Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/058,006

Harvested Reconstitution Bumping

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 22, 2022
Priority
Jan 28, 2022 — provisional 63/304,535
Examiner
MULERO FLORES, ERIC MANUEL
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
57 granted / 66 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
99
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
91.2%
+51.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 66 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/7/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendments filed 4/7/2026 have been entered and considered. The amendments to claims 5-6 and 24 and the added new claims 28-29 are acknowledged. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 5 and 24 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 5-6, 15-16, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau et al US 20220336333 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Lau), in view of Lin US 20090212441 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Lin). Regarding claim 5, Lau teaches, A composite contact bump structure (“package structure 100b” para. 0067 FIG. 1Z) comprising: a metal wiring layer (“first redistribution circuit 125” para. 0041); a first seed layer (“seed material S22”, para. 0046) on the metal wiring layer; a first metal stud (The portion of the “metal layer M22” in the “third opening 132” can be considered the metal stud, para. 0043, 0046) and a first routing line protruding from the first seed layer, wherein the first routing line is integrally formed with the first metal stud (leftward extending portion of “metal layer M22” on “dielectric layer 130” is considered a routing line); a first passivation layer (“third dielectric layer 140” para. 0047 FIG. 1P and 1Z), wherein the first passivation layer laterally surrounds the first seed layer and the first metal stud, wherein the first seed layer does not laterally surround the first metal stud within the first passivation layer (sidewall of the “seed material S22” is coplanar with “metal layer M22” due to the photoresist removal process shown in FIG. 1N-1O, para. 0046); a planarized surface formed of the first passivation layer and the first metal stud (“second upper surface 141” of the “third dielectric layer 140” is aligned with the “second surface 137” of the “second redistribution circuit 135”, para. 0062), wherein the planarized surface does not include the first seed layer (“seed material S22” is under the “metal layer M22” and not aligned with “second upper surface 141” and “second surface 137”); a second passivation layer (“fourth dielectric layer 170” para. 0067) over the first passivation layer; an opening (“fourth opening 172” para. 0050 FIG. 1R) in the second passivation layer; a second seed layer (“seed layer S33” para. 0052 FIG. 1S) on the second passivation layer, within the opening in the second passivation layer and over the first metal stud (“seed layer S33” is formed within “fourth opening 172” and in contact with “second surface 157” of the metal layer, para. 0051-0052); and a second metal stud (“metal layer M33” para. 0052 FIG. 1S) on the second seed layer within the opening in the second passivation layer (a portion of “metal layer M33” is formed on the “seed layer S33” within the “fourth opening 172”). However, Lau fails to teach a first silicon nitride barrier layer that laterally surrounds the first seed layer and the first metal stud, wherein the first seed layer laterally surrounds the first metal stud within the first silicon nitride barrier layer, the first passivation layer on the first silicon nitride barrier layer. Nevertheless, Lin teaches a “passivation layer 34” with “vias 36 and 38” formed therein (para. 0019 FIG. 2A). “Conductive layer 40” is formed on “passivation layer 34” and in “vias 36 and 38” and “passivation layer 42” is formed thereon, analogous to the “seed material S22” and “metal layer M22” formed on “second dielectric layer 130” and in “third opening 132” and the “third dielectric layer 140” formed thereon in Lau. “Second dielectric layer 130” in Lau can be a photosensitive dielectric material but this is taught only as an example material (para. 0042). “Passivation layer 34” in Lin can be SiN, polyimide, epoxy-based photosensitive polymer, or other insulating materials that provide structural support and isolation (para. 0019). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that SiN is a material suitable for use as an insulating layer that provides support to the device and isolates conductors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau with the first silicon nitride barrier layer taught in Lin. Similar to a photosensitive dielectric, silicon nitride is a material suitable for use as an insulator that isolates conductors and provides structural support. Regarding claim 6, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5, further comprising a solder material (“solder ball 195” para. 0060) on top of the second metal stud. However, Lau, modified by Lin, fail to expressly teach wherein the first passivation layer is formed of a nitride or polymer material. Nevertheless, Lin teaches “passivation layer 42” formed over “passivation layer 34” and “conductive layer 40” (para. 0021), analogous to “third dielectric layer 140” formed on “second dielectric layer 130” and “metal layer M22” in Lau. “Third dielectric layer 140” in Lau can be a photosensitive dielectric material but this is taught only as an example material (para. 0047). “Passivation layer 42” in Lin can be SiN, polyimide, epoxy-based photosensitive polymer, or other insulating materials that provide structural support and isolation (para. 0021). