Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/087,453

ORGANOMINERAL FERTILIZER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 22, 2022
Priority
Dec 30, 2021 — BR 10 2021 026904 9
Examiner
SMITH, JENNIFER A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
539 granted / 883 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+26.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 883 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/13/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regard to claim 4, the limitation "8%" in line 3 and the limitation “20%” in line 5 are indefinite because the percentage value lacks specified units or a clear basis of calculation. It is unclear whether the percentage is a percentage by weight, a percentage by volume, or an elemental weight ratio. A person of skill in the art cannot determine the quantitative boundaries of the claimed composition without these units. Indication of Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2 and 6-9 are allowable. Claim 4 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art of record - Christensen (US Patent Publication No. 2010/0133368 A1) - discloses a composition comprising: a mineral matrix, chosen from the drilling gravel (e.g. a drill cuttings granulate) [para. 0060] and an organic matrix consisting of algal biomass produced by cultivating cyanobacteria, microalgae or macroalgae in culture media based on drilling gravel (e.g. growth of algae on the granulates, wherein algae is an organism including microalgae and macroalgae) [0060]. Zaseybida (CA2874890 – cite no 1 in 03/02/2023 IDS) describes an agricultural composition comprising basalt/glacial gravel dust, sea minerals and humic substances comprising minerals and organic carbon for soil and plant health as well as the nutrients and benefits of microalgae [pgs. 14; 16]. However, the prior art references do not teach or render obvious all the cumulative limitations of independent claim 1 with particular attention to a mineral matrix comprising drilling gravel and wherein the claimed fertilizer is a solid product that is soluble in water. The composition disclosed by the Christensen reference is described as undergoing a process of hardening on the seabed and is not considered soluble in water. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jennifer A Smith whose telephone number is (571)270-3599. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:30am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber R Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER A SMITH/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1731 August 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 22, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735367
ENCAPSULATED FERTILIZER COMPRISING ESSENTIAL OILS, POLYMERS AND MACRONUTRIENTS AND METHOD OF PREPARATION THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12686649
METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A UREA-BASED COMPOSITION COMPRISING THE ADDITION OF A LIQUID-FREE SOLID ADDITIVE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686648
METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A UREA-BASED COMPOSITION COMPRISING THE ADDITION OF AN ADDITIVE IN AN AQUEOUS FORM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679786
INCORPORATION OF WETTING AGENT WITH GRANULAR FERTILIZERS FOR ENHANCING FERTILIZER DISPERSION AND PLANT UPTAKE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679784
SPHERICAL UREA-ALDEHYDE CONDENSATE FERTILIZERS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+26.6%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 883 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month