Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/064,170

MULTIPLE PROCESSES SHARING GPU MEMORY OBJECTS

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 09, 2022
Examiner
KE, PENG
Art Unit
2194
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ati Technologies Ulc
OA Round
3 (Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
111 granted / 216 resolved
-3.6% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
86.3%
+46.3% vs TC avg
§102
5.3%
-34.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 216 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detail Information On 11/19/2025, the Remarks was filed with claims 1-20. This is a Second Non-Final Action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liu US Publication 2022/0318565. 18/064,170 Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 Claim 1 An apparatus comprising: circuitry configured to: Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; create a plurality of instances of an application to be executed by a processor; Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; Detect a function call of the application within a first instance of plurality of instances, and Liu p0038-p0070; Search for sharable data objects to be used by the processor when executing the function call of the first instance. Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0038-p0070; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; As per claims 8 and 15, they are rejected under the same rationale as claim 1. See rejection above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565. 18/064,170 Tesse US 2023/0027817 in view of Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 Claim 1 An apparatus comprising: circuitry configured to: create a plurality of instances of an application to be executed by a processor; Tesse p0157-p0168; Liu teaches manages a plurality of instance of a single application with in a computer environment; Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0038-p0070; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include Liu’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to provider user with ability to deploy multiple instance of the same inference application to satisfy real-time requirement of inference application. detect a function call of the application within a first instance of the plurality of instances; and Tesse p0171-p0187; each method is a function call. It is noted that the hash function is apply to the mapping module. See Tesse p0202-0210; search for shareable data objects to be used by the processor when executing the function call of the first instance. p0200-0210; Claim 2 The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the circuitry is further configured to search for shareable data objects to be used by the processor when executing the first instance of the function call, in further response to determining one or more of: a data object used by the function call is a non-writeable data object; and a size of the data object used by the function call is greater than a size threshold. See Liu teaches ROM p0079-p0083; See Tesse p0202-p0210; Tesse teaches threshold size. See Tesse p0075; Claim 3 The apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the circuitry is further configured to free data storage allocated for the first instance to be used for storing a first data object, in response to determining the first data object is already shared by one or more instances of the plurality of instances of the application being executed by the processor. See Liu Fig. 10, p0065-p0079 See Tesse p0200 See Tesse p0205-p0207; As per claims 8 and 9, they are rejected under the same rationale as claims 1 and 2. See rejection above. As per claims 15 and 16, they are rejected under the same rationale as claims 1 and 2. See rejection above. 18/064,170 Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 Claim 10 The method as recited in claim 8, further comprising freeing, by the first processor, data storage allocated for the first instance to be used for storing a first data object, in response to determining the first data object is already shared by one or more instances of the plurality of instances of the application being executed by the second processor. Liu teaches determine particular object is already shared by one or more instance of multiple instances being executed by the second processor. Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0038-p0070; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; As per claim 17, it is rejected under the same rationale as claim 10. See rejection above. Claims 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 and White US 5,603,031 18/064,170 Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 and White US 5,603,031 Claim 4 The apparatus as recited in claim 3, wherein the circuitry is further configured to: translate a first identifier of a first type of the first data object to a second identifier of a second type; and search, using the second identifier, a table storing one or more mappings between identifiers of the second type and pointers identifying memory locations that store data objects in address ranges of the plurality of instances of the application. Tesse teaches PTP method of identifies address that can used to route the message. Tesse p0175 White teaches translate first identifier to second identifier; c78:38-50 and search based on different identifier; c88:45-65; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include White’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to provider user with related search result. Claims 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565, White US 5,603,031 and Chinthekindi US Patent 10,628,298. 18/064,170 Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565, White US 5,603,031 and Chinthekindi US Patent 10,628,298 Claim 5 The apparatus as recited in claim 4, wherein the circuitry is further configured to generate the second identifier by performing a hash function using at least the first identifier. Chinthekindi teaches generate second structure that contain identifier that has generating hashes of the unique identifiers of the data objects. See Chinthekindi c16:5-20; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include Chinthekindi’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to provider user with related search result. Claim 6 The apparatus as recited in claim 4, wherein the circuitry is further configured to maintain data storage allocated for the first instance to be used for storing a second data object, in response to determining the second data object is not already shared by one or more instances of the plurality of instances of the application being executed by the processor. Chinthekindi teaches share data on data-center and as a single point of access. See Chinthekindi c10:20-32; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include Chinthekindi’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to provide user with cloud service of their database. Claim 7 The apparatus as recited in claim 6, wherein the circuitry is further configured to: store a copy of the second data object in a particular memory location of data storage allocated for the first instance; and store, in the table, a mapping between an identifier of the second type of the second data object and the particular memory location. Tesse p0175 White c78:38-50; c88:45-65; Chinthekindi c10:20-32; Claims 11-14 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tess US 2023/0027817 in view Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 and White US 5,603,031. 18/064,170 Tess US 2023/0027817 in view of Liu US Publication 2022/0318565 and White US 5,603,031 Claim 11 The method as recited in claim 10, further comprising: translating, by the first processor, a first identifier of a first type of the first data object to a second identifier of a second type; and searching, by the first processor using the second identifier, a table storing one or more mappings between identifiers of the second type and pointers identifying memory locations that store data objects in address ranges of the plurality of instances of the application. Tesse teaches PTP method of identifies address that can used to route the message. Tesse p0175 White teaches translate first identifier to second identifier; c78:38-50 and search based on different identifier; c88:45-65; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include White’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to provider user with related search result. Claim 12 The method as recited in claim 11, further comprising generating, by the first processor, the second identifier by performing a hash function using at least the first identifier. White teaches translate first identifier to second identifier; c78:38-50 and search based on different identifier; c88:45-65; Claim 13 The method as recited in claim 11, further comprising maintaining, by the first processor, data storage allocated for the first instance to be used for storing a second data object, in response to determining the second data object is not already shared by one or more instances of the plurality of instances of the application being executed by the second processor. Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0038-p0070; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083; It would have been obvious at the time of the invention for a person ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) to include Liu’s teaching with Tesse’s method in order to reduce the amount of memory allocated by multiple instances. Claim 14 The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising: storing, by the first processor, a copy of the second data object in a particular memory location of data storage allocated for the first instance; and storing, by the first processor in the table, a mapping between an identifier of the second type of the second data object and the particular memory location. Tesse p0175 White c78:38-50; c88:45-65; Liu Fig. 12, Fig. 14; p0038-p0070; p0071-p0076; p0078-p0083;; As per claims 18-20, they are rejected under the same rationale as claims 11, and 13-14. See rejections above. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PENG KE whose telephone number is (571)272-4062. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Young can be reached at (571) 270-3180. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PENG KE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2194 /PENG KE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2194
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639136
USER INTERACTION EVENT STREAMING
3y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12619355
MACHINE LEARNING DATABASE MEMORY USE PREDICTION AND ADAPTATION
3y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12613748
VEHICULAR COMPUTATIONAL TASK ALLOCATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12596493
TECHNIQUES FOR DETERMINING A MINIMUM HARDWARE CONFIGURATION USING PERFORMANCE HEADROOM METRICS
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585492
MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+24.6%)
4y 10m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 216 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month