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that SiN is a material suitable for use as an insulating layer that provides support to the device and isolates conductors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau with the first passivation layer material taught in Lin. Similar to a photosensitive dielectric, silicon nitride is a material suitable for use as an insulator that isolates conductors and provides structural support. Regarding claim 15, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5, wherein the second metal stud protrudes away from the second passivation layer (“seed layer S33” and “metal layer M33” protrude away from “surface 171” of the “fourth dielectric layer 170”, para. 0067). Regarding claim 16, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches composite contact bump structure of claim 5, wherein the second metal stud and the first metal stud are formed of a same metal (based on the shadings of the “metal layer M22” and “metal layer M33”, the examiner understands they are the same material). Regarding claim 22, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5, further comprising a redistribution layer (“second redistribution layer RDL22” para. 0049) between the first metal stud and the second metal stud. Regarding claim 23, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 22, wherein the second metal stud is connected to the first metal stud through a wiring trace in the redistribution layer (The portion of the “metal layer M22” in the “third opening 132” is electrically connected to “metal layer M33” through the “second redistribution layer RDL22”). Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau, modified by Lin, as applied to claim 6 in view of Yu et al. US 20210358854 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Yu) and Bezama et al. US 20110147922 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Bezama). Regarding claim 7, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 6 but fails to teach wherein the solder material is a C4 bump on top of the second metal stud. Nevertheless, Yu teaches “Die connectors 66A and 66B” electrically connected to “under-bump metallizations (UBMs) 130” and “conductive connectors 132” formed on “under-bump metallizations (UBMs) 130” (para. 0056, 0086 FIG. 14). The “conductive connectors 132” bond to a “substrate core 302” (para. 0103 FIG. 14). As further taught in Bezama et al. US 20110147922 A1, C4 bumps are common interconnect structures between devices (Bezama para. 0002). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that solder C4 bumps are known for connecting electronic devices. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the composite contact bump structure of Lau, modified by Lin, with the C4 bump taught between Yu and Bezama. C4 bumps are known alternatives for interconnecting electronic devices. Regarding claim 8, Lau, modified by Lin, Yu, and Bezama, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 7, wherein the C4 bump is thicker than a thickness of the second metal stud protruding away from the second passivation layer (as suggested in FIG. 9 and 13, the thickness of "conductive connector 132" is greater than the thickness of "UBM 130" that protrudes past "insulating layer 128"). Regarding claim 9, Lau, modified by Lin, Yu, and Bezama, teaches 9 the composite contact bump structure of claim 7, wherein the second metal stud is wider than the first metal stud (The portion of the “metal layer M22” in the “third opening 132” has a narrower width than “metal layer M33”). Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau, modified by Lin, as applied to claim 5 above, in view of Ohsumi US 20040201097 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Ohsumi). Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5 but fails to teach wherein a center point of the second metal stud is offset from a center point of the first metal stud by at least a half maximum width of the second metal stud. Nevertheless, Ohsumi teaches wherein a center point of the second metal stud (center point of “columnar electrode 117”, para. 0088 FIG. 9) is offset from a center point of the first metal stud (center point of “metal wiring layer 111” para. 0088 FIG. 9) by at least a half maximum width of the second metal stud (FIG. 9 suggests that “columnar electrode 117” is shifted from the center point of “metal wiring layer 111” more than at least a half width of “columnar electrode 117”). Lau, modified by Lin, and Ohsumi teach interconnect structures with multiple metal layers. Ohsumi has the “columnar electrode 117” shifted by the “metal wiring layer 111” so that the pitch of a plurality of the “columnar electrodes 117” can be made greater than the pitch of the “electrode pads 109” of “semiconductor substrate 107” (para. 0076). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that shifting the centers of “metal layer 464” and “copper layer 37” can be done so that the pitch of the “metal layer 464” is more relaxed. