Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/085,088

TECHNIQUES FOR TRACKING EXECUTABLE IMAGES ACROSS FORKING OPERATIONS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 20, 2022
Examiner
RAHIM, MONJUR
Art Unit
2436
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Crowdstrike Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
742 granted / 879 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.7%
-28.3% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 879 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION 1. This action is responsive to: an RCE filed on 21 January 2026. 2. Claims 1-20 are currently pending and rejected. Responses to the Argument 3. The applicant’s arguments filed on 21 January 2026 are moot in view of new ground of rejection rendered. Examiner’s Note 4. Double patenting rejection remain rejected. Need Terminal Disclaimer to be filed. Double Patenting 5. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the claims at issue are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO internet Web site contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit http://www.uspto.gov/forms/. The filing date of the application will determine what form should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to http://www.uspto.gov/patents /process/ file/efs/guidance /eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of US Patent Application No. 18/081,144. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because, the notion of the claim does reefers to the same invention. In both claims disclose "executable process tracking" based on process activity. And it is obvious to anyone in the art, time of invention that is to use it to detect malicious executable process. Conclusion 6. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Monjour Rahim whose telephone number is (571)270-3890. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shewaye Gelagay can be reached on 571-272-4219. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (in USA or CANANDA) or 571-272-1000. /Monjur Rahim/ Patent Examiner United States Patent and Trademark Office Art Unit: 2436; Phone: 571.270.3890 E-mail: monjur.rahim@uspto.gov Fax: 571.270.4890
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Jun 30, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §DP
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP
Apr 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603913
SELECTING A TRANSMISSION PATH FOR COMMUNICATING DATA BASED ON A CLASSIFICATION FOR THE DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596807
UNIFIED EXTENSIBLE FIRMWARE INTERFACE (UEFI)-LEVEL PROCESSING OF OUT-OF-BAND COMMANDS IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598458
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR SECURE COMMUNICATION WITH AND OPERATION OF AN IMPLANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580742
SECURE MEMORY SYSTEM PROGRAMMING FOR HOST DEVICE VERIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574214
DISTRIBUTION AND USE OF ENCRYPTION KEYS TO DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 879 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month