Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

CrowdStrike Inc.

24 pending office actions • 22 art units • 24 examiners • 0 of 24 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 65 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

24
Total Pending OAs
16
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (46%)
13
Medium (54%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (4%)
§101 + other4 (17%)
§103 only10 (42%)
§102 only2 (8%)
Double-patenting + other1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
21
Information Tech
88% of docket
2
Communications
8% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
4% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

240 h
Manual time on pending OAs
48 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
84 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, TRONG H 1 79.9% +56.6%
FISHER, PAUL R 1 23.3% +24.1%
SPOONER, LAMONT M 1 73.6% +12.2%
ZHU, ZHIMEI 1 77.6% +37.2%
GIDDINS, NELSON S 1 84.7% +10.2%
IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O 1 71.5% +19.0%
HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT 1 79.0% +23.4%
CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. 1 87.1% +36.8%
LE, VU 1 52.4% +7.9%
BOURZIK, BRAHIM 1 64.1% +44.0%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18475058 INCREMENTAL SOLVES USING LLMS FOR API CALLS DASCOMB, JACOB D 1d overdue
18383791 Method and Apparatus for Data Synchronization and Persistence Between Computing Devices HOANG, PHUONG N 30d
17943061 Source Code Programming Language Prediction for a Text File JEON, JAE UK 40d
18960497 CYBERSECURITY RISK DETECTION FOR A SERVICE FISHER, PAUL R
18900283 REPRESENTATION-AGNOSTIC FILE CLASSIFIER ZHU, ZHIMEI
18899421 AUTO-CUSTOMIZING CONFIGURATION ASSESSMENT RULE VALUES FROM CAPTURED STATE OF A TEMPLATE MACHINE GIDDINS, NELSON S
18789144 STATIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A.
18399390 USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TO GENERATE NATURAL LANGUAGE DESCRIPTIONS OF CODE FOR ENHANCED THREAT ANALYSIS AND MALWARE DETECTION CHANG, TOM Y

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18760946 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING STATIC ANALYSIS ON DEPLOYED APPLICATION CODE BOURZIK, BRAHIM 16d overdue
19017191 INJECTED BYTE BUFFER DATA CLASSIFICATION NGUYEN, TRONG H
18960497 CYBERSECURITY RISK DETECTION FOR A SERVICE FISHER, PAUL R
18926119 DEFINING INDICATORS OF MALICIOUS ACTIVITY BY A MACHINE LEARNED MODEL SPOONER, LAMONT M
18900283 REPRESENTATION-AGNOSTIC FILE CLASSIFIER ZHU, ZHIMEI
18899421 AUTO-CUSTOMIZING CONFIGURATION ASSESSMENT RULE VALUES FROM CAPTURED STATE OF A TEMPLATE MACHINE GIDDINS, NELSON S
18894372 Prediction of False Positive Cybersecurity Detections IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O
18819747 AI MODEL-BASED DATA ENRICHMENT PIPELINE HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2432 2
2436 1
2498 1
2657 1
2495 1
2408 1
2494 1
2458 1
2192 1
2668 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19017191 INJECTED BYTE BUFFER DATA CLASSIFICATION NGUYEN, TRONG H 2436 §112DP Non-Final OA Pending Jan 10, 2025
18960497 CYBERSECURITY RISK DETECTION FOR A SERVICE FISHER, PAUL R 2498 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 26, 2024
18926119 DEFINING INDICATORS OF MALICIOUS ACTIVITY BY A MACHINE LEARNED MODEL SPOONER, LAMONT M 2657 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 24, 2024
18900283 REPRESENTATION-AGNOSTIC FILE CLASSIFIER ZHU, ZHIMEI 2495 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2024
18899421 AUTO-CUSTOMIZING CONFIGURATION ASSESSMENT RULE VALUES FROM CAPTURED STATE OF A TEMPLATE MACHINE GIDDINS, NELSON S 2408 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 27, 2024
18894372 Prediction of False Positive Cybersecurity Detections IDOWU, OLUGBENGA O 2494 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 24, 2024
18819747 AI MODEL-BASED DATA ENRICHMENT PIPELINE HENDERSON, ESTHER BENOIT 2458 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 29, 2024
18789144 STATIC ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMIC COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE CHOWDHURY, ZIAUL A. 2192 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 30, 2024
18773123 IMAGE ANALYSIS USING A MULTIMODAL LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL LE, VU 2668 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 15, 2024
18760946 TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING STATIC ANALYSIS ON DEPLOYED APPLICATION CODE BOURZIK, BRAHIM 2191 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Jul 01, 2024
18630667 eBPF GENERAL ALLOCATOR VINCENT, ROSS MICHAEL §103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 09, 2024
18588976 AUTOMATED VULNERABILITY REMEDIATION GUIDANCE BASED ON DETECTION LOGIC ELEMENTS LYNCH, SHARON S 2400 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 27, 2024
18399390 USING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS TO GENERATE NATURAL LANGUAGE DESCRIPTIONS OF CODE FOR ENHANCED THREAT ANALYSIS AND MALWARE DETECTION CHANG, TOM Y 2455 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 28, 2023
18383791 Method and Apparatus for Data Synchronization and Persistence Between Computing Devices HOANG, PHUONG N 2194 §101§103 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Oct 25, 2023
18475058 INCREMENTAL SOLVES USING LLMS FOR API CALLS DASCOMB, JACOB D 2198 §103§112 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending Sep 26, 2023
18460886 Embedding Entity Matching MORRIS, JOHN J 2152 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Sep 05, 2023
18338112 Rules-Based Malware Resolution Suggestions REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A 2407 §103 Non-Final OA 82d Pending Jun 20, 2023
18175766 FINGERPRINTING TECHNIQUES TO SUPPORT FILE HASH GENERATION VU, TAYLOR P 2437 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 28, 2023
18159266 DATA-ONLY DECISION VALIDATION MODELS TO UPDATE FALSE PREDICTIONS ZHENG, BIN QING 2499 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jan 25, 2023
17943061 Source Code Programming Language Prediction for a Text File JEON, JAE UK 2193 §101 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Sep 12, 2022
17884295 IDENTIFICATION OF A COMPUTING DEVICE DURING AUTHENTICATION KHADKA, AMIT 2432 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 09, 2022
17855360 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTITY CONTROL SHAUGHNESSY, AIDAN EDWARD 2432 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 30, 2022
17745762 ENTROPY EXCLUSION OF TRAINING DATA FOR AN EMBEDDING NETWORK HICKS, AUSTIN JAMES 2142 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending May 16, 2022
17177220 EMBEDDING NETWORKS TO EXTRACT MALWARE FAMILY INFORMATION KWON, JUN 2127 §101§103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 17, 2021

Managing CrowdStrike Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month