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the composite contact bump structure taught between Lau and Lin with the offset between first and second metal studs as taught in Ohsumi. Shifting the second metal studs allows for manipulation of the pitch. Claims 20-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau, modified by Lin, as applied to claim 5 above, in view of Baek et al. US 20180053732 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Baek). Regarding claim 20, Lau, modified by Lin, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5 but fails to teach wherein the routing line connects to a second first metal stud. Nevertheless, Baek teaches wherein the routing line (“redistribution layer 142” para. 0081 FIG. 13) connects to a second first metal stud (“via 143” under “first redistribution layer 112a”, FIG. 13). Lau, modified by Lin, and Baek teach interconnect structures with multiple metal layers. The “second connection member 140” comprises “redistribution layers 142” and “vias 143” that are connected to each other and may consist of the same material (para. 0096 and 0098-0099). The “vias 143” and “redistribution layers 142” are connected to the “connection pads 122” of the “semiconductor chip 120” (para. 0093, 0099 FIG. 13). The “vias 143” are in contact with the “first redistribution layer 112a” of the “first connection member 110” (para. 0088) that connects to the “interposer substrate 210” and the memory package containing “memory 240” (para. 0107 FIG. 13). “Redistribution layer 142” also connects with the “under-bump metal layer 160” (para. 0101). As such, the “via 143” under “first redistribution layer 112a” and “redistribution layer 142” interconnect “semiconductor chip 120” with multiple devices. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that the “via 143” further connected to “redistribution layer 142” would allow multiple components to be connected to the “semiconductor chip 120”. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau with the second first metal stud as taught in Baek. The second metal stud connected to the routing line further distributes signal to more components, increasing the device integration within the same package. Regarding claim 21, Lau, modified by Lin and Baek, teaches the composite contact bump structure of claim 5, wherein the second passivation layer (“passivation layer 150” para. 0100 FIG. 13) spans over the routing line (“passivation layer 150” covers portions of “redistribution layer 142” except where “under-bump metal layer 160”, the second metal stud, is formed, para. 0101). Claims 24, 26, and 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau et al US 20220336333 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Lau), in view of Lin US 20090212441 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Lin), in view of Yu et al US 20210358854 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Yu). Regarding claim 24, Lau teaches (Currently amended) An electronic package (“package structure 100b” para. 0067 FIG. 2) comprising: a first die (structure from “first lower surface 113” to “solder ball 195”, para. 0054, 0060 FIG. 1Z) embedded in a molding compound layer (“molding compound 190” para. 0058), the first die comprising: a metal wiring layer (“first redistribution circuit 125” para. 0041); a first seed layer (“seed material S22”, para. 0046) on the metal wiring layer; a first metal stud (The portion of the “metal layer M22” in the “third opening 132” can be considered the metal stud, para. 0043, 0046.) and a first routing line protruding from the first seed layer, wherein the first routing line is integrally formed with the first metal stud (leftward extending portion of “metal layer M22” on “dielectric layer 130” is considered a routing line); a first passivation layer (“third dielectric layer 140” para. 0047 FIG. 1P and 1Z), wherein the first passivation layer laterally surrounds the first seed layer and the first metal stud, wherein the first seed layer does not laterally surround the first metal stud within the first passivation layer (sidewall of the “seed material S22” is coplanar with “metal layer M22” due to the photoresist removal process shown in FIG. 1N-1O, para. 0046); a planarized surface formed of the first passivation layer and the first metal stud (“second upper surface 141” of the “third dielectric layer 140” is aligned with the “second surface 137” of the “second redistribution circuit 135”, para. 0062), wherein the planarized surface does not include the first seed layer (“seed material S22” is under the “metal layer M22” and not aligned with “second upper surface 141” and “second surface 137”); a second passivation layer (“fourth dielectric layer 170” para. 0067) over the first passivation layer an opening in the second passivation layer (“fourth opening 172” para. 0050 FIG. 1R); a second seed layer (“seed layer S33” para. 0052 FIG. 1S) on the second passivation layer, within the opening in the second passivation layer and on the first metal stud (“seed layer S33” is formed within “fourth opening 172” and in contact with “second surface 157” of the metal layer, para. 0051-0052); and a second metal stud (“metal layer M33” para. 0052 FIG. 1S) on the second seed layer within the opening in the second passivation layer (a portion of “metal layer M33” is formed on the “seed layer S33” within the “fourth opening 172”). However, Lau fails to teach a first silicon nitride barrier layer that laterally surrounds the first seed layer and the first metal stud, wherein the first seed layer laterally surrounds the first metal stud within the first silicon nitride barrier layer, the first passivation layer on the first silicon nitride barrier layer, a planarized surface formed of the first passivation layer, the