Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/044,046

Method for Producing a Semiconductor Body and Semicondcutor Arrangement

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Examiner
JAHAN, BILKIS
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Ams-Osram International GMBH
OA Round
2 (Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
788 granted / 892 resolved
+20.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.3%
+11.3% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 892 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Attorney Docket Number: OSR-847-HQ Filling Date: 03/03/2023 Priority Date: 10/29/21 Inventor: Stauss et al Examiner: Bilkis Jahan DETAILED ACTION In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Objections Claim 43 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 43 in last line recites “the first layer”. However, it should be “the first doped layer”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 43 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wierer et al (WO 2010/112980 A1, the document is attached). Regarding claim 43, Wierer discloses a semiconductor arrangement (Figs. 1-4, Paras. 21-42) comprising: a carrier substrate 10 (Para. 21); a first doped layer 12, 14 arranged on the carrier substrate 10 and having at least one first region 54; a second layer 36 arranged on the first doped layer 12, 14; and a functional semiconductor layer sequence 12, 54 arranged on the second layer 36 (on the lower surface), wherein the at least one first region 54 of the first doped layer 12, 14 comprises a porosified semiconductor material 54 having a degree of porosity of at least 20% by volume (Paras. 21-23), wherein the functional semiconductor layer sequence 12, 54 has at least one trench 54 which separates regions of the functional semiconductor layer 12 sequence from one another, and wherein each of these regions 12 (portion between 54) is arranged over a second region 12 (bottom portion) of the first layer 12, 14. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 22-29, 32-41 and 44-45 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 43 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BILKIS JAHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5022. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 am-5 Pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marlon T Fletcher can be reached at (571)272-2063. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BILKIS . JAHAN Primary Examiner Art Unit 2817 /BILKIS JAHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 07, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598842
Light Emitting Display Panel
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581834
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581772
STRAIN BALANCED DIRECT BANDGAP ALUMINUM INDIUM PHOSPHIDE QUANTUM WELLS FOR LIGHT EMITTING DIODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581764
BOND STRUCTURE HAVING SHIELDING STRUCTURES FOR STACKED IC CHIPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563869
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE DEVICE AND LIGHT EMITTING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 892 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month