Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/064,517

SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE SUBSTRATE, SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE SUBSTRATE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 12, 2022
Priority
Apr 05, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0042147
Examiner
ARROYO, TERESA M
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Haesung Ds Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
357 granted / 497 resolved
+3.8% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
539
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
79.5%
+39.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 6-15 is / are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10/27/25. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 2/6/26, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-3 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 USC 112. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, both “a metal catalyst layer arranged so as to continuously surround a top surface, a bottom surface, and a side surface of each of the die pad portions and the lead portion” and “a graphene layer arranged so as to continuously surround the top surface, the bottom surface, and the side surface of each of the die pad portions and the lead portion” must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-3 is / are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for a graphene layer on a metal catalyst layer, does not reasonably provide enablement for both “a metal catalyst layer arranged so as to continuously surround a top surface, a bottom surface, and a side surface of each of the die pad portions and the lead portion” and “a graphene layer arranged so as to continuously surround the top surface, the bottom surface, and the side surface of each of the die pad portions and the lead portion.” The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and / or use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. The metal catalyst layer appears to be an intermediate layer so that the graphene layer is not directly on the die pad and the lead. The catalyst layer is on top, bottom, and sides of the die pad and lead. The graphene layer is on top, bottom and sides of the catalyst layer. The other claims are rejected as being dependent on claim 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-3 is / are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Amended claim 1 recites: “arranged so as to continuously surround…” This is unclear as to what is meant by surround: fully conformal; uninterrupted coating; complete enclosure; microscopic discontinuities allowed? “wherein a purity of the metal catalyst is greater than a purity of the base substrate”. This is unclear as to what is meant by purity: purity measured how; atomic purity; weight %; elemental purity; metallurgical purity? Claim 1 recites the limitation "each of the die pad portions" in lines 5 and 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The other claims are rejected as being dependent on claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2019/035353 teaches a substrate including a catalyst and / or graphene. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERESA M ARROYO whose telephone number is (703)756-1576. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday (8:30 A.M. E.T. - 5:00 P.M. E.T.). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sue Purvis can be reached at 571.272.1236. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERESA M. ARROYO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 06, 2026
Response Filed
May 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666984
SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653038
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12648228
ELECTRONIC CHIPS WITH SURFACE MOUNT COMPONENT
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12648215
METHOD FOR FABRICATING A SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12635276
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGES WITH RELIABLE COVERS
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+23.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month