first metal stud, and the molding compound layer, the second passivation layer spanning over the molding compound layer. Nevertheless, Lin teaches a “passivation layer 34” with “vias 36 and 38” formed therein (para. 0019 FIG. 2A). “Conductive layer 40” is formed on “passivation layer 34” and in “vias 36 and 38” and “passivation layer 42” is formed thereon, analogous to the “seed material S22” and “metal layer M22” formed on “second dielectric layer 130” and in “third opening 132” and the “third dielectric layer 140” formed thereon in Lau. “Second dielectric layer 130” in Lau can be a photosensitive dielectric material but this is taught only as an example material (para. 0042). “Passivation layer 34” in Lin can be SiN, polyimide, epoxy-based photosensitive polymer, or other insulating materials that provide structural support and isolation (para. 0019). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that SiN is a material suitable for use as an insulating layer that provides support to the device and isolates conductors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau with the first silicon nitride barrier layer taught in Lin. Similar to a photosensitive dielectric, silicon nitride is a material suitable for use as an insulator that isolates conductors and provides structural support. However, Lau, modified by Lin, fails to teach a planarized surface formed of the first passivation layer, the first metal stud, and the molding compound layer, the second passivation layer spanning over the molding compound layer. Nevertheless, Yu teaches a planarized surface formed of the first passivation layer, the first metal stud, and the molding compound layer (top surfaces of "insulating layer 68", “encapsulant 112”, and "die connectors 66A, 66B" are coplanar, para. 0073 FIG. 8-9 and 14), the second passivation layer ("insulating layers 116, 120, 124, and 128" para. 0074 FIG. 9 and 14) spanning over the molding compound layer ("insulating layers 116, 120, 124, and 128" is over "insulating layer 68" and "encapsulant 112"). Lau, modified by Lin, and Yu teach packages with multilevel interconnections. The package in Lau comprises a single die having a first metal stud “metal layer M22” connected to a second metal stud “metal layer M33” connected through “second redistribution layer RDL22”. Meanwhile, the package in Yu features a plurality of “integrated circuit die 10 and 20” having first metal studs “Die connectors 66A and 66B” connected to second metal studs “UBMs 130” through a “redistribution structure 114” (para. 0056, 0061, 0085). The “encapsulant 112” surrounds and protects both “integrated circuit die 10 and 20” (para. 0072). “Redistribution structure 114” interconnects “die connectors 66A and 66B” with each other and to “substrate core 302” and “package components 200” (para. 0092, 0103). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that multiple die can be integrated into a same package by coupling their “die connectors 66A and 66B” to a same “redistribution structure 114”. The die can be protected by surrounding them with “encapsulant 112” before forming “redistribution structure 114”. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the electronic package taught between Lau and Lin with the additional components taught in Yu. Instead of a single component, a plurality of components having first metal studs can be integrated into the electronic package by surrounding them in molding compounds and forming a common redistribution structure on their first metal studs. Regarding claim 26, Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, teaches the electronic package of claim 24, further comprising a second die (“integrated circuit die 20” para. 0074) embedded within the molding compound layer, and a redistribution layer (“redistribution structure 114” para. 0074 FIG. 9) spanning over the first die, the second die, and the molding compound layer, wherein the redistribution layer includes a die-to-die routing (“trace 118B” that extends from “die 10” to “die 20”, para. 0076 FIG. 9) connecting another metal stud on the metal wiring layer of the first die to the second die (FIG. 9 shows a “trace 118B” contacting a “die connector 66A, 66B” in “die 10” and a “die connector 66A, 66B” in “die 20”). Regarding claim 28, Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, teach the electronic package of claim 24 but fail to expressly teach wherein the first passivation layer is formed of a nitride or polymer material. Nevertheless, Lin teaches “passivation layer 42” formed over “passivation layer 34” and “conductive layer 40” (para. 0021), analogous to “third dielectric layer 140” formed on “second dielectric layer 130” and “metal layer M22” in Lau. “Third dielectric layer 140” in Lau can be a photosensitive dielectric material but this is taught only as an example material (para. 0047). “Passivation layer 42” in Lin can be SiN, polyimide, epoxy-based photosensitive polymer, or other insulating materials that provide structural support and isolation (para. 0021). