Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/040,346

METHODS AND ALGORITHMS OF DATA MULTIPLEXING AT PHY LAYER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Priority
Aug 07, 2020 — provisional 63/063,043 +1 more
Examiner
JAVAID, JAMAL
Art Unit
2412
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
858 granted / 970 resolved
+30.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1014
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
84.7%
+44.7% vs TC avg
§102
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 970 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Status of Case The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the RCE filed on 3/13/2026. Claims 1, 8, 13, 14, 21, 26, and 49-52 are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/13/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 8, 14, and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ZTE, “Consideration on scheduling enhancement for MTC,” 3GPP Draft; R1-1913318, Reno, Nevada, November 2019 (cited in Applicant’s IDS filed on 3/22/2023) (hereinafter “ZTE”) in view of Takeda (USPAN 2018/0310281). Consider claim 1, ZTE discloses a method implemented in a network node configured to communicate with a wireless device, WD, (see figure 2, reproduced below for convenience) the method comprising: scheduling using a single downlink control information, DCI, message a first transmission with repetition of a first transport block, TB, and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB (see section 3: “multi-TBs scheduling with DCI for unicast”; also, see figures 2 and 3), the repetitions of the first and second TBs being mapped to non-overlapping time-domain resources and the repetitions of first and second TBs being mapped to a same physical resource block, PRB, set (see section 3: in figures 2 and 3, the TBs use the same frequencies, in contrast to figure 4 where frequency hopping is used); and triggering the first transmission with repetition of the first TB and the second transmission with repetition of the second TB based on the single DCI scheduling (see section 3: “multi-TBs scheduling with DCI for unicast” and see figures 2 and 3). PNG media_image1.png 412 1062 media_image1.png Greyscale ZTE discloses a first transmission with repetition of the first TB and the second transmission with repetition of the second TB (see above). However, ZTE does not specifically disclose scheduling in one downlink control information, DCI, message a first transmission with a repetition of a first transport block and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB, and triggering via a scheduling command in the one DCI message to dynamically signal transmission of multiple transport blocks, the first TB associated with a first value for a scheduling parameter of the scheduling command, and the second TB associated with a second value for the scheduling parameter of the scheduling command. Takeda discloses scheduling in one downlink control information, DCI, message a first transmission with a repetition of a first transport block and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB, and triggering via a scheduling command in the one DCI message to dynamically signal transmission of multiple transport blocks, the first TB associated with a first value for a scheduling parameter of the scheduling command, and the second TB associated with a second value for the scheduling parameter of the scheduling command (see paragraph 52: The “repetition transmission method information” may include the number of DCI-mapped resource units to which DCI is mapped, the number of times signals of the DCI-mapped resource units are repeatedly transmitted (the number of repetitions of signals of DCI-mapped resource units), the number of TB-mapped resource units to which TB is mapped, the number of times signals of the TB-mapped resource units are repeatedly transmitted (the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units), and information (e.g., a subframe number, a subframe number+a radio frame number, or a parameter to be inserted in a predetermined formula used to identify a subframe number and/or a radio frame number) indicating a subframe location at which the transmission of a physical downlink control channel is started; see paragraph 54: A part of the “repetition transmission method information” may be transmitted via DCI. For example, the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units may be included in DCI to enable dynamic control of the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units; see paragraph 55: Similarly, the number of repetitions of signals of DCI-mapped resource units may also be included in DCI to enable the user device UE successfully receiving the DCI to identify the number of repetitions; also, see figure 6B, reproduced below for convenience). PNG media_image2.png 270 592 media_image2.png Greyscale Examiner further notes that Takeda also discloses that the repetitions of the first and second TBs being mapped to non-overlapping time-domain resources and the repetitions of first and second TBs being mapped to a same physical resource block, PRB, set (see figure 6B and paragraphs 52-55). