK INSPECTION METHOD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE COMPRISING THE INSPECTION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12463003
HIGH TEMPERATURE ION SOURCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+2.9%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month