Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/076,493

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 07, 2022
Examiner
NELSON, JACOB THEODORE
Art Unit
2815
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
99 granted / 116 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
158
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 116 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/26/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) as being anticipated by US 20200083402 A1 Henry. For claim 1, Henry teaches “A display device (fig. 6H) comprising: light emitting elements (fig. 6H numerals 635, 630, and 625) each including a first area and a second area having different diameters (fig. 6H shows the elements having tapered shape having two diameters of different sizes); and a base layer having at least a partially tapered shape (fig. 6H numeral 660) matching a shape of and surrounding the first area of the light emitting elements and contacting an entire side surface of the first area of each of the light emitting elements (fig. 6H shows the base layer 660 surrounding the light emitting elements 635, 630, and 625, figure 6H shows the base layer 660 in contact directly or indirectly with the first area without any interruptions in the layer resulting in the entire side surface of the first area being in contact with the base layer; the shape of the base layer appears to be the inverse shape of the light emitting elements, resulting in the shapes of the elements and the base layer matching), wherein the first area extends from a bottom surface of each of the light emitting elements to a top surface of the base layer, wherein the second are of each of the light emitting elements protrudes from a first surface of the base layer (fig. 6H shows the second area matching the layer 625 of the light emitting elements protruding from the base layer 660).”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 - 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. For claim 2, Henry does not appear to teach the first area having a greater diameter than the second area of the light emitting elements. Henry appears to explicitly teach the area of the light emitting elements protruding from the base layer (corresponding to the second area) having a larger diameter than the first area of the light emitting elements. There is no obvious reason why one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the immediate invention would invert the shape of the light emitting elements so that the protruding area has a smaller diameter than the non-protruding area contacting the base layer. Claims 3 – 14 are primarily allowable as depending on an allowable claim, but are objected to as depending on a rejected independent base claim. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20220109023 A1 teaches a tapered light emitting element surrounded by an insulating layer. It does not appear to teach an area of the light emitting element protruding from the insulating layer. US 7198411 B2 teaches an embedded light emitting element with a tapered shape having two different diameters at two areas of the light emitting element. It does not appear to teach the light emitting element protruding form the base layer the light emitting element is embedded in. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB T NELSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1031. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Benitez can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.T.N./Examiner, Art Unit 2815 /MONICA D HARRISON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 07, 2022
Application Filed
Jul 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 01, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Dec 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604592
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588336
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575095
FLASH MEMORY AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12575159
HIGH VOLTAGE SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12538843
PIXEL UNIT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.3%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 116 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month