Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/067,310

BIODEGRADABLE UREA-FORMALDEHYDE-BASED SAND-FIXING POLYMER MATERIAL WITH SLOW NUTRIENT RELEASE AND WATER ABSORPTION AND RETENTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 16, 2022
Examiner
TADAYYON ESLAMI, TABASSOM
Art Unit
1718
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Shanxi Zhongbei New Material Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
384 granted / 776 resolved
-15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
841
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 776 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-2, and 10 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected 09/09/25, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 09/09/25. Applicant’s election without traverse of group II, and group III in the reply filed on 09/09/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olof Sunden (Norwegian Patent: 148269 here after Sunden). Claim 3 is rejected. Sunder teaches a method for preparing a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing (soil improvement) polymer material with water absorption and retention(swelling) [page 2 lines 16-27, page 9 last paragraph lines 8-10], the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material comprising: a biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite with slow nutrient release and water absorption and retention; and a biodegradable polymer fabric (paper or fiber network); the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite being coated on a surface of the biodegradable polymer fabric, and being embedded in meshes of the biodegradable polymer fabric [page 2 lines 23-27; which in fact there being intermolecular hydrogen-bond interaction (chemical bond) between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer [page 2 last paragraph]; the method comprising: coating the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer (UF resin) composite on the surface of the biodegradable polymer fiber (cellulose stock, cellulose fibers) followed by thermal curing of the (biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer) composite on the surface of the biodegradable polymer fiber(cellulose), rolling and drying [page 7 lines 5-15, page 5 paragraph 5], to obtain the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based sand-fixing polymer material [page 9 last paragraph]. Although Sunder does not clearly teach the polymer material is slow nutrient release, however because there is hydrogen-bond interaction between the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite and the biodegradable polymer (cellulose)[page 4 lines 19-23], it contributing to a better nutrient slow-release property. Sunden teaches the coating UF based polymer composite on biodegradable polymer fibers or fiber stock(cellulose), and not on a fabric. However, it is obvious to use cellulose fibers as paper (pieces of polymer fabric) to be coated with UF resin in absence of criticality. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Sunden and mix pieces of cellulose paper with UF resin (to be coated on it), because an ordinary skill in art can use plurality of fibers in form of fabric (or paper) rather than individual fibers in absence of criticality. Claim 4 is rejected. Sunder does not teach a coating mass of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on cellulose paper (biodegradable fabric); however, it is to the skill of an ordinary skill to optimize it with concentration of fibers in mixture, viscosity of mixture and pressure of the rollers. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Sunden where coating mass of the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite on the biodegradable polymer fabric is 0.1-0.5 g/cm2, because it is to skill of an ordinary skill in art to optimize it in absence of criticality. Claim 5 is rejected. Sunder teaches a pressure of the rolling is 4.9 MPa (50 Kp/cm2) [page 5 paragraph 5]. Although Sunder does not teach the speed of the rollers, however teaches drying with rollers [page 15 lines 7-10]. Therefor the rolling speed of the drying rollers are result effective variable and has to be optimized. If the rollers speed is very fast, the drying may not happens completely and slow rotating the rollers causes long drying time which is not economically desirable. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Sunden where the speed of the rolling is 10-50 rpm, because it is a result effective variable and has to be optimized. Claim 6 is rejected as Sunder teaches the thermal curing is performed at below 60C including claimed (45-60C) range for 2 hours [page 6 paragraph 3]; and a temperature of the drying is 60°C [page 6 paragraph 3]. Claims 7-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olof Sunden (Norwegian Patent: 148269 here after Sunden), further in view of Yaqing Liu et al (U. S. Patent Application: 2019/0031574, here after Liu). Claims 7-9 are rejected. Sunder does not teach adjusting pH of formaldehyde and urea to 8. Liu teaches a method of making a water-absorbing and slow/controlled release fertilizer, a water-absorbing and water-retaining multi-nutrient biodegradable polymeric slow/controlled release fertilizer by reacting urea and formaldehyde and treat cellulose with it[abstract], and teaches adding formaldehyde and urea into a reaction vessel(reactor), followed by adjustment to pH=8 and reaction at a first preset temperature(40C) for a first preset time(2Hr); and adding an inorganic fertilizer containing phosphorus and potassium, and a superabsorbent monomer of the SAP into the reaction vessel, followed by reaction at a second preset temperature(40C) for a second preset time(12)[0011-0012] to obtain the biodegradable urea-formaldehyde-based polymer composite in a viscous state. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention was made to have a method of Sunden where step of forming urea formaldehyde resin composite is based on Liu, because it is suitable way to prepare UF resin for applying to cellulose material and make slow/controlled release fertilizers. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI whose telephone number is (571)270-1885. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gordon Baldwin can be reached at 5712725166. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TABASSOM TADAYYON ESLAMI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1718
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599968
METHOD OF PRODUCING AN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600634
2D AMORPHOUS CARBON FILM ASSEMBLED FROM GRAPHENE QUANTUM DOTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601049
AG- AND/OR CU- CONTAINING HARD COATINGS WITH ANTIBACTERIAL, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIFUNGAL PROPERTIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590372
LASER INDUCED FORWARD TRANSFER OF 2D MATERIALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585183
METHOD OF FORMING AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE ON A FLEXIBLE SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 776 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month