Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/074,263

PARALLEL-TYPE COATING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COATING MULTILAYER FILM

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Dec 02, 2022
Examiner
PENCE, JETHRO M
Art Unit
1717
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Linco Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
677 granted / 860 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
903
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 860 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION 1. The Amendment filed 10/06/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-14 in the application remain pending. Claims 1-14 were amended. Claim 6 remains withdrawn from consideration. Claims 15-18 are cancelled. 2. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S.C. code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office Action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 3. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Title 4. Title objections are rendered moot per amendments. Claim Objections 5. Claim objections on claim 1 are rendered moot per amendments. Claim Rejections 6. The claim rejections under AIA 35 U.S.C. 112(b), of claims 1-5 & 7-14 are withdrawn per amendments of claims 1-5 & 7-14. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 7. Claims 1-5 & 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b), as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. As regards to claim 1, lines 17-18 recite “other ones of said one of said double-layer vacuum chamber” which is unclear whether the recitation is referencing “one of said double-layer vacuum chamber” recited in lines 11-12 or “other ones of said double-layer vacuum chamber”. For examination purposes, examiner is interpreting “other ones of said one of said double-layer vacuum chamber” as “other ones of said double-layer vacuum chamber” to recite additional double-layer vacuum chambers. To correct this problem, amend lines 17-18 to recite “other ones of said double-layer vacuum chamber”. Claims 2-5 & 7-14 are rejected at least based on their dependency from claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 8. Claims 1-5 & 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fairbairn et al. (US 2006/0102078 A1) hereinafter Fairbairn in view of Tabrizi et al. (US 2004/0091349 A1) hereinafter Tabrizi. As regards to claim 1, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus suitable for coating at least one object to be coated carried by a carrier (abs; fig 1-9), comprising: a double-layer vacuum chamber 13 ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20); a plurality of process chambers 18 for performing at least a fixed point coating on the at least one object to be coated, two of said process chambers 18 being immediately adjacent (see fig 2) to said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, said double-layer vacuum chamber 13 and said process chambers 18 being arranged in two juxtaposed rows (see fig 2 & 8) in a Y-direction transverse to the Z-direction ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20); a feed lifting mechanism disposed in said process chambers 18, and including a feed lifting seat 58 for carrying the carrier 43, said feed lifting seat 58 being movable in the Z-direction, and including a first transfer device ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) for conveying the carrier 43 to move in an X-direction transverse to the Y-direction and the Z-direction, and a second transfer device ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) for conveying the carrier 43 to move in the Y-direction ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20); and a plurality of first conveying devices ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) respectively disposed in other ones of said process chambers 18 for conveying the carrier 43 to move in the X-direction or Y-direction ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20), however Fairbairn does not disclose a feed chamber and a discharge chamber opposite to each other in a Z-direction, said feed chamber being configured for feeding the carrier, said discharge chamber being configured for discharging the carrier, wherein one of said feed chamber and said discharge chamber has the same height as said process chambers in the Z-direction, such that the carrier is always maintained at the same height during said at least one fixed point coating process. Tabrizi discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-12), comprising a feed chamber 418a and a discharge chamber 418b opposite to each other in a Z-direction, said feed chamber 418a being configured for feeding the carrier 412, said discharge chamber 418b being configured for discharging the carrier 412 ([0011]; [0015]; [0020]; [0046]-[0049]; fig 4). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include a feed chamber and a discharge chamber opposite to each other in a Z-direction, said feed chamber being configured for feeding the carrier, said discharge chamber being configured for discharging the carrier in the parallel coating apparatus of Fairbairn, because Tabrizi teaches the use of a feed chamber and a discharge chamber opposite to each other in a Z-direction, said feed chamber being configured for feeding the carrier, said discharge chamber being configured for discharging the carrier to allow removal of processed workpieces and reload the load lock with new workpieces, hence, one may be open to atmosphere where a handler unloads or reloads workpieces while other(s) operate, for example, impartial vacuum, allowing a vacuum handler to supply workpieces to and from the process chamber(s); additionally, the load locks may provide the capability to cool post process workpieces prior to or during their pressure transition from the reduced pressure of the load lock to atmospheric pressure, this functional independence makes such a system capable of providing a steady supply of pre-processed workpieces for the vacuum handler thus achieving high throughput in nearly continuous workpiece processing ([0011]; [0015]; [0020]; [0046]-[0049]; fig 4), however modified Fairbairn does not disclose wherein one of said feed chamber and said discharge chamber has the same height as said process chambers in the Z-direction, such that the carrier is always maintained at the same height during said at least one fixed point coating process. Although the combination of Fairbairn and Tabrizi does not explicitly disclose the claimed chamber configuration, before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the apparatus of Fairbairn and Tabrizi to have the support member configuration recited in the claim and therefore is not expected to alter the operation of the device in a patentably distinct way and would have been obvious to and within the purview of one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange one of said feed chamber and said discharge chamber to have the same height as said process chambers in the Z-direction, such that the carrier is always maintained at the same height during said at least one fixed point coating process, since “the particular placement of structural components was held to be an obvious matter of design choice.” In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 188 USPQ 7 (CCPA 1975). As regards to claim 2, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), further comprising a plurality of second conveying devices ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) respectively located on bottom sides of said first conveying devices ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) for respectively driving said first conveying devices ([0018]; [0034]-[0036]) to rotate 90 degrees ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 3, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), further comprising a loading and unloading area 12 immediately adjacent to said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, said loading and unloading area 12 including a loading lifting seat robot movable in the Z-direction, said loading lifting seat robot being configured for placement of the carrier 43 thereon, and having a loading conveying device arm for conveying the carrier 43 to move in the X-direction ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 4, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said double-layer vacuum chamber 13 further includes a heating device ([0002]) disposed in contact with said feed chamber (Tabrizi above) for heating and baking the at least one object to be coated ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 5, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said process chambers 18 include a treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, a first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), and a buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, and wherein each of said buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) has a vacuum degree not lower than that of said treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 7, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein each of said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) has at least one target 51 ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0030]-[0031]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2, 5 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 8, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said at least one target 51 is cylindrical ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0030]-[0031]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2, 5 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 9, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) are independent vacuum chambers ([0002]-[0004]; [0016]-[0019]; [0023]; [0030]-[0031]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-5 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 10, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein a vacuum valve is disposed between said double-layer vacuum chamber 13 and said treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), between said treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), and between said buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, and wherein said vacuum valve is movable in the Z-direction to open or close ([0002]-[0004]; [0016]-[0019]; [0023]; [0030]-[0031]; [0034]-[0039]; fig 1-5 & 8A-9; clm 1, 9 & 20). As regards to claim 11, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said feed lifting mechanism is disposed in contact with said buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 12, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said process chambers 18 include a treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said double-layer vacuum chamber 13, a first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said treatment chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a fourth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), a fifth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said fourth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), and a buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) connected to said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said fifth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said double-layer vacuum chamber 13 ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 13, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), wherein said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said fourth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said fifth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said buffer chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) are independent vacuum chambers, and wherein each of said first coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said second coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said third coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]), said fourth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) and said fifth coating chamber ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) has at least one target 51([0002]-[0004]; [0016]-[0019]; [0023]; [0030]-[0031]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-5 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). As regards to claim 14, Fairbairn discloses parallel coating apparatus (abs; fig 1-9), further comprising a cooling device provided in each of said process chambers 18 ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]) ([0002]; [0004]; [0016]-[0018]; [0034]-[0036]; fig 1-2 & 8A-8C; clm 1 & 20). Response to Arguments 9. Applicant's arguments filed 10/06/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s principal arguments are: (a) Fairbairn et al. does not teach the claimed feature, the processing chambers (41 to 44) and one of the feed chamber (31) and the discharge chamber (32) are configured to have the same height in the Z-direction. Tabrizi also fails to teach this feature. (b) In view of the above, neither of Fairbairn and Tabrizi teach the aforementioned feature of the present invention, and thus the combination of Fairbairn and Tabrizi would not achieve the claimed invention. 10. In response to applicant’s arguments, please consider the following comments. (a) Although the combination of Fairbairn and Tabrizi does not explicitly disclose the claimed chamber configuration, before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the apparatus of Fairbairn and Tabrizi to have the support member configuration recited in the claim and therefore is not expected to alter the operation of the device in a patentably distinct way and would have been obvious to and within the purview of one having ordinary skill in the art to arrange one of said feed chamber and said discharge chamber to have the same height as said process chambers in the Z-direction, such that the carrier is always maintained at the same height during said at least one fixed point coating process, since “the particular placement of structural components was held to be an obvious matter of design choice.” In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 188 USPQ 7 (CCPA 1975). (b) In view of the foregoing, Examiner respectfully contends the limitations of claim 1 are indeed satisfied. Claims 2-5 & 7-14 are rejected at least based on their dependency from claim 1, as well as for their own rejections on the merits, respectively. Conclusion 11. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jethro M Pence whose telephone number is (571)270-7423. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 8:00 A.M. - 6:30 P.M.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dah-Wei D. Yuan can be reached on 571-272-1295. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jethro M. Pence/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 1717
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601041
MASK, MASK STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MASK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600041
SURFACE ANALYST END EFFECTOR FOR INDUSTRIAL ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595541
HOT DIP COATING DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594626
MASK AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590343
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DIP COATING A METAL STRIP USING A MOVEABLE OVERFLOW
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 860 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month