Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/038,520

SYSTEM FOR REPLY GENERATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 24, 2023
Priority
Dec 04, 2020 — GB 2019138.3 +1 more
Examiner
JACKSON, JAKIEDA R
Art Unit
2657
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Rolls-Royce plc
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
681 granted / 919 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
949
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.9%
-19.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 919 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on July 1, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicants amended the claims, however, after a review of the specification and drawings, it seems that there is a new matter issue. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. In particular, inputting the numbers corresponding to the words into encoder networks of the plurality of encoder-decoder models to generate respective context vectors representing semantic meaning of the input sentence, using decoder networks of the plurality if encoder-decoder models, a plurality of candidate responses in different emotional categories based on the respective context vectors, each candidate response comprising a complete sentence or paragraph for use as a reply in the conversation, receiving a probability score representing a likelihood that a respective candidate response matches the input sentence, ranking the candidate responses, selecting from a group of ranked candidate responses, just to list a few, is not described in the specification or drawings. The actual steps operating according to what is claimed along with the candidate responses are not claimed. The remaining dependent claims are rejected as they depend from independent claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAKIEDA R JACKSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7619. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 6:30a-2:30p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel Washburn can be reached at 571.272.5551. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAKIEDA R JACKSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 16, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706082
SPEECH TRANSLATION USING LATENCY BASED FILLER GENERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706090
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH REAL-TIME TRANSLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700396
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SYNTHETIC VOICE PIPELINES
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700412
CACHING SCHEME FOR VOICE RECOGNITION ENGINES
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700414
MULTI-CHANNEL SIGNAL ENCODING METHOD, MULTI-CHANNEL SIGNAL DECODING METHOD, ENCODING DEVICE, DECODING DEVICE, AND TERMINAL DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+15.7%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 919 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month