Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/043,324

NOR-TYPE MEMORY DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING NOR-TYPE MEMORY DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING MEMORY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Priority
Mar 08, 2021 — CN 202110252927.4 +1 more
Examiner
PATERSON, BRIGITTE A
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chinese Academy of Sciences
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
291 granted / 380 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
407
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 380 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-11, 16, 19, 35-36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 2020/0176468 A1 (Herner). Re claims 1 and 35 and 36, Herner teaches a NOR-type memory device (memory structure 10), comprising: a plurality of device layers (active layers 310, 320 etc. including dielectric portions 140/130) disposed on a substrate, wherein each of the plurality of device layers comprises a stack of a first source/drain layer (source or drain layer 70), a first channel layer (semiconductor layers 120), and a second source/drain layer (source or drain layer 60) (Fig. 17); and a gate stack (gate stack including layers 200/210/220/240) that extends vertically with respect to the substrate to pass through the stack in the each of the plurality of device layers, wherein the gate stack comprises a gate conductor layer (gate layer 240) and a memory functional layer (charge storage layer 210) disposed between the gate conductor layer and the stack, and a memory cell is defined at an intersection of the gate stack and the stack, wherein the stack surrounds a periphery of the gate stack (the stack includes dielectric portions 140/130 therefore the entirety of the stack surrounds the gate stack)(Figs. 1-24); an electronic apparatus comprising the NOR-type memory device according to claim 1 (claim 35); wherein the electronic apparatus comprises a smart phone, a computer, a tablet, an artificial intelligence device, a wearable device, or a mobile power supply (claim 36)( Flash memory is used in computers). PNG media_image1.png 576 520 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 791 549 media_image2.png Greyscale Re claim 2, Herner teaches wherein the stack of at least one of the plurality of device layers further comprises a second channel layer and a third source/drain layer and two memory cells stacked with each other are defined at the intersection of the gate stack and the stack (the device layer stack making up 310 which are vertically stacked on device layer stack 320). Re claim 3, Herner teaches wherein the memory functional layer comprises at least one of a charge trapping material or a ferroelectric material (charge storage layer 210 [0033]). Re claim 4, Herner teaches wherein the stack comprises a single crystal semiconductor material ([0020] while Herner does not explicitly state that the semiconductor layers are single crystal Examiner takes Official Notice that single crystal semiconductor is used for deposited active layers in stacked 3D memory due to the reduced thickness of these layers, the deposition types listed). Re claim 5, Herner teaches wherein an isolation layer is disposed between at least one pair of adjacent device layers among the plurality of device layers (hard mask layer 30 [0020]). Re claim 6, Herner teaches wherein a bit line (bit lines are connected at the top of each of conductive material 400 Fig. 24) that is electrically connected to a source/drain layer adjacent to the isolation layer in a device layer above the isolation layer is different from a bit line that is electrically connected to a source/drain layer adjacent to the isolation layer in a device layer below the isolation layer. PNG media_image3.png 595 509 media_image3.png Greyscale Re claim 7, Herner teaches wherein the memory functional layer is formed on a bottom surface of the gate conductor layer and a sidewall of the gate conductor layer (charge storage layer 210 is formed conformally in the trenches thus meeting this relative requirement Fig. 18). PNG media_image2.png 791 549 media_image2.png Greyscale Re claim 8, Herner teaches wherein the NOR-type memory device comprises a plurality of gate stacks disposed in an array (Figs. 1-24). Re claim 9, Herner teaches wherein the first source/drain layer, the first channel layer, the second source/drain layer, the second channel layer, and the third source/drain layer comprise the same semiconductor material, wherein a doping concentration interface is provided between adjacent layers (Examiner takes official notice that enhancement mode field effect transistors of Herner are formed of NPN or PNP structures). Re claim 10, Herner teaches further comprising: a first bit line and a second bit line (separate bit lines are connected to the transistors in each vertical line of stacked memory FETs) that is different from the first bit line; a source line; a first contact portion to the first source/drain layer (vertical conductive portion 400); a second contact portion to the second source/drain layer (vertical conductive portion 400); and a third contact portion to the third source/drain layer (vertical conductive portion 400), wherein the first contact portion and the third contact portion are electrically connected to the first bit line and the second bit line respectively, and the second contact portion is electrically connected to the source line (NOR circuitry requires two transistors in each cell which share connection to the same bit line and the common source line and each string is connected to a different bit line to form the array [0037] Fig. 24). Re claim 11, Herner teaches further comprising: a fourth contact portion (portion of channel layers 120 in contact with layer 60. The claim language merely requires a portion of something in contact with the channel layers.) to the first channel layer; and a fifth contact portion to the second channel layer. Re claim 16, Herner teaches wherein the substrate comprises a device region and a contact region adjacent to the device region, the memory cell is formed on the device region, and the contact portions are formed on the contact region (Fig. 24). Re claim 19, Herner teaches further comprising: a word line; and a sixth contact portion to the gate conductor layer, wherein the sixth contact portion is electrically connected to the word line (word lines 230 Fig. 18). PNG media_image2.png 791 549 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 17 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Herner does not teach a conductive structure in the staircase contact region which individually contacts the first and second channel layers directly. The first and second channels are controlled by the gate stacks which are connected to the word lines 230 underneath the memory stack. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIGITTE A PATERSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1752. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kraig can be reached at 571-272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRIGITTE A. PATERSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2896 /BRIGITTE A PATERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 20, 2026
Response Filed
May 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12652869
GERMANIUM-SILICON LIGHT SENSING APPARATUS II
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12628350
MANGANESE OR SCANDIUM DOPED FERROELECTRIC DEVICE AND BIT-CELL
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622010
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616998
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF WAFER LEVEL ULTRASONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12615848
ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE PROTECTION STRUCTURE AND CHIP
3y 3m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 380 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month