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of ZTE and combine it with the noted teachings of Takeda. The motivation to combine these references is to provide a method for repeating each resource of multiple resources a number of times indicated by a repetition number and to thereby achieve a coverage expansion in MTC (see paragraphs 17 and 18 of Takeda). Consider claims 8 and 21, ZTE discloses that the first transmission comprises a first number of repetitions of the first TB and the second transmission comprises a second number of repetitions of the second TB, the first number being different than the second number (see section 3). Consider claims 13 and 26, ZTE discloses skipping a repetition of at least one of the first and second TB (see section 3.2: early termination). Consider claim 14, ZTE discloses a method implemented in a wireless device, WD, configured to communicate with a network node (see figure 2, reproduced below for convenience), the method comprising: receiving a single downlink control information, DCI, message scheduling a first transmission with repetition of a first transport block, TB, and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB (see section 3: “multi-TBs scheduling with DCI for unicast”; also, see figures 2 and 3), the repetitions of the first and second TBs being mapped to non-overlapping time-domain resources and the repetitions of first and second TBs being mapped to a same physical resource block, PRB, set (see section 3: in figures 2 and 3, the TBs use the same frequencies, in contrast to figure 4 where frequency hopping is used); and processing the repetitions of the first TB and the repetitions of the second TB based at least in part on the single DCI scheduling (see section 3: “multi-TBs scheduling with DCI for unicast” and see figures 2 and 3). PNG media_image1.png 412 1062 media_image1.png Greyscale ZTE discloses a first transmission with repetition of the first TB and the second transmission with repetition of the second TB (see above). However, ZTE does not specifically disclose scheduling in one downlink control information, DCI, message a first transmission with a repetition of a first transport block and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB, and triggering via a scheduling command in the one DCI message to dynamically signal transmission of multiple transport blocks, the first TB associated with a first value for a scheduling parameter of the scheduling command, and the second TB associated with a second value for the scheduling parameter of the scheduling command. Takeda discloses scheduling in one downlink control information, DCI, message a first transmission with a repetition of a first transport block and a second transmission with repetition of a second TB, and triggering via a scheduling command in the one DCI message to dynamically signal transmission of multiple transport blocks, the first TB associated with a first value for a scheduling parameter of the scheduling command, and the second TB associated with a second value for the scheduling parameter of the scheduling command (see paragraph 52: The “repetition transmission method information” may include the number of DCI-mapped resource units to which DCI is mapped, the number of times signals of the DCI-mapped resource units are repeatedly transmitted (the number of repetitions of signals of DCI-mapped resource units), the number of TB-mapped resource units to which TB is mapped, the number of times signals of the TB-mapped resource units are repeatedly transmitted (the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units), and information (e.g., a subframe number, a subframe number+a radio frame number, or a parameter to be inserted in a predetermined formula used to identify a subframe number and/or a radio frame number) indicating a subframe location at which the transmission of a physical downlink control channel is started; see paragraph 54: A part of the “repetition transmission method information” may be transmitted via DCI. For example, the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units may be included in DCI to enable dynamic control of the number of repetitions of signals of TB-mapped resource units; see paragraph 55: Similarly, the number of repetitions of signals of DCI-mapped resource units may also be included in DCI to enable the user device UE successfully receiving the DCI to identify the number of repetitions; also, see figure 6B, reproduced below for convenience). PNG media_image2.png 270 592 media_image2.png Greyscale Examiner further notes that Takeda also discloses that the repetitions of the first and second TBs being mapped to non-overlapping time-domain resources and the repetitions of first and second TBs being mapped to a same physical resource block, PRB, set (see figure 6B and paragraphs 52-55). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of ZTE and combine it with the noted teachings of Takeda. The motivation to combine these references is to provide a method for repeating each resource of multiple resources a number of times indicated by a repetition number and to thereby achieve a coverage expansion in MTC (see paragraphs 17 and 18 of Takeda). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 49-52 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jamal Javaid whose telephone number is 571-270-5137 and email address is Jamal.Javaid@uspto.gov. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Jiang, can be reached on 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /JAMAL JAVAID/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Feb 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Feb 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640852
REDUCTION OF DUPLICATE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634800
BASE STATION ASSISTED INFORMATION CENTRIC NETWORK
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627407
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12615560
REFERENCE SELECTION FOR HANDOVER WITH PSCELL CHANGE OR ADDITION
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615558
COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 970 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month