Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/069,411

ELECTRONIC COMPONENT WITH AT LEAST ONE LAYER OF A FERROELECTRIC OR ANTIFERROELECTRIC MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Examiner
MARUF, SHEIKH
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
469 granted / 541 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
66.4%
+26.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 541 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/30/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 10-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lu; Zhenyu (US PGpub: 2021/0035994 A1), herein after Lu, in view of Pandey et al. (US PGpub: 2015/0340372 A1), herein after Pandey. Regarding claim 10, Lu teaches an electronic component with at least one layer of a ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material, wherein the layer is provided, for setting an imprint, with a chemical element as a dopant (Paragraph [0046], [0051]), and is introduced into the layer in a locally inhomogeneous distribution (Paragraph [0038], [0049]-[0052]) the layer comprises at least two sub-layers, each sub-layer having a substantially uniform dopant concentration different from that of an adjacent sub-layer (FIG. 2C-2E and description Paragraph [0060]-[0062]). In fact having “a layer with plurality of sub-layer with substantially uniform dopant concentration different from that of an adjacent sub-layer” is known in the industry as taught in YOO; Hyangkeun (US PGpub: 20200105770 A1) in Paragraph [0057], FIG. 7. Lu does not explicitly, perhaps, teach dopant with chemical element as a dopant which has a different number of free outer electrons than a non-oxide element of the ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material.. However, Pandey teaches dopant with chemical element as a dopant which has a different number of free outer electrons than a non-oxide element of the ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material. (Paragraph [0041]-[0052]). Hence, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Lu’s electronic component with other teaching from Pandey so that the device resulting in a crystallized oxide layer that is suitable as a FE material for an FE memory cell. Regarding claim 11, Lu teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein the chemical element is introduced at a proportion with respect to the material with which the layer is formed of between 1 percent and 10 percent (Paragraph [0051]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]).. Regarding claim 12, Lu teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein said layer is formed of a ferroelectric material having a fluorite structure (Paragraph [0051]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]). ferroelectric layer known to include at least one of a fluorite-based material or perovskite as in US 11843037 B2 (Choe et al.). ferroelectrics have a spontaneous dipole (electric dipole), namely, spontaneous polarization, because a charge distribution within a unit cell is non-centrosymmetric in a crystallized material structure. The ferroelectrics may also have a remnant polarization due to a dipole even in a state where there are no external electric fields. In the ferroelectrics, a direction of polarization may be switched in units of domain by an external electric field. Regarding claim 13, Lu d teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein the ferroelectric material is hafnium oxide or zirconium oxide (Paragraph [0042]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]). Regarding claim 14, Lu teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein the chemical element is introduced into the layer in an asymmetric distribution (Paragraph [0051]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]).. Regarding claim 15, Lu teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein the chemical element is selected from aluminum, lanthanum and yttrium (Paragraph [0051]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]).. Regarding claim 16, Lu teaches the electronic component according to claim 10, wherein the layer is formed with an antiferroelectric material in which the chemical element used for doping is contained in the layer material in such a way that when the external electrical potential is neutral, the polarization of the layer does not switch back (Paragraph [0051]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]). Regarding claim 17, Lu teaches a buffer capacitor as an electronic component according to claim 16 FeRaM is a storage device which has memory). Regarding claim 18, Lu teaches a method of manufacturing an electronic component having at least one layer of a ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material, wherein the layer is provided, for setting an imprint, with a chemical element as a dopant (Paragraph [0046], [0051]) and is introduced into the layer in a locally inhomogeneous distribution (Paragraph [0042]-[0062], [0066]-[0068], [0077]), adding at least two sub-layers to the at least one layer of ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material, wherein each sub-layer is provided with a substantially uniform dopant concentration different from that of an adjacent sub-layer (FIG. 2C-2E and description Paragraph [0060]-[0062]). In fact having “adding at least two sub-layers to the at least one layer of ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material, wherein each sub-layer is provided with a substantially uniform dopant concentration different from that of an adjacent sub-layer” is known in the industry as taught in YOO; Hyangkeun (US PGpub: 20200105770 A1) in Paragraph [0057], FIG. 7. Lu does not explicitly, perhaps, teach dopant with chemical element as a dopant which has a different number of free outer electrons than a non-oxide element of the ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material.. However, Pandey teaches dopant with chemical element as a dopant which has a different number of free outer electrons than a non-oxide element of the ferroelectric or antiferroelectric material. (Paragraph [0041]-[0052]). Hence, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use Lu’s electronic component with other teaching from Pandey so that the method resulting in a crystallized oxide layer that is suitable as a FE material for an FE memory cell. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEIKH MARUF whose telephone number is (571)270-1903. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-6pm EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at 571-270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEIKH MARUF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 21, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 21, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
May 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 21, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604479
TWO TRANSISTOR CAPACITORLESS MEMORY CELL WITH STACKED THIN-FILM TRANSISTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604499
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH EMBEDDED FERROELECTRIC FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604625
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575111
BACK-END-OF-LINE 2D MEMORY CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568639
INSULATED GATE POWER DEVICE WITH EPITAXIALLY GROWN SUBSTRATE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 541 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month