Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/090,915

MEMORY DEVICES AND METHODS FOR FORMING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 29, 2022
Examiner
BRADFORD, PETER
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 733 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
32.5%
-7.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 733 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment See the new rejections below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6, and 20-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang, US 2023/0354599, in view of Lee, US 2011/0092060. Claim 1: Yang discloses a semiconductor layer (502); and an array of memory cells disposed on the semiconductor layer, wherein each of the memory cells comprises: a semiconductor body (510) extending in a first direction, wherein a first end of the semiconductor body is in contact with the semiconductor layer (FIG. 1); a word line gate (WL1, WL2) extending in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; a plurality of plate line gates (PL1, PL2) extending in the second direction; and a dielectric layer (512) disposed between the semiconductor body and the word line gate and the plurality of plate line gates (FIGS 5, 12K): PNG media_image1.png 660 418 media_image1.png Greyscale Yang discloses a peripheral circuit ([0102]). It was known in the art to have memory cells aside (to the side of) the peripheral circuit. See e.g. Lee, FIG. 28 which discloses a peripheral circuit formed to the side of the memory area, and on the same substrate 200. PNG media_image2.png 464 678 media_image2.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to have done so to form a complete device on a semiconductor circuit in a common and known way. Claim 1 also recites a stairstep connection structure, which is disclosed by Yang. See Yang FIG. 12K, which shows contact structures extending in the first (vertical) direction, wherein the plurality of plate line gates recede from bottom to top to form a staircase structure; and each contact structure of the plurality of contact structures is in contact with one of the plurality of plate line gates: PNG media_image3.png 558 734 media_image3.png Greyscale Claim 2: the plurality of plate line gates comprise a plurality of conductive lines (plate lines PL) extending in the second direction parallel to the word line gate (Yang FIG. 5). Claim 3: the semiconductor body (silicon) and the semiconductor layer comprise a same semiconductor material (silicon, e.g. silicon-on-insulator) ([0040]-[0043]). Claim 4: Sukui discloses a bit line (BL) extending in a third direction perpendicular to the first direction and the second direction, wherein a second end of the semiconductor body is in contact with the bit line (FIG. 1). Claim 5: Yang discloses a contact (522, FIG. 5) disposed between the bit line and the second end of the semiconductor body. Claim 6: the semiconductor layer comprises a memory area and a peripheral area, the array of memory cells is disposed in the memory area, and the peripheral circuit is disposed in the peripheral area (Lee FIG. 28). Claim 20: Yang discloses a semiconductor layer (502); and an array of memory cells disposed on the semiconductor layer, wherein each of the memory cells comprises: a semiconductor body (510) extending in a first direction, wherein a first end of the semiconductor body is in contact with the semiconductor layer (FIG. 5); a word line gate (WL0/WL1) extending in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction; a plurality of plate line gates (PL1, PL2) extending in the second direction; and a dielectric layer (512) disposed between the semiconductor body and the word line gate and the plurality of plate line gates; and a memory controller ([0102]) coupled to the memory device and configured to control operations of the array of memory cells. Yang discloses a peripheral circuit ([0102]), stating that the invention. It was known in the art to have memory cells aside (to the side of) the peripheral circuit. See e.g. Lee, which discloses a peripheral circuit formed to the side of the memory area, and on the same substrate 200. It would have been obvious to have done so to form a complete device on a semiconductor circuit in a common way. Claim 20 also recites a stairstep connection structure, which is disclosed by Yang. See Yang FIG. 12K, which shows contact structures extending in the first (vertical) direction, wherein the plurality of plate line gates recede from bottom to top to form a staircase structure; and each contact structure of the plurality of contact structures is in contact with one of the plurality of plate line gates. Claim 21: the plurality of plate line gates comprise a plurality of conductive lines extending in the second direction parallel to the word line gate. Yang FIG. 5. Claim 22: Yang discloses a silicon semiconductor body (“pillar 510 can include a semiconductor material, for example, Si” Yang [0142]). Yang discloses that the semiconductor layer 502 is a silicon ([0141]). Claim 23: there is a bit line extending in a third direction perpendicular to the first direction and the second direction, wherein a second end of the semiconductor body is in contact with the bit line. Yang FIG. 5, 12K. Claim 24: there is a contact (Yang 522, FIG. 5) disposed between the bit line and the second end of the semiconductor body. Claim 25: the semiconductor layer comprises a memory area and a peripheral area, the array of memory cells is disposed in the memory area, and the peripheral circuit is disposed in the peripheral area (Lee FIG. 28). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER BRADFORD whose telephone number is (571)270-1596. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30-6:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Choi can be reached at 469.295.9060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER BRADFORD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 29, 2022
Application Filed
Aug 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 08, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 11, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 18, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604477
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH CONDUCTIVE LAYERS IN ISOLATION STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604585
MICROLED CONNECTION WITH CU BUMP ON TI/AL WIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593573
DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING A DISPLAY PANEL HAVING INSULATING LAYERS OVER A PAD AND METHOD OF PROVIDING THE DISPLAY PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581658
FERROELECTRIC MEMORY WITH MULTIPLE FERROELETRIC LAYERS THROUGH A STACK OF GATE LINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575429
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING A LEAD FRAME AND A CLIP FRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+4.1%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 733 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month