Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/075,945

FLUID-BASED DEVICES FOR STORING AND PREPARING FOOD AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 06, 2022
Priority
Sep 15, 2017 — provisional 62/559,060 +4 more
Examiner
BECKER, DREW E
Art Unit
1792
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Home Tech Innovation Inc.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
431 granted / 880 resolved
-16.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
911
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 880 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 9/28/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 31-37, 39-42, 46-48, 50, 54-55, 57, 60-63 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The claims recite a circulation system which is isolated from a reservoir during a cooling stage and first heating stage, as well as a second heating stage wherein the circulation system is isolated from a heater. Although Figure 22 illustrates a circulation system with bypass lines capable of isolating/skipping the water heater and reservoir (#549, 541, S4, S7), there is NO discussion or explanation of when/why these elements would be bypassed. The application does not appear to disclose at least the above claimed concepts. The application appears to be silent on when/where/how water is routed through the system at each respective state/flow path/portion. In addition, the concepts of new claims 62-63 also are not disclosed in the application. Applicant must point out where ALL claim limitations directed to how/when/where water is routed through the various elements are disclosed in the application. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 31-37, 39-42, 46-48, 50, 54-55, 57, 60-63 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DREW E BECKER whose telephone number is (571)272-1396. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erik Kashnikow can be reached at 571-270-3475. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DREW E BECKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Aug 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 27, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Sep 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745873
FOOD CARTRIDGES AND CARRIERS FOR USE IN A COOKING DEVICE
6y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733660
PRECISION TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE CONTENT CONTROL FOR BATCH FOOD PRODUCTION USING A VACUUM SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12696917
PREPARATION METHOD OF EASY-TO-COOK WHOLE GRAIN BASED ON MICROWAVE-INDUCED CRACKING
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12685319
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PURINE REDUCTION, AND EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12667112
GLYCYRRHIZA AND THE PREVENTION OF LC-PUFA OXIDATION
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+0.2%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 880 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month