Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/089,483

TSV-TYPE EMBEDDED MULTI-DIE INTERCONNECT BRIDGE ENABLING WITH THERMAL COMPRESSION NON-CONDUCTIVE FILM (TC-NCF) PROCESS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 27, 2022
Examiner
FERNANDES, ERROL V
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Intel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
667 granted / 786 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
814
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 786 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8, 10-13, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Vaidya et al. US 2021/0272881 A1. Regarding claims 1-6, 8 and 10, Vaidya discloses: An electronic package (Figs. 1-11), comprising: a package substrate (901); an opening (923) in the package substrate, wherein a plurality of first pads (902) are provided at a bottom of the opening; a bridge die (500) in the opening, wherein the bridge die comprises a plurality of second pads (103) that are coupled to the first pads by solder; and a non-conductive film (NCF) (906) around the solder between the first pads and the second pads. (claim 2) a plurality of vias (102). (claim 3) an organic material (para 0072 and 0075). (claim 4) glass (para 0075; woven glass cloth). (claim 5) an epoxy (para 0077). (claim 6) surface finish (902 shown with planar/flat surface). (claim 8) a passive bridge die (only 102 vias shown in 500). claim 10) a first die (929); a second die (930) (Fig. 11). Regarding claims 10-13 and 15, Vaidya discloses: A bridge die (Fig. 5; 500), comprising: a die substrate (101); a plurality of vias (102) through the die substrate; a plurality of pads (103) over a backside of the plurality of vias; a plurality of solder bumps (113) on the plurality of pads; and a non-conductive film (NCF) (106) over the plurality of solder bumps. (claim 12) an epoxy (para 0077). (claim 13) solder bumps (113) embedded in NCF (106). (claim 15) a passive bridge die (only 102 vias shown in 500). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 9 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vaidya et al. US 2021/0272881 A1 in view of Wang et al. US 2018/0366436 A1. Regarding claims 9 and 14, Vaidya does no disclose: wherein the bridge die/ die substrate is an active bridge/silicon die. Wang discloses a publication from a similar field of endeavor in which: wherein the bridge die/die substrate is an active bridge/silicon die (para 0019). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to employ an active die as shown by Wang for the similar bridge die/die substrate of Vaidya to increase functionality of the overall electronic package. Claims 16-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Vaidya et al. US 2021/0272881. Regarding claims 16-20, Vaidya discloses: An electronic system (Figs. 1-11; paras 0104-0117), comprising: a package substrate (901) comprising: a cavity (923); a bridge die (500) in the cavity, wherein a backside of the bridge die is coupled to pads (902) in the cavity using a non-conductive film (NCF) (906) around solder between the bridge die and the pads; a first die (929) coupled to the package substrate; and a second die (930) coupled to the package substrate, wherein the first die is communicatively coupled to the second die by the bridge die. Although Vaidya does not specifically disclose “a board”, Vaidya discloses various electronic systems, in paras 0104-0117, in which the electronic package of Fig. 11 can be employed. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to understand that the electronic package in Fig. 11 of Vaidya would be connected to a board or PCB using bond pads 902 in order to be integrated into the discussed electronic systems. (claim 17) a passive bridge die (only 102 vias shown in 500). (claim 18) an epoxy (para 0077). (claim 19) surface finish (902 shown with planar/flat surface). (claim 20) paras 0104-0117. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERROL V FERNANDES whose telephone number is (571)270-7433. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley can be reached on 571-270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERROL V FERNANDES/Primary Examiner, AU 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 02, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604781
PACKAGE STRUCTURE INCLUDING GUIDING PATTERNS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599043
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593738
FLIP CHIP PACKAGE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588470
GLASS CARRIER STACKED PACKAGE ASSEMBLY METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588554
Semiconductor Device and Method Forming Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 786 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month