Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Examiner: BECKER, DREW E

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1782 1792 1794

This examiner grants 49% of resolved cases

Analysis

Drew E. Becker is an examiner in Art Unit 1782 of Tech Center 1700, with a total of 878 resolved cases. The allowance rate pct of 49.0 indicates a challenging environment where fewer than half of the applications result in a patent grant. This 49.0 percent rate suggests that applicants must be prepared for rigorous examination and potential rejections. The median days to allowance is 1176, reflecting a prosecution timeline that typically involves a significant duration of examination. This 1176-day median indicates that practitioners should expect an extended period of back and forth before reaching a favorable outcome in Tech Center 1700. The volume of 878 resolved cases provides a robust data set for these metrics.

The interview lift pct of 0.2 is extremely low, suggesting that conducting an interview has almost no impact on the probability of allowance. This minimal lift indicates that the 49.0 percent baseline success rate is primarily determined by the written record and standard prosecution steps. For practitioners, this implies that verbal negotiation may not be a necessary or particularly effective tool in Art Unit 1782. Instead, focusing on clear and comprehensive written responses is likely the most efficient way to navigate the 1176-day median wait time. The data suggests that the examiner's decisions are largely driven by the merits of the written application alone. This predictability in the impact of interviews can be a significant factor for strategic planning. Applicants should prioritize strong written advocacy to overcome the challenges presented by the 49.0 percent allowance rate.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

49.0%
Allow Rate
-16.0% vs TC avg
905
Total Applications
+0.2%
Interview Lift
1176
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 878 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

1.0%
§101 Eligibility
11.2%
§102 Novelty
45.6%
§103 Obviousness
30.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18156783 REFRIGERATOR WITH MEAT AGING FUNCTION AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE REFRIGERATOR Non-Final OA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18649533 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING DAIRY PROTEIN FUNCTIONALITY Non-Final OA REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
18577908 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN INSECT-BASED, LOW-FAT PROTEIN MEAL FROM AN INSECT-BASED RAW MATERIAL Final Rejection ALFA LAVAL CORPORATE AB
18890015 STEAMER INSERT AND METHOD OF OPERATING A MICROWAVE OVEN Non-Final OA Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.
17966194 AIR QUALITY MONITORING SYSTEM FOR AN INDOOR SMOKER Non-Final OA Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc.
18214810 PET FOOD Non-Final OA Unicharm Corporation
18832398 TWO-STEP COOKING Final Rejection Bühler AG

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month