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that SiN is a material suitable for use as an insulating layer that provides support to the device and isolates conductors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau, Lin, and Yu with the first passivation layer material taught in Lin. Similar to a photosensitive dielectric, silicon nitride is a material suitable for use as an insulator that isolates conductors and provides structural support. Regarding claim 29, Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, teach the electronic package of claim 24 but fail to expressly teach wherein the first passivation layer is formed of polyimide. Nevertheless, Lin teaches “passivation layer 42” formed over “passivation layer 34” and “conductive layer 40” (para. 0021), analogous to “third dielectric layer 140” formed on “second dielectric layer 130” and “metal layer M22” in Lau. “Third dielectric layer 140” in Lau can be a photosensitive dielectric material but this is taught only as an example material (para. 0047). “Passivation layer 42” in Lin can be SiN, polyimide, epoxy-based photosensitive polymer, or other insulating materials that provide structural support and isolation (para. 0021). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that polyimide is a material suitable for use as an insulating layer that provides support to the device and isolates conductors. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to further modify the composite contact bump structure in Lau, Lin, and Yu with the first passivation layer material taught in Lin. Similar to a photosensitive dielectric, polyimide is a material suitable for use as an insulator that isolates conductors and provides structural support. Claim 25 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, as applied to claim 24, in view of Lim et al. US 20110095418 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Lim). Lau, modified by Lin and Yu teaches the electronic package of claim 24 but fails to teach further comprising a dummy second metal stud over the first die, wherein the dummy second metal stud is not electrically connected to the first die. Nevertheless, Lim teaches further comprising a dummy second metal stud (“bump 132” para. 0087 FIG. 1B) over the first die (“semiconductor chip 150” para. 0087 FIG. 1A-1B), wherein the dummy second metal stud is not electrically connected to the first die (“bump 132” is not connected to “enter chip pad 161”, para. 0087). Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, and Lim teach external interconnection structures. The “semiconductor chip 150” includes dummy bumps such as “bump 132” to physical support “semiconductor chip 150” on the “package substrate 110”. Meanwhile, “bumps 131 and 141” are the ones that provide a signal path for the “semiconductor chip 150” (para. 0087-0088). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that extra bumps electrically disconnected from “semiconductor chip 150” can serve to physically support the chip on a substrate. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the electronic package taught between Lau, Lin, and Yu with the dummy second metal stud taught in Lim. Dummy second metal studs can help physically support the die. Claim 27 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, as applied to claim 24, in view of Gong et al. US 20180233462 A1 (hereinafter referred to as Gong). Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, teaches the electronic package of claim 24, further comprising a redistribution layer (“second redistribution layer RDL22” Lau para. 0049 FIG. 2 and “redistribution structure 114” in Yu para. 0074) between the first metal stud and the second metal stud. However, Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, fails to teach a seal ring structure within the redistribution layer. Nevertheless, Gong teaches a seal ring structure (“seal ring 150” para. 0020 FIG. 1-2) within the redistribution layer (“RDL 220” para. 0020 FIG. 2). Lau, modified by Lin and Yu, and Gong teach interconnect structures on semiconductor chips. The “RDL 220” includes the “seal ring 150” as a grounding path (para. 0023) and as protection against cracking and delamination of “RDL 220” (para. 0025). One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have recognized that “seal ring 150” can be implemented in the redistribution layer taught between Lau and Yu for electric and physical protection. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the electronic package taught between Lau, Lin, and Yu with the ring seal structure taught in Gong. The ring seal structure protects the redistribution layer from delamination and cracking while also serving as a ground path. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERIC MULERO FLORES whose telephone number is (571)270-0070. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-5pm (typically). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio Maldonado can be reached at (571)272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC MANUEL MULERO FLORES/Examiner, Art Unit 2898 /JULIO J MALDONADO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jul 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Oct 09, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 09, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 07, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677562
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677527
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF THE LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677698
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12660330
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 12m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12635196
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 12m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.2%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 66 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month